Sales playbook
Skill The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills/skills/sales-playbook
Write sales playbooks with qualification frameworks, discovery question banks, objection handling scripts, competitive positioning, and deal stage definitions that align the sales team on methodology.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills --skill sales-playbookAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
7.5 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Sales Playbook
Before you start
Gather the following from the user. If anything is missing, ask before proceeding:
- What are you selling? (Product, service, platform — include pricing model and deal size)
- Who is the buyer? (Target persona, title, company size, industry)
- What is the sales motion? (Inbound-led, outbound, product-led growth, channel, enterprise)
- What is the current sales cycle? (Average length, typical stages, conversion rates)
- Who are the main competitors? (Direct competitors the team encounters in deals)
- What are the top objections? (Price, timing, competition, internal build, status quo)
If the user says "we just need objection handling," clarify: objection handling without qualification criteria means reps spend time overcoming objections on deals that should never have entered the pipeline.
Playbook template
1. Ideal Customer Profile
Firmographic Fit:
- Company size: [Employee range and/or revenue range]
- Industry: [Target verticals]
- Tech stack: [Required tools or platforms in use]
Behavioral Signals:
- [Currently using competitor X or manual process Y]
- [Recently hired for role Z / posted job for...]
- [Visited pricing page, requested demo]
Disqualification Criteria:
- [Below minimum deal size]
- [No budget authority within 90 days]
- [Locked into multi-year competitor contract]
2. Deal Stage Definitions
| Stage | Entry Criteria | Rep Actions | Exit Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prospecting | Matches ICP | Research, personalize outreach | Meeting booked with decision maker |
| Discovery | Meeting confirmed | Run discovery, identify pain | Pain, timeline, budget known |
| Qualification | Pain confirmed | Complete MEDDIC | Champion identified, process mapped |
| Solution Design | Qualified opportunity | Demo, technical validation | Technical win confirmed |
| Proposal | Technical win | Present pricing, negotiate | Verbal agreement |
| Closed Won | Signed contract | Handoff to CS | Revenue recognized |
| Closed Lost | Deal lost at any stage | Document loss reason | Loss reason in CRM |
Deals cannot skip stages. If a rep cannot articulate the exit criteria for the current stage, the deal is not at that stage.
3. Qualification Framework
| Element (MEDDIC) | Question to Answer | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics | What business outcomes does the buyer measure? | "Reduce onboarding by 50%" |
| Economic Buyer | Who signs the check? | Title and name confirmed |
| Decision Criteria | What will they evaluate on? | Security, UX, price |
| Decision Process | What steps to purchase? | Eval, security, legal |
| Identify Pain | What is the cost of not solving this? | "$200K/yr in manual work" |
| Champion | Who is selling internally on our behalf? | Can articulate why you win |
A deal without a champion is a deal without an internal advocate.
4. Discovery Question Bank
Reps should use 8-12 questions per call, not all of them.
Pain: "Walk me through what happens today when [problem scenario]." / "How much time does your team spend on this per month?" / "What happens if you do not solve this in the next 6 months?"
Decision Process: "Who else needs to be involved?" / "What does your purchasing process look like for tools at this price point?" / "Is there an event driving this decision?"
Budget: "Is there budget allocated, or would this need approval?" / "Where does this rank against other priorities this quarter?"
Competition: "Are you evaluating other solutions?" / "Have you considered building this internally?"
5. Objection Handling
Use Acknowledge, Reframe, Respond for each objection:
"Your price is too high." Acknowledge pricing matters. Reframe to cost of the problem: "You mentioned [X hours/week] on [process] at [$Y/hour] — that is [$Z/year]." Cite a customer who saw ROI in [N months].
"We can build this ourselves." Acknowledge the team's capability. Reframe to opportunity cost: "Building typically takes [X months] at [$Y fully loaded], plus ongoing maintenance." Cite a customer who switched from internal build.
"We are happy with [Competitor]." Acknowledge the competitor. Reframe to the specific gap: "Teams that switch typically cite [differentiator]." Offer a reference customer who made the same switch.
"Not a priority right now." Acknowledge timing. Ask what would change priority. Quantify cost of waiting. Set a specific reconnect date tied to their trigger event.
6. Competitive Positioning
| Dimension | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | [Segment/use case] | [Segment/use case] | [Segment/use case] |
| Pricing | [Model and range] | [Model and range] | [Model and range] |
| Key strength | [Differentiator] | [Their strength] | [Their strength] |
| Key weakness | [Honest limitation] | [Their gap] | [Their gap] |
| Landmine Q | — | [Question exposing gap] | [Question exposing gap] |
Landmine questions surface a competitor's weakness without trash-talking.
Quality checklist
- ICP includes firmographic fit, behavioral signals, and disqualification criteria
- Deal stages have entry criteria, required actions, and exit criteria
- Qualification framework uses a named methodology with evidence requirements
- Discovery questions cover pain, process, budget, and competition (15+ total)
- Objection handling follows Acknowledge-Reframe-Respond with real evidence
- Competitive positioning is honest about your own limitations
- A new rep on day 30 could execute from this playbook
Common mistakes
- Writing a playbook nobody reads. A 50-page document is a shelf decoration. Keep it actionable and referenceable during live calls.
- Generic objection handling. "Our product is better" is not a response. Every response needs specific evidence.
- Skipping disqualification. A playbook that only says who to sell to wastes pipeline time on unwinnable deals.
- Stages without exit criteria. "Demo completed" is an activity, not a stage. Stages need verifiable conditions.
- Trash-talking competitors. Disparaging competitors damages credibility. Use landmine questions instead.
- Static playbooks. Competitive positioning shifts quarterly. Build a review cadence.
What ships with it: 4 files
30.0 KB alongside SKILL.md
assets/
examples/
- enterprise-saas.md4.8 KB
references/
- competitive-positioning-guide.md7.9 KB
- meddic-framework.md10.6 KB