Content pruning review
Codex-first Agent Skills library for premium frontend, website, motion, accessibility, QA, and handoff workflows.
npx -y skills add TheGoat395/Codex-Skills --skill content-pruning-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Review and prune website content. Use for removing generic copy, duplicate sections, weak feature cards, unsupported claims, placeholder content, bloated FAQs, repeated testimonials, excessive prose, stale pages, low-value sections, and AI-generated filler before final visual polish.
SKILL.md
2.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Content Pruning Review
Use this skill to make the page sharper by deleting what dilutes the main decision path.
Workflow
- Inspect the page goal, audience, offer/product reality, source copy, proof, IA, forms, SEO/social metadata, brand voice, and verification commands.
- Read Content Pruning Review Guide before changing headings, sections, CTAs, metadata, labels, or UI copy.
- Draft from evidence: real product/service facts, proof, objections, user tasks, and constraints.
- Replace generic claims with specific language or remove them.
- Inspect the rendered page on desktop and mobile for hierarchy, wrapping, repetition, and whether copy still matches the UI.
Always Protect
- Inspect before writing or coding: audience, offer, product/service reality, source copy, assets, proof, claims, conversion goal, information architecture, SEO/metadata needs, forms, legal/trust constraints, and available verification commands.
- Use copy to make the design more specific: every headline, label, CTA, section, and proof point should reduce ambiguity rather than decorate the layout.
- Avoid generic premium language, vague transformation claims, placeholder testimonials, fake metrics, empty adjectives, and hero copy that could fit any brand.
- Write in the user's domain vocabulary while keeping language clear, concise, concrete, and scannable.
- Tie claims to proof: screenshots, artifacts, reviews, credentials, specifications, case studies, pricing terms, process details, or real outcomes.
- Keep navigation, forms, pricing, FAQs, and CTAs honest and task-focused; do not create dark patterns or hide material terms.
- Respect accessibility and structure: semantic headings, meaningful link/button text, labeled forms, useful error/help text, readable line lengths, and no critical copy trapped in images.
- Before delivery, inspect rendered desktop and mobile copy for hierarchy, wrapping, overflow, repetition, and whether the words still match the implemented page.