Geo technical
AI-visibility engineering, the open way — a Claude Code GEO/AI-search audit suite, two original tools (agent-readiness-scan + audit-report-kit), and the THL method that ties them together.
npx -y skills add techhorizonlabs/thl-open --skill geo-technicalAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 13 stars13 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Technical SEO audit with GEO-specific checks — crawlability, indexability, security, performance, SSR, and AI crawler access
SKILL.md
3.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
GEO Technical SEO Audit
Purpose
Technical SEO is the foundation of both traditional search visibility and AI search citation. A technically broken site cannot be crawled, indexed, or cited by any platform. This skill audits eight categories of technical health with specific attention to GEO requirements — most critically server-side rendering (AI crawlers do not execute JavaScript) and AI crawler access (many sites inadvertently block AI crawlers in robots.txt).
How to Use This Skill
- Collect the target URL (homepage + 2-3 key inner pages).
- Fetch each page using curl/WebFetch to get raw HTML and HTTP headers.
- Work through each of the eight categories in
references/audit-categories.md, scoring each against its rubric there. (That file also covers the IndexNow check.) - Total the category scores into the 100-point composite below.
- Generate
GEO-TECHNICAL-AUDIT.mdusingreferences/output-template.md.
The two GEO-critical categories — AI crawler access (Category 1.2) and server-side
rendering (Category 7) — are where conventional SEO audits miss the most. A site can pass a
traditional audit and still be invisible to AI crawlers because its content is client-rendered or
GPTBot is disallowed. Always confirm these two by fetching raw HTML with curl (no JS execution).
Overall Scoring
| Category | Max Points | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Crawlability | 15 | Core foundation |
| Indexability | 12 | Core foundation |
| Security | 10 | Trust signal |
| URL Structure | 8 | Crawl efficiency |
| Mobile Optimization | 10 | Google requirement |
| Core Web Vitals | 15 | Ranking signal |
| Server-Side Rendering | 15 | GEO critical |
| Page Speed & Server | 15 | Performance |
| Total | 100 |
Per-category point breakdowns live alongside each category's checks in
references/audit-categories.md.
Score Interpretation
- 90-100: Excellent — technically sound for both traditional SEO and GEO
- 70-89: Good — minor issues to address but fundamentally solid
- 50-69: Needs Work — significant technical debt impacting visibility
- 30-49: Poor — major issues blocking crawling, indexing, or AI visibility
- 0-29: Critical — fundamental technical failures requiring immediate attention
Output
Provenance (THL): tag the score
[scan](data fetched this run),[partial-scan],[heuristic](judgement, no data), or[unmeasured]— and emit—instead of a number when[unmeasured]or pure[heuristic]. A number with weak provenance still reads as hard data. See the GEO Method.
Write GEO-TECHNICAL-AUDIT.md using
references/output-template.md: technical score, per-category
breakdown with Pass/Warn/Fail status, the AI-crawler access table, then issues tiered as Critical
/ Warnings / Recommendations, each citing the specific page URL so the finding is verifiable.