Presentation engine
Skill TobiasBlask/open-paper-machine/skills/presentation-engine
An autonomous LLM research agent that executes the full academic paper pipeline — from literature search to compiled PDF
npx -y skills add TobiasBlask/open-paper-machine --skill presentation-engineAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 14 stars14 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Activate when the user needs to create conference presentation slides from a completed paper. Extracts key content, designs a slide structure, generates slide content with speaker notes, and produces a presentation-ready markdown file. Supports IS/CS conference formats (15-20 min presentations).
SKILL.md
7.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Orchestration Log: When this skill is activated, append a log entry to
outputs/orchestration_log.md:### Skill Activation: Presentation Engine **Timestamp:** [current date/time] **Actor:** AI Agent (presentation-engine) **Input:** [paper source], target format: [conference talk / workshop / poster] **Output:** presentation.md with [N] slides + speaker notes
Presentation Engine
Core Principle
A conference presentation is NOT a paper read aloud. It's a persuasion exercise: convince the audience in 15-20 minutes that your research matters, your method is sound, and your findings are interesting. This engine transforms a paper into a focused, visually driven presentation with clear narrative flow.
When to Activate
- User says "create slides", "make a presentation", "conference talk"
- User says "prepare presentation for [venue]", "slide deck"
- After paper acceptance at a conference
- User runs
/generate-slides
Prerequisites
draft.mdorlatex/paper.texexists (complete paper)figures/directory with generated figures (optional but recommended)
Step 1: EXTRACT Key Content
From Each Section
Read the paper and extract:
| Section | Extract | Max Slides |
|---|---|---|
| Title/Abstract | Title, authors, affiliations, 1-sentence summary | 1 |
| Introduction | Motivation hook, gap, RQ(s) | 2-3 |
| Theoretical Background | Key theory/framework, 1-2 core concepts | 1-2 |
| Methodology | Method name, key design choices, data summary | 2-3 |
| Results/Findings | Top 3-5 findings, key tables/figures | 4-6 |
| Discussion | Key implications (2-3), limitations (1-2) | 2-3 |
| Conclusion | Main takeaway, future directions | 1 |
What to Leave Out
- Detailed literature review (one framework slide is enough)
- Methodological minutiae (sampling details, coding tables)
- All limitations (pick the 2 most honest ones)
- Roadmap paragraph
- Most of the related work
Step 2: DESIGN Slide Structure
Standard Conference Talk (15-20 min, 15-18 slides)
## Slide Structure
1. **Title Slide** — Title, authors, affiliations, venue, date
2. **Motivation** — Why should the audience care? (practical hook)
3. **Problem / Gap** — What don't we know? What's missing?
4. **Research Question(s)** — Clear, prominent, memorable
5. **Theoretical Lens** — Key framework (1 visual if possible)
6. **Method Overview** — Approach in 3-5 bullet points + visual
7. **[Method Detail]** — Optional: sample, process, timeline
8. **Results 1** — First major finding (with figure/table)
9. **Results 2** — Second major finding
10. **Results 3** — Third major finding (or synthesis)
11. **[Results 4]** — Optional: additional finding or robustness
12. **Discussion: What This Means** — Interpretation of findings
13. **Implications** — For theory AND practice (split or combined)
14. **Limitations & Future** — Honest, brief, forward-looking
15. **Conclusion / Takeaway** — One memorable message
16. **Thank You / Q&A** — Contact info, paper reference
Short Talk (10 min, 10-12 slides)
Remove slides 6 (method detail), 11 (results 4), and merge 12-13.
Workshop / Seminar (30-45 min, 25-30 slides)
Add: deeper literature context, method details, additional findings, more discussion, interactive elements.
Step 3: GENERATE Slide Content
Format: Markdown Slides
Generate slides in Marp-compatible markdown format:
---
marp: true
theme: academic
paginate: true
---
# [Paper Title]
## [Subtitle if applicable]
**[Author 1]**, [Author 2], [Author 3]
[Affiliation(s)]
[Venue] — [Date]
---
# Motivation
[Striking opening statement or statistic]
- [Key trend 1]
- [Key trend 2]
- [Key challenge]
> "[Compelling quote or statistic]" — [Source]
<!-- speaker notes:
Open with the practical relevance. Spend 1 minute here.
Make the audience feel the problem before you state the RQ.
-->
---
# The Gap
What we **know**: [established knowledge, 2-3 points]
What we **don't know**: [specific gap]
Why it **matters**: [consequence of the gap]
<!-- speaker notes:
Transition from what we know to what's missing.
Emphasize why this gap matters for both theory and practice.
-->
---
# Research Question
> **RQ: [Research Question]**
[1-2 sentences contextualizing the question]
<!-- speaker notes:
Pause after showing the RQ. Let the audience read it.
This is the anchor of your entire talk.
-->
---
Slide Design Principles
For each slide:
- One idea per slide — never more
- Maximum 5-6 bullet points — prefer 3-4
- Maximum 7 words per bullet — use fragments, not sentences
- One figure or table per slide — large, readable
- Speaker notes for every slide — 2-5 sentences of what to say
Figure Integration
For figures from the paper:
- Reference existing
figures/fig_*.pngfiles - Recommend which figures work on slides (some are too detailed)
- Suggest simplifying complex figures for presentation
Step 4: GENERATE Speaker Notes
Speaker Note Template per Slide Type
For Motivation slides:
Open with [the hook]. Pause for effect.
Key message: [what the audience should feel/understand].
Transition: "This brings us to the question of..."
Time: ~1 minute
For Results slides:
Present [finding]. Point to [specific part of figure/table].
Explain what this means: [interpretation in plain language].
Connect to RQ: "This tells us that [answer to RQ aspect]."
If asked about [likely question]: [prepared answer].
Time: ~2 minutes per result slide
For Discussion slides:
Summarize: "So what does this mean?"
Key implication: [most important takeaway].
Compare to prior work: "Unlike [Author], we find [contrast/extension]."
Time: ~2 minutes
Step 5: SAVE Output
Output Files
| File | Content |
|---|---|
presentation/presentation.md | Marp-compatible slide deck with speaker notes |
presentation/speaker_notes.md | Standalone speaker notes (for rehearsal) |
presentation/slide_outline.md | Slide-by-slide outline (for quick reference) |
presentation/figures/ | Presentation-optimized figures (if modified) |
Checkpoint
🎤 PRESENTATION READY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Paper: "[Title]"
Format: [Conference talk / Workshop / Seminar]
Slides: [N] slides (~[N] minutes estimated)
Structure:
1-3: Introduction & Motivation
4-5: Theory & Method
6-10: Results
11-14: Discussion & Implications
15-16: Conclusion & Q&A
📁 Saved: presentation/
→ Review slides and speaker notes
→ Rehearse with speaker notes (target: [N] min)
→ Render with Marp: marp presentation.md --pdf
Error Recovery
- Paper too long for slot: Prioritize ruthlessly. Focus on 2-3 findings, not all.
- No figures in paper: Generate simple visuals for key findings via figure-engine.
- Multiple RQs: Dedicate 1 slide to listing all RQs, then focus the talk on answering the most important one.
- Paper is in German, talk in English (or vice versa): Translate key terms, keep framework names in original language.
Integration
| Scenario | Integration |
|---|---|
| After paper acceptance | Natural next step |
| Figure-engine | Generate presentation-specific visuals |
| Writing-engine | Refine speaker note language |
| Submission-engine | Presentation deadline tracking |