Backend service
Self-hosted AI coding factory — sandboxed agents deliver tickets to merged code, gated by a human in a dashboard. Local-first, cost-transparent, human-in-the-loop.
npx -y skills add tmj-90/gaffer --skill backend-serviceAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when a ticket asks for backend business logic that isn't itself an endpoint or a migration — a service/use-case, a domain operation, a background job, or orchestration across repositories. Invoke for "add a service to do X", "implement the use-case", or "extract the business logic out of the handler".
SKILL.md
2.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Add a backend service
Implement domain logic as a focused, testable service that keeps transport (HTTP) and persistence (DB) concerns at the edges, following the repo's layering.
Steps
- Read the lore first. Call
search_lore(Memory MCP) for the repo's layering (controller → service → repository), error model, transaction handling, and dependency-injection conventions. Honour any ADRs. - Find a sibling service and copy its shape — constructor/factory, injected collaborators, return/error types, and where it lives.
- Keep the service transport-agnostic. It receives validated inputs and returns domain results or typed errors — no HTTP request/response objects, no SQL strings.
- Depend on abstractions. Take repositories/clients via interfaces so the logic is unit-testable with fakes; favour immutable inputs and outputs.
- Handle failure explicitly. Map domain failures to typed errors/results; never swallow exceptions or return ambiguous nulls.
- Test the logic in isolation. Unit-test happy path, branches, and error cases with collaborators faked; add an integration test if it crosses real boundaries.
- Verify + evidence. Run tests and lint, then record
test_outputvia therecord-evidenceskill and submit for review.
Rules
- One responsibility per service; keep methods small and the file cohesive.
- No transport or storage details leaking into the service layer.
- Immutable inputs/outputs; explicit error handling, no silent failures.
- Pair with
add-api-endpointfor the HTTP edge andadd-db-migrationfor schema.
Capture lore
This skill is one of the places durable, reusable knowledge naturally surfaces:
A service-layer convention or stack rule this repo follows — error-handling shape, transaction boundary, dependency-injection pattern, or a framework gotcha. That kind of fact is lore. Capture it via the lore-capture
protocol in your brief (CLAUDE.factory.md, step 11 "Memory contribution"):
call the Memory MCP suggest_lore once at the close of your work — reusable
conventions, gotchas, decisions, and boundaries only, never per-ticket trivia.