Clean commits
Opinionated GitHub-native development workflow with 28 skills for autonomous, issue-driven software development with Claude Code
npx -y skills add troykelly/claude-skills --skill clean-commitsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 11 stars11 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when committing code - ensures atomic, descriptive commits that leave the codebase in a merge-ready state at every point
SKILL.md
5.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Clean Commits
Overview
Every commit is atomic, descriptive, and leaves code in a working state.
Core principle: Anyone should be able to checkout any commit and have working code.
Announce at use: "I'm committing with a descriptive message following clean-commits standards."
Commit Message Format
Structure
[type](scope): Short description (max 72 chars)
[Optional body - what and why, not how]
[Optional footer - issue references, breaking changes]
Refs: #[ISSUE_NUMBER]
Types
| Type | Use For |
|---|---|
feat | New feature |
fix | Bug fix |
docs | Documentation only |
style | Formatting, no code change |
refactor | Code restructuring |
test | Adding/fixing tests |
chore | Maintenance, dependencies |
Examples
feat(auth): Add user registration endpoint
Implement POST /api/users/register with email validation,
password hashing, and duplicate detection.
- Validates email format and uniqueness
- Hashes password with bcrypt
- Returns user object without password
Refs: #123
fix(auth): Prevent redirect loop on expired session
Session expiry was triggering redirect to login, which
checked session, found expired, and redirected again.
Now clears session cookie before redirecting.
Refs: #456
test(auth): Add integration tests for registration
Cover success case, duplicate email, invalid format,
and weak password scenarios.
Refs: #123
Atomic Commits
What Makes a Commit Atomic
| Atomic | Not Atomic |
|---|---|
| One logical change | Multiple unrelated changes |
| Passes all tests | Breaks tests |
| Complete feature slice | Half-implemented feature |
| Can be reverted cleanly | Reverts would break things |
Signs of Non-Atomic Commits
- Commit message uses "and" to describe multiple things
- Diff includes unrelated files
- Some tests fail after commit
- "WIP" in commit message
Splitting Large Changes
If you have multiple changes, commit them separately:
# Stage specific files
git add src/auth/register.ts
git add src/auth/register.test.ts
git commit -m "feat(auth): Add registration endpoint"
# Stage next logical unit
git add src/auth/login.ts
git add src/auth/login.test.ts
git commit -m "feat(auth): Add login endpoint"
Working State Requirement
Every commit must leave the codebase in a state where:
- All tests pass
- Build succeeds
- Application runs
- No TypeScript errors
- No linting errors
Before committing:
# Run tests
pnpm test
# Check build
pnpm build
# Check types
pnpm typecheck
# Check lint
pnpm lint
If any fail, fix before committing.
Commit Frequency
Commit Often
- After each passing test in TDD cycle
- After each refactoring step
- After completing a logical unit
Don't Wait Too Long
| Too Infrequent | Just Right |
|---|---|
| "Implement entire feature" | "Add user model" |
| "Fix all bugs" | "Fix session expiry redirect" |
| "Update everything" | "Update auth dependencies" |
Small is Good
Smaller commits are:
- Easier to review
- Easier to revert
- Easier to bisect
- Easier to understand
The Commit Process
1. Stage Selectively
# Review what changed
git diff
# Stage specific files
git add [specific files]
# Or stage interactively
git add -p
2. Review Staged Changes
# See what will be committed
git diff --staged
3. Write Descriptive Message
# Short message (if simple)
git commit -m "fix(auth): Handle null user in session check"
# Long message (if complex)
git commit
# Opens editor for full message
4. Verify After Commit
# Check commit looks right
git show --stat
# Verify tests still pass
pnpm test
Commit Message Body
When to include a body:
- Why the change was made (not just what)
- Context that isn't obvious from code
- Trade-offs or alternatives considered
- Breaking changes if any
Body Examples
refactor(api): Extract validation middleware
Validation logic was duplicated across 12 endpoints.
Extracted to reusable middleware that can be composed.
Alternative considered: validation library.
Rejected because our rules are domain-specific.
fix(data): Use optimistic locking for updates
Race condition was causing lost updates when two users
edited the same record simultaneously.
BREAKING CHANGE: Update operations now require
version field in request body.
Issue References
Always reference the issue:
# In commit message
Refs: #123
# Or if commit closes the issue
Closes: #123
Amending Commits
When to Amend
- Typo in message (if not pushed)
- Forgot to stage a file (if not pushed)
# Amend last commit (before push only!)
git add forgotten-file.ts
git commit --amend
When NOT to Amend
- After pushing to remote
- Changing commits others have based work on
Revert, Don't Delete
If a commit was wrong:
# Create a new commit that undoes the change
git revert [commit-sha]
# DON'T rewrite history on shared branches
# DON'T force push to fix mistakes
Checklist
Before each commit:
- Tests pass
- Build succeeds
- Change is atomic (one logical unit)
- Message follows format
- Message describes why, not just what
- Issue is referenced
- No "WIP" or placeholder messages
Integration
This skill is called by:
issue-driven-development- Throughout developmentpr-creation- Before creating PR
This skill enforces:
- Reviewable history
- Revertible changes
- Clear project narrative