Prompt creator
Agent Skills collection — Reusable capabilities for AI coding agents. Install: npx skills add TheWatcher01/skills
npx -y skills add TheWatcher01/skills --skill prompt-creatorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Expert prompt engineering for creating effective prompts for Claude, GPT, and other LLMs. Use when writing system prompts, user prompts, few-shot examples, or optimizing existing prompts for better performance.
SKILL.md
7.8 KB, ~1.8k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Every prompt created should be clear, specific, and optimized for the target model. </objective>
<quick_start> <workflow>
- Clarify purpose: What should the prompt accomplish?
- Identify model: Claude, GPT, or other (techniques vary slightly)
- Select techniques: Choose from core techniques based on task complexity
- Structure content: Use XML tags (Claude) or markdown (GPT) for organization
- Add examples: Include few-shot examples for format-sensitive outputs
- Define success: Add clear success criteria
- Test and iterate: Refine based on outputs </workflow>
<core_structure> Every effective prompt has:
<context>
Background information the model needs
</context>
<task>
Clear, specific instruction of what to do
</task>
<requirements>
- Specific constraints
- Output format
- Edge cases to handle
</requirements>
<examples>
Input/output pairs demonstrating expected behavior
</examples>
<success_criteria>
How to know the task was completed correctly
</success_criteria>
</core_structure> </quick_start>
<core_techniques> <technique name="be_clear_and_direct"> Priority: Always apply first
- State exactly what you want
- Avoid ambiguous language ("try to", "maybe", "generally")
- Use "Always..." or "Never..." instead of "Should probably..."
- Provide specific output format requirements
See: references/clarity-principles.md </technique>
<technique name="use_xml_tags"> **When**: Claude prompts, complex structure neededClaude was trained with XML tags. Use them for:
- Separating sections:
<context>,<task>,<output> - Wrapping data:
<document>,<schema>,<example> - Defining boundaries: Clear start/end of sections
See: references/xml-structure.md </technique>
<technique name="few_shot_examples"> **When**: Output format matters, pattern recognition easier than rulesProvide 2-4 input/output pairs:
<examples>
<example number="1">
<input>User clicked signup button</input>
<output>track('signup_initiated', { source: 'homepage' })</output>
</example>
</examples>
See: references/few-shot-patterns.md </technique>
<technique name="chain_of_thought"> **When**: Complex reasoning, math, multi-step analysisAdd explicit reasoning instructions:
- "Think step by step before answering"
- "First analyze X, then consider Y, finally conclude Z"
- Use
<thinking>tags for Claude's extended thinking
See: references/reasoning-techniques.md </technique>
<technique name="system_prompts"> **When**: Setting persistent behavior, role, constraintsSystem prompts set the foundation:
- Define Claude's role and expertise
- Set constraints and boundaries
- Establish output format expectations
See: references/system-prompt-patterns.md </technique>
<technique name="prefilling"> **When**: Enforcing specific output format (Claude-specific)Start Claude's response to guide format:
Assistant: {"result":
Forces JSON output without preamble. </technique>
<technique name="context_management"> **When**: Long-running tasks, multi-session work, large context usageFor Claude 4.5 with context awareness:
- Inform about automatic context compaction
- Add state tracking (JSON, progress.txt, git)
- Use test-first patterns for complex implementations
- Enable autonomous task completion across context windows
See: references/context-management.md </technique> </core_techniques>
<prompt_creation_workflow> <step_0> Gather requirements using AskUserQuestion:
-
What is the prompt's purpose?
- Generate content
- Analyze/extract information
- Transform data
- Make decisions
- Other
-
What model will use this prompt?
- Claude (use XML tags)
- GPT (use markdown structure)
- Other/multiple
-
What complexity level?
- Simple (single task, clear output)
- Medium (multiple steps, some nuance)
- Complex (reasoning, edge cases, validation)
-
Output format requirements?
- Free text
- JSON/structured data
- Code
- Specific template </step_0>
<step_1> Draft the prompt using this template:
<context>
[Background the model needs to understand the task]
</context>
<objective>
[Clear statement of what to accomplish]
</objective>
<instructions>
[Step-by-step process, numbered if sequential]
</instructions>
<constraints>
[Rules, limitations, things to avoid]
</constraints>
<output_format>
[Exact structure of expected output]
</output_format>
<examples>
[2-4 input/output pairs if format matters]
</examples>
<success_criteria>
[How to verify the task was done correctly]
</success_criteria>
</step_1>
<step_2> Apply relevant techniques based on complexity:
- Simple: Clear instructions + output format
- Medium: Add examples + constraints
- Complex: Add reasoning steps + edge cases + validation </step_2>
<step_3> Review checklist:
- Is the task clearly stated?
- Are ambiguous words removed?
- Is output format specified?
- Are edge cases addressed?
- Would a person with no context understand it? </step_3> </prompt_creation_workflow>
<anti_patterns> <pitfall name="vague_instructions"> ❌ "Help with the data" ✅ "Extract email addresses from the CSV, remove duplicates, output as JSON array" </pitfall>
<pitfall name="negative_prompting"> ❌ "Don't use technical jargon" ✅ "Write in plain language suitable for a non-technical audience" </pitfall> <pitfall name="no_examples"> ❌ Describing format in words only ✅ Showing 2-3 concrete input/output examples </pitfall> <pitfall name="missing_edge_cases"> ❌ "Process the file" ✅ "Process the file. If empty, return []. If malformed, return error with line number." </pitfall>See: references/anti-patterns.md </anti_patterns>
<reference_guides> Core principles:
- references/clarity-principles.md - Being clear and direct
- references/xml-structure.md - Using XML tags effectively
Techniques:
- references/few-shot-patterns.md - Example-based prompting
- references/reasoning-techniques.md - Chain of thought, step-by-step
- references/system-prompt-patterns.md - System prompt templates
- references/context-management.md - Context windows, long-horizon reasoning, state tracking
Best practices by vendor:
- references/anthropic-best-practices.md - Claude-specific techniques
- references/openai-best-practices.md - GPT-specific techniques
Quality:
- references/anti-patterns.md - Common mistakes to avoid
- references/prompt-templates.md - Ready-to-use templates </reference_guides>
<success_criteria> A well-crafted prompt has:
- Clear, unambiguous objective
- Specific output format with example
- Relevant context provided
- Edge cases addressed
- No vague language (try, maybe, generally)
- Appropriate technique selection for task complexity
- Success criteria defined </success_criteria>