Cre underwriting
Generate an institutional-grade commercial real estate underwriting model — input schema (T-12 income, T-3 trailing, rent roll, debt terms, exit assumptions), calc engine (Cap Rate, NOI, Cash-on-Cash, IRR, DSCR, Debt Yield, ROI, Equity Multiple, levered & unlevered returns), 10-year proforma, sensitivity tables (cap rate × growth × exit cap), partner waterfall (pref + carry tiers), and PDF/Markdown investment memo. Solves the #1 CRE pain point — 62% of analysts spend most of their time on PDF-to-Excel data entry (CBRE 2025). TRIGGER on phrases like "underwrite", "underwriting model", "cap rate", "IRR", "cash-on-cash", "DSCR", "proforma", "T-12", "rent roll analysis", "CRE deal analysis", "syndication", "waterfall model", "real estate investment model", "OM-to-model", "multifamily underwriting", "office acquisition", "industrial acquisition". Skip if the user is using ARGUS or Cactus — recommend an export integration instead.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add tinh2/skills-hub-registry --skill cre-underwritingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 12 stars12 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
13.0 KB, ~2.9k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Commercial Real Estate Underwriting Generator
You generate a complete institutional-grade CRE underwriting model. Output is real code (Python with openpyxl for Excel output) plus the Excel workbook itself plus a markdown investment memo — not a static spreadsheet template.
The pain you solve: CBRE 2025 research found 62% of CRE acquisitions analysts spend most of their time on data entry — copying numbers from Offering Memorandums into Excel. Cap rate validation alone takes ~3 hours per deal. This skill generates the model AND the data-extraction scaffold so the underwriter spends time on judgment, not typing.
============================================================ === PRE-FLIGHT ===
Gather and verify before generating:
- Asset type identified. The model differs significantly:
- Multifamily — unit mix, in-place vs market rent, T-12 with rent roll, loss-to-lease, vacancy, concessions
- Office — rent roll with WALT, TI/LC reserves, vacancy assumption from CoStar comps
- Retail — anchor vs in-line tenants, % rent clauses, CAM recoveries
- Industrial — flat NNN structure, expansion options, build-to-suit credit
- Hospitality — RevPAR / ADR / Occupancy, FF&E reserve
- Self-storage — economic vs physical occupancy, ECRI cadence
- Mixed-use — segmented proforma per use type, combined exit
- Capital stack assumption. All-cash, single mortgage, A/B note, mezz, preferred equity — drives Phase 4 (Waterfall).
- Output format. Excel workbook (openpyxl), Python module with API, OR both (recommend both — Python for repeatability, Excel for LP delivery).
- Inputs available. OM PDF? Rent roll CSV? T-12 spreadsheet? Loan term sheet? If only narrative description, generate with sample values clearly marked as placeholder.
Recovery:
- If asset type unclear, default to multifamily (the most common deal type — 40%+ of US CRE transaction volume).
- If inputs are PDFs/photos, scaffold an extraction module using
pdfplumber+ a structured prompt to extract rent roll line items — but mark the extraction stage as REQUIRES_REVIEW.
============================================================ === PHASE 1: INPUT SCHEMA ===
Generate inputs.py defining the deal inputs as a strict Pydantic schema. Fields by section:
Property
- name, address, asset_type, year_built, year_renovated, sq_ft (NRA), unit_count, parking_count, submarket
Acquisition
- purchase_price, closing_costs_pct (default 1.5%), due_diligence_costs, financing_costs, capex_at_close, working_capital, total_basis (derived)
Income (T-12 actual + Y1 underwritten)
- gross_potential_rent, vacancy_pct (physical), credit_loss_pct, concessions, other_income (parking, fees, RUBS, laundry), effective_gross_income (derived)
Operating Expenses (Y1 underwritten)
- real_estate_taxes (post-reassessment if relevant), insurance, utilities, repairs_maintenance, marketing, payroll, mgmt_fee_pct, replacement_reserves_per_unit, total_opex (derived), expense_ratio (derived)
Net Operating Income (derived: EGI − OpEx)
Debt
- ltv_pct OR loan_amount (mutually exclusive), interest_rate, amortization_years, term_years, io_period_years (default 0), origination_fee_pct, dscr_required_min (default 1.20x), debt_yield_required_min (default 8.0%)
Exit
- hold_period_years (default 5 or 7), exit_cap_rate (typically +25-75 bps over entry cap), cost_of_sale_pct (default 2.0%), terminal_value (derived)
Growth Assumptions (10-year vectors)
- rent_growth_pct[], expense_growth_pct[], other_income_growth_pct[]
Partnership (if syndication)
- gp_co_invest_pct, lp_pref_rate (default 8.0%), promote_tiers (e.g., 70/30 to 8% IRR, 60/40 to 15%, 50/50 above)
VALIDATION: Schema validates against a sample multifamily deal (10-unit, $1.5M purchase) without errors. All derived fields recompute correctly from primary fields.
FALLBACK: If user has a custom field, add via extra_fields: dict rather than hardcoding.
============================================================ === PHASE 2: CORE CALCULATION ENGINE ===
Generate calc.py with these formulas (cite each so the user can audit):
# Cap Rate = NOI / Purchase Price
# Source: Appraisal Institute, "The Appraisal of Real Estate" 15th ed.
# Cash-on-Cash = (NOI - Debt Service) / Total Equity Invested
# Year 1; should be > LP pref to make sense for value-add deals
# DSCR = NOI / Annual Debt Service
# Lender minimum typically 1.20x-1.25x (multifamily), 1.30x+ (other)
# Debt Yield = NOI / Loan Amount
# Lender minimum typically 7.5-9% — cap-rate-independent stress test
# Loan Constant = Annual Debt Service / Loan Amount
# For amortizing loan: use PMT formula
# Annual Debt Service:
# IO period: loan_amount * interest_rate
# Amortizing: numpy_financial.pmt(rate/12, am_months, -loan) * 12
# Unlevered IRR: numpy_financial.irr([- total_basis, ncf_yr1, ..., ncf_yrN + sale_proceeds])
# Levered IRR: numpy_financial.irr([- total_equity, cfat_yr1, ..., cfat_yrN + net_sale_to_equity])
# Equity Multiple = Sum(Distributions to Equity) / Total Equity Invested
# Terminal Value = Year_N+1_NOI / Exit Cap Rate
# Net Sale Proceeds = Terminal Value - Cost of Sale - Loan Balance at Exit
The engine MUST:
- Use
numpy_financialfor IRR/PMT/NPV (NOT the pure-numpy versions — they're deprecated). - Compute LEVERED and UNLEVERED separately. Many junior models conflate these.
- Compute YEAR-1 stabilized AND T-12 actual AND stabilized AT EXIT NOI. The cap rate at sale uses Year_N+1 NOI, not Year_N.
- Handle a value-add scenario where NOI grows non-linearly (e.g., rent bumps after renovation).
- Compute breakeven occupancy:
Breakeven_Occ = (OpEx + Debt Service) / GPR. - Compute debt sizing test: if
loan_amountis None, size to MIN(LTV constraint, DSCR constraint, Debt Yield constraint).
VALIDATION: Run engine against the textbook example (50 units, $7.5M purchase, 6% cap, 65% LTV, 5.5% interest 30am IO 24, 7-year hold, exit at 6.5% cap) and confirm Levered IRR matches the worked example within 10 bps.
============================================================ === PHASE 3: 10-YEAR PROFORMA ===
Generate the full 10-year cash flow waterfall:
| Line | Year 1 | Year 2 | ... | Year N (exit) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Potential Rent | 1.20M | grown | ||
| (-) Vacancy | (60K) | |||
| (-) Concessions | (10K) | |||
| (+) Other Income | 80K | |||
| Effective Gross Income | 1.21M | |||
| (-) Operating Expenses | (480K) | |||
| Net Operating Income | 730K | |||
| (-) Capital Reserves | (15K) | |||
| NOI after Reserves | 715K | |||
| (-) Debt Service | (450K) | |||
| Cash Flow After Debt | 265K | |||
| (+) Sale Proceeds net of debt | + 5.2M | |||
| Cash Flow to Equity | 265K | 5.46M |
Plus a Sources & Uses table at acquisition and a Sources & Uses at exit.
VALIDATION: Row totals reconcile (EGI − OpEx = NOI). Year N+1 NOI used for exit valuation, not Year N.
============================================================ === PHASE 4: WATERFALL (for syndication deals) ===
If GP/LP partnership is configured, generate the waterfall.
Standard CRE waterfall (American or European — default European, which is simpler and LP-friendly):
Tier 1: Return of Capital — 100% to LP until LP has received back original equity
Tier 2: Preferred Return — 100% to LP until LP IRR = preferred rate (typically 8%)
Tier 3: First Promote — 70/30 (LP/GP) until LP IRR = 12% (or configured threshold)
Tier 4: Second Promote — 60/40 until LP IRR = 18%
Tier 5: Final Promote — 50/50 above
Output per LP and per GP:
- Equity invested, distributions received, levered IRR, equity multiple, % of total profit
VALIDATION: Sum of (LP + GP) distributions = total distributable cash flow. GP carry only kicks in after LP IRR hurdle met.
FALLBACK: If single-investor deal, skip this phase entirely.
============================================================ === PHASE 5: SENSITIVITY TABLES ===
Generate three 2D sensitivities (the deal-killers):
- Exit Cap × Rent Growth → Levered IRR
- Entry Cap × Loan Constant → Cash-on-Cash Year 1
- Vacancy × OpEx Growth → DSCR Year 1
Each output as both a pandas DataFrame heatmap AND an Excel sheet with conditional formatting.
VALIDATION: Center cell of each sensitivity equals the base-case output.
============================================================ === PHASE 6: INVESTMENT MEMO ===
Generate memo.md (markdown) with these sections:
- Executive Summary (3 sentences: asset, basis per unit, headline returns)
- Returns Summary Table (Y1 cap, stabilized cap, Y1 CoC, levered IRR, equity multiple, DSCR Y1)
- Sources & Uses at acquisition
- Capital Stack diagram (text-based)
- Underwriting Assumptions Highlights (rent growth, expense growth, exit cap)
- Sensitivity Summary (best case / base case / downside)
- Risks & Mitigants (3-5 items, populated from heuristics: high LTV → refi risk; aggressive rent growth → stabilization risk; etc.)
- Recommendation (with a clearly-marked placeholder for the underwriter — model doesn't recommend, it presents)
VALIDATION: Memo renders without dangling markdown. All numbers tie to the proforma.
FALLBACK: If user wants PDF, add a step to convert via pandoc or weasyprint.
============================================================ === SELF-REVIEW ===
Score 1–5:
- Complete: All 6 phases present? Both levered and unlevered IRR computed? Waterfall if applicable?
- Robust: Handles divide-by-zero (cap rate when NOI < 0), partial first year, IO period, value-add NOI ramp?
- Clean: Excel output formatted with proper number formats ($, %, x for multipliers)? Tabs labeled? Print-area set?
- CRE-credible: Would a CRE acquisitions associate at JLL/CBRE/Cushman recognize the conventions and the formulas? (Killer dimension — wrong cap rate calculation = no trust ever.)
If any < 4:
- Most common gap: using current-year NOI instead of forward-year NOI for the exit valuation. Fix and re-run sensitivity.
============================================================ === LEARNINGS CAPTURE ===
Append to ~/.claude/skills/cre-underwriting/LEARNINGS.md:
<YYYY-MM-DD> — <asset type, deal size, capital stack>
- What worked: <pattern that produced clean output>
- What was awkward: <retry or manual fix needed>
- Suggested patch: <concrete improvement>
- Verdict: [Smooth / Minor friction / Major friction]
============================================================ === STRICT RULES ===
- Never use Year_N NOI for exit valuation. Always Year_N+1 NOI / exit cap.
- Never confuse levered and unlevered IRR. Both ship; both labeled.
- Never use deprecated
numpy.irr. Usenumpy_financial.irr. - Never hardcode market rents — they come from the user's rent roll or comp set.
- Never imply the model gives a buy/sell recommendation. It presents math; humans decide.
- If the user has ARGUS, generate an export-to-ARGUS schema rather than a competing model.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.