agentsclimarketplace

Weekly prep brief

Skill ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace/plugins/anthropics/skills/weekly-prep-brief

Generate a comprehensive weekly briefing for all external calls in the next 7 days. Triggers on 'weekly prep brief', 'prepare my week', 'what calls do I have this week', 'Monday prep', or any weekly planning request.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace --skill weekly-prep-brief

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.3 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Weekly Prep Brief

Generate a single comprehensive weekly briefing that covers every external customer or prospect call in the next 7 days, with per-meeting account and contact research from Common Room.

Briefing Process

Step 1: Get the Week's External Meetings

Option A — Calendar connected: Use the ~~calendar connector to fetch all meetings scheduled in the next 7 days (or a user-specified range). Filter to keep only external meetings — those with attendees from outside your organization. Discard internal-only meetings, one-on-ones with colleagues, and recurring internal syncs.

Identify for each external meeting:

  • Company name
  • Meeting date and time
  • External attendee names and email addresses

Option B — No calendar connected: Ask the user: "To build your weekly prep brief, I'll need your upcoming external calls. Please list them: company name, date/time, and attendee names."

Accept freeform input and parse it into a structured list before proceeding.

Step 2: Confirm the Meeting List

Present the identified meetings to the user for confirmation before beginning research:

"Here are the external calls I found for this week. Let me know if anything's missing or should be excluded:

  • [Company] — [Day], [Time] — [Attendees]
  • ..."

This prevents wasted research on cancelled or incorrect meetings.

Step 3: Research Each Meeting

For each confirmed external meeting, run in parallel where possible:

  1. Account research — full account snapshot using the account-research skill
  2. Contact research — profile for each external attendee using the contact-research skill

Common Room data is the primary source. After CR research, run a quick recency check for each company — this is supplementary, not primary:

  • Search "[company name]" news scoped to the last 7 days
  • For executive attendees, search their name for recent public posts or interviews
  • Only include findings that are genuinely noteworthy (funding, leadership changes, major press). Don't pad the brief with generic news.

Depth calibration:

  • For high-priority accounts (large accounts, open opportunities, renewal risk), produce full depth research
  • For lower-priority or short meetings, produce abbreviated snapshots (3–4 bullets each)

Step 4: Synthesize the Weekly Brief

Compile all per-meeting research into a single structured document, sorted by meeting date/time.

Open with a brief week-level overview that flags:

  • Any accounts with urgent signals (at-risk, trial expiring, expansion opportunity)
  • Any meetings that need special preparation or executive involvement
  • Total external call count and estimated time commitment

Output Format

# Weekly Prep Brief — Week of [Date]

## Week Overview
[2–4 bullets: key themes, flagged priorities, call count]

---

## [Monday / Tuesday / etc.]

### [Company Name] — [Time]
**Attendees:** [Names and titles]
**Meeting type:** [Discovery / QBR / Renewal / Expansion / etc. — inferred if possible]

**Company Snapshot**
[4–5 bullets: account status, top signals, recent activity]

**Attendee Profiles**
- **[Name]** ([Title]): [2–3 bullets on their signals, persona, conversation angle]
- [Repeat per attendee]

**Top Signals This Week**
[2–3 most relevant signals for this specific call]

**This Week's News** [If notable news found]
[Only genuinely noteworthy findings — funding, leadership changes, major press]

**Recommended Objectives**
[1–2 sentences: what to accomplish in this meeting]

---

[Repeat per meeting, sorted by date/time]

When a Meeting Has Sparse Data

If Common Room returns limited data for a particular meeting's account or attendees, use a compressed format for that meeting instead of the full template:

### [Company Name] — [Time] ⚠️ Limited Data
**Attendees:** [Names and titles if known]
**Data available:** [What Common Room actually returned]

**Web Search Results**
[Findings from web search — company news, attendee LinkedIn profiles]

**Note:** Common Room has limited data on this account. The rep may want to check directly in CR or gather context from colleagues before this call.

Do not generate a full meeting prep section (company snapshot, signal highlights, talking points, recommended objectives) from sparse data. A short honest section is more useful than a fabricated full one.

Quality Standards

  • Keep each meeting section scannable — reps read these in the morning, often on mobile
  • Always sort by date/time ascending
  • Flag urgent situations prominently (risk, trial expiration, open opps) — don't bury them
  • If a meeting has very thin Common Room data, use the sparse-data format above — never fill the full template with guesses
  • Total brief should be readable in 10–15 minutes for a week with 4–6 meetings
  • Every fact must come from a tool call — no invented deal context, activity, or signals

Reference Files

  • references/briefing-guide.md — guidelines for structuring briefings, prioritization logic, and how to handle edge cases (cancelled meetings, new accounts with no data, etc.)

What ships with it: 1 file

1.8 KB alongside SKILL.md

references/

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most plan spec skills give in ~1.1k tokens

Counted across 1,099 of the 1,860 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Ask one question at a timein 51 of 1099
  • Break plans into vertical slicesin 29 of 1099, across 11 files
  • Publish issues in dependency orderin 27 of 1099, across 9 files
  • Iterate until user approves the breakdownin 25 of 1099, across 7 files
  • Explore the repository to understand the codebase statein 24 of 1099, across 7 files
  • Use domain glossary vocabularyin 23 of 1099, across 5 files
  • Apply correct triage labels to published issuesin 23 of 1099, across 5 files
  • Prefer AFK slices over HITLin 22 of 1099, across 7 files
  • Write a specification before writing any codein 22 of 1099, across 14 files
  • Write failing tests before implementation codein 22 of 1099, across 20 files
  • Ask clarifying questions until requirements are concretein 21 of 1099, across 13 files
  • Respect existing architecture decision recordsin 20 of 1099, across 5 files

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,790. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.