Techtide azure rbac review
Skill TechTideOhio/techtide-harness-kit/skills/azure/techtide-azure-rbac-review
Trust contracts for AI agent skills: JSON Schema risk tiers, tool permissions, deny-by-default egress, approval gates, prompt-injection fixtures, ~28 CI validation gates. Apache-2.0.
npx -y skills add TechTideOhio/techtide-harness-kit --skill techtide-azure-rbac-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use this skill for Azure RBAC, Entra-backed access, role assignment, custom role, scope, subscription, management group, or least-privilege review tasks. Trigger when the user asks whether Azure access is too broad or how to grant access safely.
SKILL.md
1.7 KB, 257 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Azure RBAC Review
Purpose
Review Azure access decisions against least privilege, scope minimization, and operational safety.
Lean operating rules
- Prefer live Azure or Microsoft evidence first when the active client exposes it; otherwise fall back to official documentation and sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
References
Load these only when needed:
- MCP and evidence path - use when choosing live Azure evidence, confirming Microsoft MCP capability, or switching to documentation mode.
- Workflow and output contract - use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- Official sources - use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.
Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.