Technical debt assessment
Skill ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace/plugins/aj-geddes/skills/technical-debt-assessment
A curated collection of 7,800+ agent skills for Claude Desktop, sourced from skills.sh
npx -y skills add ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace --skill technical-debt-assessmentAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Assess, quantify, and prioritize technical debt using code analysis, metrics, and impact analysis. Use when planning refactoring, evaluating codebases, or making architectural decisions.
SKILL.md
2.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Technical Debt Assessment
Table of Contents
Overview
Systematically identify, measure, and manage technical debt to make informed decisions about code quality investments.
When to Use
- Legacy code evaluation
- Refactoring prioritization
- Sprint planning
- Code quality initiatives
- Acquisition due diligence
- Architectural decisions
Quick Start
Minimal working example:
interface DebtItem {
id: string;
title: string;
description: string;
category: "code" | "architecture" | "test" | "documentation" | "security";
severity: "low" | "medium" | "high" | "critical";
effort: number; // hours
impact: number; // 1-10 scale
interest: number; // cost per sprint if not fixed
}
class TechnicalDebtAssessment {
private items: DebtItem[] = [];
addDebtItem(item: DebtItem): void {
this.items.push(item);
}
calculatePriority(item: DebtItem): number {
const severityWeight = {
low: 1,
medium: 2,
high: 3,
critical: 4,
};
// ... (see reference guides for full implementation)
Reference Guides
Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:
| Guide | Contents |
|---|---|
| Technical Debt Calculator | Technical Debt Calculator |
| Code Quality Scanner | Code Quality Scanner |
Best Practices
✅ DO
- Quantify debt impact
- Prioritize by ROI
- Track debt over time
- Include debt in sprints
- Document debt decisions
- Set quality gates
❌ DON'T
- Ignore technical debt
- Fix everything at once
- Skip impact analysis
- Make emotional decisions