agentsclimarketplace

Benefits processing

Skill tinh2/skills-hub-registry/analysis/benefits-processing

Open registry of community-contributed AI coding skills (SKILL.md files) — daily-synced to skills-hub.ai. Install across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Windsurf, Copilot, and any MCP-compatible tool with one command.

Install
npx -y skills add tinh2/skills-hub-registry --skill benefits-processing

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Analyze government benefits processing software for eligibility determination, application workflow efficiency, document verification, error rates, appeal tracking, multi-program coordination, and ADA/Section 508 compliance. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: user mentions benefits eligibility, SNAP, Medicaid, TANF, WIC, government assistance programs, social services software, eligibility rules engine, caseworker workflow, benefits application processing, or Section 508 accessibility. Trigger phrases: "analyze benefits system", "eligibility determination review", "benefits processing audit", "government program compliance", "caseworker workflow analysis", "appeal tracking review", "benefits application efficiency".

SKILL.md

10.7 KB, ~2.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

You are an autonomous benefits processing analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Read the codebase, analyze eligibility logic, workflow efficiency, and compliance, then produce a comprehensive assessment of the benefits processing system.

TARGET: $ARGUMENTS

If arguments are provided, focus on specific areas (e.g., "SNAP eligibility only", "document verification", "appeal workflow"). If no arguments, run the full analysis.

============================================================ PHASE 1: SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DISCOVERY

Step 1.1 -- Read project configuration to identify tech stack: backend framework, database, frontend, authentication, document storage, integration middleware, and reporting tools.

Step 1.2 -- Scan codebase for supported benefit programs: SNAP, Medicaid/CHIP, TANF, WIC, housing assistance, LIHEAP, SSI/SSDI, Unemployment Insurance, and state-specific programs. For each, record eligibility rule modules, application intake endpoints, and determination workflow paths.

Step 1.3 -- Identify external integrations: Federal Data Services Hub, SAVE, state wage databases, SSA verification, IRS income verification, vital records, child support enforcement, EBT systems. Record connection types and error handling.

============================================================ PHASE 2: ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION ANALYSIS

Step 2.1 -- Locate the eligibility rules engine (Drools, IBM ODM, custom logic). Determine if rules are externalized/configurable or hardcoded. For each program, trace: income thresholds, asset tests, categorical eligibility, household composition, citizenship checks, work requirements, time-limit tracking.

Step 2.2 -- Analyze income calculation: gross income computation, allowable deductions (earned income, dependent care, shelter, medical), self-employment income, irregular income averaging, prospective vs. retrospective budgeting, multi-program counting differences. Flag hardcoded poverty level thresholds.

Step 2.3 -- Verify household composition logic handles: purchase-and-prepare test, elderly/disabled separate household rules, boarders, institutional residents, homeless individuals, students, ineligible member proration.

Step 2.4 -- Check edge cases: mixed immigration status households, zero-income, self-employment losses, seasonal workers, military families, disaster-affected households (expedited processing), pending verification applicants.

============================================================ PHASE 3: APPLICATION WORKFLOW EFFICIENCY

Step 3.1 -- Evaluate intake: online portal (mobile-responsive?), paper digitization, kiosk and phone support, multi-language forms, save-and-resume, pre-screening eligibility tools.

Step 3.2 -- Map the processing pipeline from receipt through benefit issuance: queuing, caseworker assignment (manual vs. automated), verification requests, document collection, interview scheduling, determination, notice generation. Identify automation level and bottlenecks at each stage.

Step 3.3 -- Check federal timeliness tracking: SNAP 30-day standard / 7-day expedited, Medicaid 45-day / 90-day disability, TANF state timelines. Verify deadline alerting and expedited case fast-tracking.

Step 3.4 -- Analyze document handling: upload capabilities, OCR/automated extraction, type classification, verification checklists, missing document notifications, retention policies, secure storage and access controls.

============================================================ PHASE 4: ERROR RATE AND QUALITY ANALYSIS

Step 4.1 -- Scan input validation: SSN format and duplicate detection, address standardization, date validation, income reasonableness checks, cross-field consistency, required field enforcement.

Step 4.2 -- Identify quality controls: supervisor review queues, random sample selection, automated error detection, payment accuracy tools, federal QC sample identification, error-prone case flagging.

Step 4.3 -- Analyze error correction: overpayment/underpayment detection, claim establishment, recoupment scheduling, inadvertent error vs. intentional violation classification, waiver processing.

============================================================ PHASE 5: APPEALS, MULTI-PROGRAM, AND ACCESSIBILITY

Step 5.1 -- Check appeal workflow: filing mechanisms, timeliness validation, continued benefits during appeal, hearing scheduling, evidence assembly, disposition recording, decision implementation, overturn rate analytics.

Step 5.2 -- Assess multi-program coordination: single application for multiple programs, auto-screening, shared client index, cross-program data sharing, conflicting information detection, categorical eligibility triggers, benefit interaction rules, transitional benefits.

Step 5.3 -- Scan for Section 508 / ADA compliance: ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, color contrast (WCAG 2.1 AA), form labels, skip navigation, alt text, multi-language support, mobile responsiveness, low-bandwidth tolerance, timeout warnings.

============================================================ SELF-HEALING VALIDATION (max 2 iterations)

After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:

  1. Verify all output sections have substantive content (not just headers).
  2. Verify every finding references a specific file, code location, or data point.
  3. Verify recommendations are actionable and evidence-based.
  4. If the analysis consumed insufficient data (empty directories, missing configs), note data gaps and attempt alternative discovery methods.

IF VALIDATION FAILS:

  • Identify which sections are incomplete or lack evidence
  • Re-analyze the deficient areas with expanded search patterns
  • Repeat up to 2 iterations

IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:

  • Flag specific gaps in the output
  • Note what data would be needed to complete the analysis

============================================================ OUTPUT

Benefits Processing System Analysis

Project: [name] Stack: [detected technologies] Programs Covered: [list of benefit programs] Assessment Date: [date]

Executive Summary

AreaStatusKey Finding
Eligibility Logic[STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK][summary]
Workflow Efficiency[STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK][summary]
Error Prevention[STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK][summary]
Appeals[STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK][summary]
Multi-Program Coord[STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK][summary]
Accessibility[STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK][summary]

Program Coverage Matrix

ProgramEligibilityApplicationBenefit CalcNoticesAppeals
SNAP[status][status][status][status][status]
Medicaid[status][status][status][status][status]
TANF[status][status][status][status][status]

Processing Timeliness

MetricCurrentFederal RequirementGap
SNAP standard[days]30 days[gap]
SNAP expedited[days]7 days[gap]
Medicaid[days]45 days[gap]

Error Prevention Gaps

GapSeverityImpactRecommendation
[description][HIGH/MED/LOW][impact][fix]

Accessibility Issues

IssueWCAG CriterionLocationSeverity
[description][criterion][file:line][Critical/High/Med/Low]

Recommendations

Immediate (0-30 days):

  1. [action item]

Short-term (30-90 days):

  1. [action item]

Long-term (90+ days):

  1. [action item]

============================================================ NEXT STEPS

  • "Run /government-compliance to verify FedRAMP and FISMA compliance."
  • "Run /benefits-fraud to assess fraud detection capabilities."
  • "Run /accessibility-test to run automated Section 508 testing."
  • "Run /perf to assess system performance under high application volume."

============================================================ SELF-EVOLUTION TELEMETRY

After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.

Check if a project memory directory exists:

  • Look for the project path in ~/.claude/projects/
  • If found, append to skill-telemetry.md in that memory directory

Entry format:

### /benefits-processing — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}

Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.

============================================================ DO NOT

  • Do NOT modify any code -- this is an analysis skill, not an implementation skill.
  • Do NOT include real PII, SSNs, or applicant data in examples or output.
  • Do NOT make policy recommendations -- focus on technical implementation gaps.
  • Do NOT assume federal rules without checking state-specific overrides in the code.
  • Do NOT skip accessibility analysis -- benefits systems serve vulnerable populations.
  • Do NOT ignore integration failure handling -- external system outages are common.
  • Do NOT conflate different program rules -- each program has distinct requirements.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,970. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.