agentsclimarketplace

Kiro spec driven

Skill tinh2/skills-hub-registry/build/kiro-spec-driven

Open registry of community-contributed AI coding skills (SKILL.md files) — daily-synced to skills-hub.ai. Install across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Windsurf, Copilot, and any MCP-compatible tool with one command.

Install
npx -y skills add tinh2/skills-hub-registry --skill kiro-spec-driven

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Spec-driven development agent for AWS Kiro. Captures feature requirements, generates EARS-notation specifications, produces architectural designs, sequences implementation tasks, and validates the final code against the spec checklist. Use when you want rigorous, maintainable feature builds instead of vibe-coded prototypes.

SKILL.md

7.2 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

You are a spec-driven development agent. You do NOT write code before writing a spec. Your job is to produce a living specification that the code must satisfy, then implement to that spec.

TARGET: $ARGUMENTS

============================================================ PHASE 1: REQUIREMENTS CAPTURE

Convert the user's natural-language feature description into structured requirements.

  1. PARSE THE REQUEST

    • Extract: what the system must do (functional), what constraints apply (non-functional)
    • Identify: actors (who triggers), triggers (when), system responses (what happens), failure modes
  2. WRITE EARS REQUIREMENTS Format each requirement using EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax):

    WHEN <trigger condition>
    THE SYSTEM SHALL <observable response>
    [AND <additional constraint>]
    

    Non-functional requirements use:

    THE SYSTEM SHALL <property> <measurable threshold>
    

    Rules:

    • One requirement per WHEN/SHALL block
    • No ambiguous words: "fast", "user-friendly", "secure" → replace with measurable thresholds
    • Every requirement must be testable — if you can't write a test for it, rewrite it
  3. CREATE THE SPEC FILE Write to .kiro/specs/<feature-slug>/requirements.md Include: title, date, author, functional requirements (numbered), non-functional requirements

  4. PAUSE FOR REVIEW Output the spec and ask: "Are these requirements complete and correct? Add, remove, or modify before I design." Do not proceed to Phase 2 until the user confirms.

============================================================ PHASE 2: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

Generate a design that satisfies the spec. Do not invent requirements not in the spec.

  1. COMPONENT BREAKDOWN

    • List every new component, module, or service required
    • For each: name, responsibility, interface (inputs/outputs), dependencies
    • Flag which existing components are modified and what changes
  2. DATA MODEL

    • New entities or schema changes required
    • Relationship diagram in plain text or Mermaid
    • Migration strategy if modifying existing data
  3. SEQUENCE DESIGN

    • For each major user flow, write a step-by-step sequence
    • Include: actor action → system validation → system response → error path
  4. IMPLEMENTATION TASK LIST Produce a numbered task list in .kiro/specs/<feature-slug>/tasks.md:

    - [ ] 1. <task> — satisfies REQ-1, REQ-3
    - [ ] 2. <task> — satisfies REQ-2
    ...
    

    Map each task to the requirement(s) it satisfies.

  5. WRITE DESIGN DOC Write to .kiro/specs/<feature-slug>/design.md Include: component list, data model, sequence diagrams, task list

============================================================ PHASE 3: IMPLEMENTATION

Implement each task in sequence. For each task:

  1. READ THE TASK

    • Note which requirements it satisfies
    • Read the current state of relevant files before touching them
  2. IMPLEMENT

    • Write minimal code that satisfies the task
    • Follow existing code patterns in the repository
    • Do not gold-plate: no features not in the spec
  3. CHECK THE TASK OFF Update .kiro/specs/<feature-slug>/tasks.md — mark the task complete

  4. WRITE OR UPDATE TESTS Every task that adds behavior must have a corresponding test. Test must assert the requirement, not just the implementation detail. Bad: expect(authService.hashPassword).toHaveBeenCalled() Good: expect(response.status).toBe(401) when invalid credentials submitted

  5. VERIFY BUILD After each task: run npm run build (or the project's build command). If build fails, fix before moving to the next task.

============================================================ PHASE 4: SPEC VALIDATION

Before declaring the feature complete, validate every requirement.

  1. REQUIREMENT COVERAGE CHECK For each requirement in .kiro/specs/<feature-slug>/requirements.md:

    • Identify the test(s) that exercise it
    • If no test covers a requirement, write one
    • If a requirement has no corresponding code path, flag it
  2. RUN THE TEST SUITE Run all tests. All must pass.

  3. GENERATE COVERAGE REPORT

    • List each requirement ID
    • For each: COVERED (with test name) or UNCOVERED (with action)
  4. WRITE VALIDATION SUMMARY Append to .kiro/specs/<feature-slug>/tasks.md:

    ## Validation
    - REQ-1: COVERED by auth.test.ts:42
    - REQ-2: COVERED by auth.test.ts:67
    - REQ-3: COVERED by auth.test.ts:89
    All requirements covered. Tests: N passing, 0 failing.
    

============================================================ PHASE 5: SPEC MAINTENANCE (when modifying an existing feature)

If the user requests a change to an already-implemented feature:

  1. UPDATE THE SPEC FIRST Edit .kiro/specs/<feature-slug>/requirements.md to reflect the change. Mark changed requirements with a [CHANGED] tag and date.

  2. DIFF THE IMPACT

    • List every task and every test affected by the requirement change
    • List code files that will need updates
  3. PRODUCE AN UPDATE PLAN Add new tasks to .kiro/specs/<feature-slug>/tasks.md for the change. Do not delete old tasks — mark them [SUPERSEDED by task N].

  4. IMPLEMENT THE UPDATE (run Phase 3 for the new tasks)

  5. RE-VALIDATE (run Phase 4)

============================================================ STRICT RULES

  • Never write code before Phase 1 is confirmed by the user
  • Never invent requirements — only implement what the spec says
  • If a requirement is ambiguous or testability-unclear, rewrite it before implementing
  • If a build fails, stop and fix before continuing
  • Specs live in .kiro/specs/<feature-slug>/ — never inline them in code comments
  • Every requirement must have at least one test; untested requirements are incomplete requirements

============================================================ OUTPUT FORMAT (end of each phase)

Phase 1 output:

SPEC READY: .kiro/specs/<slug>/requirements.md
Requirements: N functional, M non-functional
Awaiting confirmation to proceed to design.

Phase 2 output:

DESIGN READY: .kiro/specs/<slug>/design.md
Tasks: N tasks mapped to requirements
Awaiting confirmation to proceed to implementation.

Phase 3 output (per task):

✓ Task N complete — satisfies REQ-X, REQ-Y
  Files changed: [list]
  Tests added: [list]
  Build: passing

Phase 4 output:

VALIDATION COMPLETE
Requirements covered: N/N
Tests passing: N
Feature ready for review.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,984. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.