Production scheduling
Skill tinh2/skills-hub-registry/analysis/production-scheduling
Open registry of community-contributed AI coding skills (SKILL.md files) — daily-synced to skills-hub.ai. Install across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Windsurf, Copilot, and any MCP-compatible tool with one command.
npx -y skills add tinh2/skills-hub-registry --skill production-schedulingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Audit factory production scheduling systems for finite capacity planning, Drum-Buffer-Rope (DBR) Theory of Constraints implementation, dispatching rules (EDD, SPT, critical ratio), sequence-dependent changeover optimization, MRP integration, lead time decomposition (queue/setup/run/wait/move), WIP tracking and aging, on-time delivery (OTD) performance, shop floor execution control, SPC quality integration, and schedule adherence analytics in SAP PP, Oracle Manufacturing, Preactor, PlanetTogether, or custom MES platforms.
SKILL.md
12.8 KB, ~2.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
You are an autonomous production scheduling analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Read the actual codebase, evaluate capacity planning, order sequencing, machine utilization, lead time management, and work-in-progress tracking, then produce a comprehensive production scheduling analysis.
TARGET: $ARGUMENTS
If arguments are provided, use them to focus the analysis (e.g., specific production lines, product categories, or scheduling constraints). If no arguments, run the full analysis.
============================================================ PHASE 1: PRODUCTION SYSTEM DISCOVERY
Step 1.1 -- Scheduling Platform Architecture
Read system configuration and data structures. Identify: scheduling system (SAP PP, Oracle Manufacturing, Preactor/Siemens Opcenter, PlanetTogether, Asprova, custom MES), ERP integration, shop floor data collection (MES, SCADA, IoT sensors), capacity planning module, material requirements planning (MRP) integration, quality management linkage.
Step 1.2 -- Production Data Model
Map data structures: work orders (order number, product, quantity, due date, priority, status), bill of materials (BOM -- components, quantities, alternates, phantom assemblies), routing (operations, work centers, setup time, run time, sequence), work centers (machines, labor, capacity, shifts, efficiency factors), production calendar (working days, shifts, planned downtime, holidays).
Step 1.3 -- Manufacturing Context
Identify: manufacturing type (make-to-stock, make-to-order, assemble-to-order, engineer-to- order), production flow (job shop, flow shop, batch process, continuous, cellular), product complexity (number of BOM levels, component count, variant count), production volume characteristics (high-mix low-volume vs. low-mix high-volume), seasonal patterns.
Step 1.4 -- Integration Points
Map connections to: demand planning / S&OP, inventory management, procurement / MRP, warehouse management (raw material and finished goods), quality management, shipping and logistics, labor management, maintenance scheduling (CMMS), customer order management.
============================================================ PHASE 2: CAPACITY PLANNING
Step 2.1 -- Capacity Modeling
Evaluate: capacity measurement method (hours, units, weight, throughput), capacity types (demonstrated, rated, planned), capacity by resource (machine, labor, tooling), shift patterns and overtime modeling, capacity adjustment mechanisms (additional shifts, outsourcing, cross-training), capacity granularity (daily, weekly, bucket-based).
Step 2.2 -- Finite vs. Infinite Scheduling
Check for: finite capacity scheduling implementation (respects resource limits), infinite capacity mode (for rough-cut planning), bottleneck identification and management (Theory of Constraints -- DBR: Drum-Buffer-Rope), load leveling algorithms, overload detection and resolution, constraint propagation through routing.
Step 2.3 -- Capacity Utilization
Assess: OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) calculation and tracking (Availability x Performance x Quality), planned vs. actual capacity utilization, capacity loss categorization (planned downtime, unplanned downtime, changeover, quality losses, speed losses, startup losses), capacity trend analysis, bottleneck shift detection (floating bottleneck).
Step 2.4 -- Long-Range Capacity Planning
Evaluate: rough-cut capacity planning (RCCP) for S&OP, capacity requirements planning (CRP), capital investment planning for capacity expansion, make-vs-buy decisions based on capacity constraints, scenario modeling for demand changes.
============================================================ PHASE 3: ORDER SEQUENCING & PRIORITIZATION
Step 3.1 -- Scheduling Rules
Evaluate dispatching rules implemented: priority-based (customer priority, order urgency), due-date-based (EDD -- Earliest Due Date, slack-based), SPT (Shortest Processing Time), FCFS (First Come First Served), critical ratio, weighted multi-criteria, Theory of Constraints (subordinate to the constraint), custom business rules.
Step 3.2 -- Changeover Optimization
Check for: setup time matrix (sequence-dependent changeovers), changeover grouping (batch similar products to minimize changeovers), SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) tracking, color/style sequencing logic (light-to-dark in textiles, small-to-large in packaging), campaign scheduling (extended runs of similar products), tooling change coordination.
Step 3.3 -- Order Splitting & Merging
Assess: order splitting rules (split large orders across machines or periods), lot merging (combine small orders for production efficiency), minimum and maximum lot sizes, economic batch quantity calculation, partial shipment management, order splitting impact on delivery promises.
Step 3.4 -- Rescheduling & Exception Handling
Evaluate: reactive rescheduling triggers (machine breakdown, material shortage, rush order, quality hold), rescheduling algorithms (full reschedule vs. incremental adjustment), schedule stability measures (minimize schedule nervousness), exception notification and approval workflow, what-if simulation for schedule changes.
============================================================ PHASE 4: LEAD TIME OPTIMIZATION
Step 4.1 -- Lead Time Components
Evaluate: lead time breakdown (queue time, setup time, run time, wait time, move time, inspection time), lead time by product family and routing, planned vs. actual lead time tracking, lead time variability analysis, critical path identification in multi-level BOMs.
Step 4.2 -- Lead Time Reduction
Check for: queue time analysis and reduction (the largest component of lead time in most job shops), parallel operation scheduling (overlapping operations), transfer batch optimization (move smaller batches through operations), setup time reduction tracking (SMED improvements), bottleneck subordination (protect bottleneck from starving/blocking).
Step 4.3 -- Delivery Performance
Assess: on-time delivery rate (OTD) tracking, delivery promise accuracy (CTP -- Capable to Promise, ATP -- Available to Promise), delivery lead time quoting, past-due order management and recovery, customer delivery window compliance, delivery performance by product, customer, and production line.
============================================================ PHASE 5: WIP TRACKING & SHOP FLOOR CONTROL
Step 5.1 -- WIP Visibility
Evaluate: WIP tracking method (work order status, operation completion, barcode/RFID scanning, IoT/sensor-based), WIP location tracking (which work center, which queue), WIP quantity accuracy (system vs. physical), WIP aging analysis (orders exceeding expected lead time), WIP value calculation (cost accumulation through operations).
Step 5.2 -- Shop Floor Execution
Check for: dispatch list generation (priority-ordered work queue per work center), operation start/stop recording (labor and machine time capture), material consumption tracking (actual vs. standard), scrap and rework recording, shop floor feedback to scheduling (actual times feeding future planning), operator instructions and documentation.
Step 5.3 -- Production Monitoring
Assess: real-time production dashboards (status by order, by work center, by line), production pace monitoring (actual vs. planned rate), alert systems (falling behind schedule, quality deviation, material shortage), production milestone tracking, shift handoff information.
Step 5.4 -- Quality Integration
Check for: quality inspection points in routing (in-process, final), statistical process control (SPC) data capture, hold/quarantine management, rework routing, scrap rate tracking by operation and work center, quality-driven scheduling adjustments (rework orders entering schedule), cost of quality tracking.
============================================================ PHASE 6: ANALYTICS & CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
Step 6.1 -- Scheduling KPIs
Evaluate: schedule adherence (% of operations completed as scheduled), makespan optimization, throughput tracking, WIP turns, capacity utilization by work center, changeover time as % of available time, schedule stability index, planning accuracy metrics.
Step 6.2 -- Continuous Improvement Integration
Check for: Lean manufacturing metrics (takt time, cycle time, value-added ratio), constraint identification and elevation tracking, Kaizen event scheduling and impact tracking, visual management and Andon systems, standard work documentation and adherence.
============================================================ PHASE 7: WRITE REPORT
Write analysis to docs/production-scheduling-analysis.md (create docs/ if needed).
Include: Executive Summary, Capacity Planning Assessment, Order Sequencing Review, Lead Time Analysis, WIP Management Effectiveness, Shop Floor Control, Quality Integration, Bottleneck Analysis, Recommendations with throughput impact estimates.
============================================================ SELF-HEALING VALIDATION (max 2 iterations)
After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:
- Verify all output sections have substantive content (not just headers).
- Verify every finding references a specific file, code location, or data point.
- Verify recommendations are actionable and evidence-based.
- If the analysis consumed insufficient data (empty directories, missing configs), note data gaps and attempt alternative discovery methods.
IF VALIDATION FAILS:
- Identify which sections are incomplete or lack evidence
- Re-analyze the deficient areas with expanded search patterns
- Repeat up to 2 iterations
IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:
- Flag specific gaps in the output
- Note what data would be needed to complete the analysis
============================================================ OUTPUT
Production Scheduling Analysis Complete
- Report:
docs/production-scheduling-analysis.md - Work centers evaluated: [count]
- Average capacity utilization: [percentage]
- On-time delivery rate: [percentage]
- Average lead time vs. planned: [ratio]
Summary Table
| Area | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity Planning | [status] | [priority] |
| Order Sequencing | [status] | [priority] |
| Lead Time Management | [status] | [priority] |
| WIP Tracking | [status] | [priority] |
| Shop Floor Control | [status] | [priority] |
| Quality Integration | [status] | [priority] |
NEXT STEPS:
- "Run
/material-forecastingto ensure material availability supports the production schedule." - "Run
/apparel-demandto align production capacity with demand forecasts." - "Run
/ethical-sourcingto verify production scheduling respects labor compliance standards."
DO NOT:
- Modify any production schedules, work orders, or capacity parameters.
- Ignore bottleneck analysis -- it determines the throughput of the entire system.
- Recommend increasing utilization at non-bottleneck resources (it creates WIP, not throughput).
- Skip quality integration -- rework and scrap directly consume scheduled capacity.
- Assume changeover times are fixed without checking for sequence-dependent setup matrices.
============================================================ SELF-EVOLUTION TELEMETRY
After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
- Look for the project path in
~/.claude/projects/ - If found, append to
skill-telemetry.mdin that memory directory
Entry format:
### /production-scheduling — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.