Doc structure
Docs-health structure scan — broken internal links/anchors (GitHub-slug resolution, Thai/CJK safe), dead relative file links, heading hierarchy (skipped levels, multiple H1), duplicate sibling headings (same parent, same text), GFM table shape (silently-dropped cells), orphan/undefined reference definitions, bare URLs in prose, images missing alt text (WCAG-aware, SUSPECTED-only — decorative-vs-content intent is a human call). Triggers on: "/doc-structure", "doc-structure", "broken links", "check docs structure", "doc health". Mechanical + deterministic: detection runs through the shipped CommonMark+GFM AST engine (never regex over raw markdown), so things that render fine are not flagged. Reports; fixes on request via choice-gated menu. Severity is judged by context, never mechanical.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add TheColliery/CoalLedger --skill doc-structureAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
5.8 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Doc-Structure
Answer in the USER'S language; keep technical terms, commands, paths, and check ids verbatim.
Scan markdown docs for structural breakage. Report CONFIRMED findings. Fix on request.
Parameters
- SCOPE: named files (default when given) | touched doc files this session | whole repo
**/*.md(confirm first if > 50 files).
Method (the code detects, you judge)
- Run the engine — it ships INSIDE this skill folder at
./lib/, so the skill works even when it travels alone. Your context carries this skill's base directory — substitute it for<skill base dir>and run exactly:cd "<skill base dir>" && node ./lib/md-checks.mjs --json <absolute-file.md> [more absolute paths ...]Thecdis REQUIRED —./lib/resolves against the skill folder, never your project cwd (without it:Cannot find module). Target docs must be ABSOLUTE paths, since cwd is now the skill folder. Findings do not depend on cwd: each doc's relative links resolve against that DOC's own directory. Never re-derive these checks by reading markdown yourself — the AST engine exists so detection matches CommonMark+GFM rendering (regex cry-wolfs on things that render fine). Honest ceiling: CommonMark+GFM fidelity, NOT 100% GitHub-pixel fidelity. - Contextualize severity — detection is deterministic; severity is NEVER mechanical. Judge each finding by context, then honor
.coalledger.jsonseverityFloor:- CRITICAL: the breakage misleads harmfully (a dead link in a security/install step a user must follow).
- HIGH: a real breakage on a doc readers actively use (broken anchor in a live README, dropped table cells with content).
- MEDIUM: structural debt (skipped heading level, multiple H1, undefined ref in secondary docs).
- LOW: style/hygiene (bare URL, orphan definition, anything in an archived/internal doc).
- Report — CONFIRMED table only; anything the engine could not verify (e.g. site-root-relative
/links, a known engine limit) OR whose correctness the engine cannot itself judge (image-alt-missing— decorative-vs-content intent) goes to a separate SUSPECTED list, never the main table.image-alt-missingcarriesfinding.suspected = trueand is SUSPECTED-only ALWAYS — there is no config toggle for it (skip-what-doesn't-matter, fill-what-does, never on/off).
Checks (engine ids)
| id | catches |
|---|---|
| heading-skip | level jumps (h1 -> h3) |
| heading-multiple-h1 | more than one top-level title |
| heading-duplicate | same-parent sibling headings with identical text — a plain #slug link reaches only the first heading in the document to claim that slug, which may be neither duplicate (slug claims are text-independent and document-wide; an earlier, differently-worded heading can claim it first — the check itself is sibling-scoped); keep-a-changelog per-release ### Added repeats under different ## version parents are deliberately not flagged |
| anchor-missing | #fragment resolves to no heading slug / HTML id (same-file + cross-file, case-mismatch hinted) |
| file-missing | dead relative link/image/definition target |
| table-ragged | row with MORE cells than the header (GitHub silently drops them) |
| ref-undefined | [text][label] with no definition (renders as literal brackets) |
| def-orphan | definition never referenced |
| bare-url | raw URL in prose (MD034 class) |
| image-alt-missing | image/image-reference with empty or whitespace-only alt (all reference forms). SUSPECTED-only always — empty alt is WCAG-1.1.1-correct for a purely decorative image, so intent is a human call, never CONFIRMED |
| doc-too-large | input over the size cap — refused before parsing, never a false clean bill on a doc too big to scan safely |
| doc-unreadable | binary/corrupted input (NUL byte sniffed) — refused before parsing, never a false "0 findings" clean bill |
Output
| # | path:line | check | severity | finding | fix |
Then: SUSPECTED list · counts + top 3 to fix.
Fix mode (choice-gated)
After any report in an interactive session you MUST present this menu via your question tool (skip only when findings are zero or no user is present). NEVER auto-fix a live doc.
- Apply safe fixes: mechanical, fully reversible edits only (correct an anchor slug to the real heading, fix a relative path to the file's actual location, remove an orphan definition). Each fix: checkpoint (git stash/commit in a git repo; else copy the file aside — never assume git exists) -> apply -> re-run the engine on the file -> revert if new findings appeared.
- Let me pick: list findings; the user selects.
- Report only: exit unchanged.
NEVER auto-fix: anything needing a content decision (which heading an anchor SHOULD point to when several are close, whether a dead link's target should be created or the link removed, table cell content) — offer options instead.
Problem report
If this canary misbehaves, OFFER to file it at https://github.com/TheColliery/CoalLedger/issues with a user-reviewed summary — never auto-submit.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.