agentsclimarketplace

Writing goals

Skill trentsikute/skills/skills/writing-goals

Prepare a `/goal` condition that gates an autonomous agent run on a transcript-verifiable check. Use when setting up success criteria, an end-state signal, scope constraints, and a stopping budget before launching a long-running task with /goal.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add trentsikute/skills --skill writing-goals

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
  • runs commandsInstructs the agent to run 1 command, including `mktemp -t goal-XXXXXX.md`.

SKILL.md

3.3 KB, 680 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Turn a fuzzy task into a /goal condition that can be judged from the conversation transcript alone; the evaluator never runs commands at evaluation time. Refuse to write the condition until five components are concrete.

For /goal syntax, limits, and enablement, read the bundled reference for the host tool: Claude Code in references/claude-code-goal.md, Codex in references/codex-goal.md.

If the user passed an argument, treat it as their framing. Otherwise ask one sentence about the task. If the goal is a multi-module refactor, migration, or new feature and no plan.md exists, suggest the user produce one first, manually or via an installed planning skill (scan available skills by description; never invent names).

Grill these five, one focused structured question per round. Use your tool's structured-question mechanism if one is available; otherwise ask in prose with labeled (a)/(b)/(c)/Other options:

  1. End state — one observable signal: test result, exit code, file/byte count, empty queue, lint clean.
  2. Stated check — the exact CLI command + stdout pattern proving the end state from the transcript (e.g., pnpm test exits 0 with 0 failed in stdout). Reject answers that defer to model judgment ("Claude verifies", "the agent confirms"). Push for a concrete command whose stdout lands in the transcript. If the test runner is unclear, scan the project's manifest files and bias options to the user's ecosystem.
  3. Constraints — scope fence (paths in/out), quality fence (no eslint-disable, no as any, no test deleted or skipped), process fence (one logical change per commit).
  4. Disciplines — name installed skills the agent should follow throughout. Scan available skills for descriptions matching planning, test-first, diagnosis, pre-completion verification, or general hygiene; offer the matches by their actual installed names, filtered by goal type. Never invent skill names. If none match, "none" is fine.
  5. Stopping budget — a hard ceiling on how long the goal can run, in whatever unit your tool exposes: "stop after 40 turns", "stop after 2 hours", or similar (defaults: 20 for short tasks, 40 for migrations). If your tool is turn-based, check whether resuming a session resets the counter. Many do.

Demand concrete answers verifiable from transcript output. Do not infer; ask.

For long goals (>10 turns), ask whether to maintain a per-turn progress log (e.g. progress.md appended and committed per turn, recording what changed and the stated-check result). This guards against context summarization in long sessions erasing the trail. Skip for short goals.

Write the goal document with: title, the /goal condition one-liner in a fenced block, plain-English goal, the user's answers, and a one-line invocation note. Save it to a path produced by mktemp -t goal-XXXXXX.md (read the file before you write to it).

Report the file path and the /goal <condition> in a fenced code block. Do not fire /goal; the user does.

What ships with it: 3 files

4.9 KB alongside SKILL.md

agents/

references/

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.