agentsclimarketplace

Glb web handoff

Skill ThanhNguyxnOrg/blendops/skills/glb-web-handoff

AI-native Blender workflow and skill pack for non-Blender users, built around official Blender MCP, Claude Blender Connector, and Blender CLI.

Install
npx -y skills add ThanhNguyxnOrg/blendops --skill glb-web-handoff

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Prepare truthful GLB/web handoff output with explicit artifact status, assumptions, and caveats.

SKILL.md

5.0 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

glb-web-handoff

Purpose

Define reliable handoff language and checks for GLB/web scenarios without overclaiming.

Quick start

  • confirm this skill fits your goal
  • provide required inputs first
  • keep runtime claims evidence-bound
  • follow suggested next-skill handoff

When to use

  • before web handoff summary
  • when user asks GLB readiness
  • when preparing Three.js/R3F expectations

When not to use

  • to claim GLB was produced without evidence
  • to replace runtime export verification

Trigger phrases

  • "prepare web handoff"
  • "is GLB ready"
  • "summarize export status"

Prerequisites / readiness

  • quality checker output available
  • artifact evidence state known
  • runtime mode known

Input schema

Required inputs

  • artifact status evidence
  • handoff target context
  • known compatibility assumptions

Optional inputs

  • size/performance constraints
  • expected downstream stack details

Assumptions to confirm

  • transform/scale/origin assumptions
  • texture/material portability assumptions
  • loader/extension assumptions

Output schema

Primary output

  • handoff status report

Secondary output

  • compatibility assumptions and caveats

Evidence / caveat output

  • explicit artifact status per artifact
  • unresolved risk notes and next checks

Required laws

  • ../../laws/evidence-before-done.md
  • ../../laws/official-runtime-only.md
  • ../../laws/non-blender-user-language.md
  • ../../laws/no-arbitrary-python-interface.md

Official runtime boundary

No GLB/export success claim without concrete evidence.

Operating procedure

  1. Enumerate expected handoff artifacts (GLB/preview/report).
  2. Mark each artifact status (Produced/Not Produced/Not Run).
  3. Validate transform/scale/origin assumptions are documented.
  4. Validate material/texture caveats are documented.
  5. Record Three.js/R3F compatibility assumptions.
  6. Record performance caveats and uncertainty.
  7. Check evidence boundary compliance.
  8. Produce handoff summary and next actions.

Decision tree

  • If GLB evidence exists → report produced + caveats.
  • If no GLB evidence and runtime not run → Not Run status.
  • If runtime run but export failed → Not Produced + failure note.

Playbooks

  • Playbook A: text-only planning path
  • Playbook B: runtime-ready path with evidence gating
  • Playbook C: blocked runtime path with caveat-first reporting

Mode handling

Text-only mode

  • handoff expectations only
  • artifacts marked Not Run/Not Produced

Runtime-ready mode

  • include evidence-linked artifact statuses

Blocked runtime mode

  • no production claims
  • blocker-driven next steps

Validation checklist

  • GLB status explicit
  • preview status explicit
  • transform/scale/origin assumptions documented
  • material/texture caveats documented
  • stack assumptions documented
  • performance caveats documented
  • evidence boundary respected
  • next checks actionable
  • no unsupported readiness claims
  • plain-language handoff summary

Pass / Warn / Fail rubric

CategoryPassWarnFail
Artifact truthStatus matches evidencePartial evidenceClaims without evidence
Compatibility clarityAssumptions/caveats completeSome gapsMissing assumptions
Web handoff usabilityClear next actionsPartial actionabilityConfusing or incomplete
Evidence boundaryNo overclaimsMinor ambiguityContradictory claims

Failure handling

  • Missing evidence: mark Not Run/Not Produced and list missing checks.
  • Failed export evidence: record failure reason and retry path.
  • Unknown compatibility: keep Warn with explicit caveat.

Troubleshooting

  • Existing files found: verify provenance before claiming produced.
  • Missing scale/origin assumptions: add as blocker.
  • Missing stack assumptions: mark handoff as conditional.

Best practices

  • always pair artifact status with caveat
  • separate assumptions from verified facts
  • prioritize non-technical clarity in final handoff text

Good examples

“GLB status: Not Run (runtime not executed in this pass). Next: run official runtime eval and capture export evidence.”

Bad examples

“GLB is ready for production.” (no artifact proof)

User-facing response template

  • What is included now
  • What is still unverified
  • What to run/check next

Anti-patterns

  • skipping required laws or runtime boundary statements
  • claiming runtime/artifact success without evidence
  • using non-official runtime setup paths
  • producing jargon-heavy final output without explanation

Cross-skill handoff

  • Next: non-blender-user-response-writer

Non-goals

  • runtime export code generation
  • unsupported compatibility guarantees

References

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.