Design system
Skill tranhieutt/software_development_department/.claude/skills/design-system
Software Development Department
npx -y skills add tranhieutt/software_development_department --skill design-systemAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Decomposes a product concept into architectural components, domain systems, data models, and integration boundaries. Use when starting system architecture or when the user mentions system design or component breakdown.
SKILL.md
4.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
System Design
Phase 1: Clarify requirements (always do this first)
Ask before designing:
- Scale: How many users/requests/day? Read-heavy or write-heavy?
- Consistency: Strong (banking) or eventual (social feed)?
- Availability target: 99.9% (8.7h/yr downtime) or 99.99% (52min/yr)?
- Latency budget: p99 < 100ms? < 1s?
- Geography: Single region or multi-region?
Capacity estimation shortcuts
1M users/day active → ~12 req/s avg, ~120 req/s peak (10x)
1KB per request → 1M req/day = ~1GB/day = ~365GB/year
Read:write ratio 10:1 (typical social) → optimize read path first
1 server handles ~1000 req/s (rule of thumb for I/O-bound services)
Component breakdown template
Client layer → Web / Mobile / API consumers
CDN → Static assets, edge caching
API Gateway → Rate limiting, auth, routing, SSL termination
Services → Domain-specific services (User, Order, Payment, Notification)
Cache → Redis for hot data (sessions, rate limits, computed results)
Database → Primary DB + Read replicas
Message queue → Async operations, event-driven decoupling
Storage → Object storage for files (S3/GCS)
Monitoring → Metrics, logs, traces, alerts
Database selection guide
| Need | Choose |
|---|---|
| ACID transactions, relations | PostgreSQL |
| High-scale document store | MongoDB |
| Key-value, cache, pub/sub | Redis |
| Time-series data | TimescaleDB / InfluxDB |
| Graph relationships | Neo4j |
| Full-text search | Elasticsearch |
| Analytical/OLAP | ClickHouse / BigQuery |
Caching strategies
Cache-aside (read): App checks cache → miss → DB → write to cache
Write-through: Write to cache AND DB simultaneously (consistent, slower writes)
Write-behind: Write to cache → async flush to DB (fast writes, risk of loss)
Read-through: Cache handles DB reads automatically
TTL guidelines:
- Sessions: 15-30 min
- User profile: 5 min
- Product catalog: 1 hour
- Config/settings: 24 hours
Message queue patterns
When to use queues:
✓ Async processing (email, PDF generation, notifications)
✓ Rate-limiting downstream services
✓ Decoupling services (order → payment → shipping)
✓ Fan-out (1 event → multiple consumers)
Queue selection:
- RabbitMQ: complex routing, request-reply, low latency
- Kafka: high throughput, event log/replay, stream processing
- SQS: managed, simple, AWS-native, at-least-once delivery
- Redis Streams: lightweight, same infra as cache
API design decisions
REST: Standard CRUD, simple clients, team familiarity (default choice)
GraphQL: Multiple clients with different data needs, reduce over-fetching
gRPC: Internal service-to-service, binary protocol, streaming needed
WebSocket: Real-time bidirectional (chat, live updates, collaborative tools)
Scaling patterns
Vertical (scale up): More CPU/RAM — quick, limited ceiling
Horizontal (scale out): More instances — requires stateless services
Database read replicas: Offload read traffic (good for 80%+ read workloads)
Database sharding: Shard by user_id, geography — last resort, complex
CQRS: Separate read/write models — when read/write patterns diverge heavily
Common design mistakes
| Mistake | Better approach |
|---|---|
| Over-engineering for scale you don't have | Start monolith, extract services at clear pain points |
| Synchronous calls to all dependencies | Use async queues for non-critical paths |
| No caching strategy | Cache at API layer + DB query results |
| Storing sessions in DB | Use Redis; DB sessions don't scale horizontally |
| Single point of failure | Redundancy at every critical layer |