Sql code review
Skill tbc-servicos/dataagile-agent-kit/protheus/skills/sql-code-review
Plugin Claude Code para Protheus e ADVPL/TLPP — base 155k+ registros, Agent Teams, compilação TDS-CLI, testes TIR e MCP PO-UI
npx -y skills add tbc-servicos/dataagile-agent-kit --skill sql-code-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Universal SQL code review assistant that performs comprehensive security, maintainability, and code quality analysis across SQL databases (PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle). Focuses on SQL injection prevention, access control, code standards, and anti-pattern detection. Complements SQL optimization prompt for complete development coverage. Use when user says "review SQL", "SQL security audit", "SQL anti-patterns", "check SQL quality".
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
13.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
SQL Code Review
Perform a thorough SQL code review of ${selection} (or entire project if no selection) focusing on security, performance, maintainability, and database best practices.
Review Categories
🔒 Security
- SQL Injection Prevention — all user inputs must be parameterized; no string concatenation in queries
- Access Control — principle of least privilege, role-based permissions, schema security
- Data Protection — avoid
SELECT *on sensitive tables, enforce audit logging and data masking
⚡ Performance
- Query Structure — eliminate
SELECT DISTINCT *, prefer explicit JOINs over comma-separated FROM - Index Strategy — verify indexes for WHERE/JOIN columns, flag over-indexing and unused indexes
- Join Optimization — correct join types, optimal join order, no accidental Cartesian products
- Aggregation — replace correlated subqueries with JOIN/GROUP BY when possible
🛠️ Code Quality
- Formatting — consistent uppercase keywords, aligned columns, proper indentation
- Naming — descriptive table/column names, no reserved words as identifiers, consistent casing
- Schema Design — appropriate normalization, optimal data types, proper constraints and defaults
🗄️ Database Compatibility
- ANSI SQL first — use COALESCE, CASE WHEN, ANSI JOINs, FETCH FIRST for portability
- Database-specific idioms — leverage engine-specific features (JSONB, COLUMNSTORE, sequences) where appropriate
Protheus note: Use
ChangeQuery()to automatically translate SQL syntax to the active database dialect. BeginSQL/EndSQL callsChangeQuery()automatically.
Bundled Reference Files
This skill uses progressive disclosure. The SKILL.md body covers the review workflow, category definitions, checklist, and output format. Detailed code examples, anti-patterns, and database-specific best practices are in the references/ directory — read them on demand based on the scenario:
| Reference File | When to Read | Content |
|---|---|---|
| references/sql-security-patterns.md | Reviewing security concerns — SQL injection, access control, data protection, or dynamic SQL | Injection examples, parameterization patterns, access control checklist, data masking examples |
| references/sql-performance-and-quality-patterns.md | Reviewing query performance, code style, anti-patterns, or testing strategies | Query optimization examples, JOIN/aggregation patterns, N+1 and DISTINCT anti-patterns, formatting standards, data integrity checks |
| references/database-specific-best-practices.md | Reviewing SQL targeting a specific database (PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle) or cross-database portability | ANSI SQL cross-database patterns, PostgreSQL (JSONB, GIN), SQL Server (NVARCHAR, COLUMNSTORE), Oracle (sequences, VARCHAR2) |
Also refer to references/sonarqube-rules-reference.md for the complete SonarQube rules reference shared across skills.
Review Workflow
Step 1: Identify Scope and Database
Determine from the user's request:
- Which SQL files or queries to review
- Target database engine (PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle, or multi-database)
- Review focus (security, performance, quality, or full review)
Step 2: Load Relevant References
Based on the review focus and database, read the appropriate reference files:
- Security focus → read references/sql-security-patterns.md
- Performance / quality focus → read references/sql-performance-and-quality-patterns.md
- Database-specific review → read references/database-specific-best-practices.md
- Full review → read all three reference files
Step 3: Analyze Code Against Checklist
Walk through each category in the checklist below. For each finding, classify priority as CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, or LOW.
Step 4: Generate Report
Use the Issue Template (below) for each finding. Group findings by category and sort by priority.
SQL Review Checklist
Security
- All user inputs are parameterized
- No dynamic SQL construction with string concatenation
- Appropriate access controls and permissions
- Sensitive data is properly protected
- SQL injection attack vectors are eliminated
Performance
- Indexes exist for frequently queried columns
- No unnecessary SELECT * statements
- JOINs are optimized and use appropriate types
- WHERE clauses are selective and use indexes
- Subqueries are optimized or converted to JOINs
Code Quality
- Consistent naming conventions
- Proper formatting and indentation
- Meaningful comments for complex logic
- Appropriate data types are used
- Error handling is implemented
Schema Design
- Tables are properly normalized
- Constraints enforce data integrity
- Indexes support query patterns
- Foreign key relationships are defined
- Default values are appropriate
Review Output Format
Issue Template
## [PRIORITY] [CATEGORY]: [Brief Description]
**Location**: [Table/View/Procedure name and line number if applicable]
**Issue**: [Detailed explanation of the problem]
**Security Risk**: [If applicable - injection risk, data exposure, etc.]
**Performance Impact**: [Query cost, execution time impact]
**Recommendation**: [Specific fix with code example]
**Before**:
```sql
-- Problematic SQL
After:
-- Improved SQL
Expected Improvement: [Performance gain, security benefit]
### Summary Assessment
- **Security Score**: [1-10] - SQL injection protection, access controls
- **Performance Score**: [1-10] - Query efficiency, index usage
- **Maintainability Score**: [1-10] - Code quality, documentation
- **Schema Quality Score**: [1-10] - Design patterns, normalization
### Top 3 Priority Actions
1. **[Critical Security Fix]**: Address SQL injection vulnerabilities
2. **[Performance Optimization]**: Add missing indexes or optimize queries
3. **[Code Quality]**: Improve naming conventions and documentation
Focus on providing actionable, database-agnostic recommendations while highlighting platform-specific optimizations and best practices.
> **Cross-Database Review Tip:** When reviewing Protheus SQL, verify the query is compatible with all three supported databases (PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Oracle). Use `ChangeQuery()` for automatic SQL dialect translation, or `TCGetDB()` for runtime DB detection when DB-specific logic is unavoidable.
---
## Protheus SQL Patterns
When reviewing SQL in the TOTVS Protheus ecosystem — whether embedded SQL (preferring `FWExecStatement`, with legacy `TCQuery` / `TCSqlExec` calls), Workarea-based access, or standalone queries — apply the following additional checks.
### Table and Field Naming Conventions
Protheus uses standardized short-name tables and fields managed through the data dictionary:
| Alias | Module | Description |
|-------|--------|-------------|
| SA1 | All | Customers |
| SA2 | All | Suppliers |
| SB1 | SIGAEST | Products |
| SC5 | SIGAFAT | Sales Orders (header) |
| SC6 | SIGAFAT | Sales Orders (items) |
| SD1 | SIGACOM | Purchase document items |
| SD2 | SIGAFAT | Sales document items |
| SE1 | SIGAFIN | Accounts Receivable |
| SE2 | SIGAFIN | Accounts Payable |
| SF1 | SIGACOM | Incoming invoices (header) |
| SF2 | SIGAFAT | Outgoing invoices (header) |
| SX2 | System | Table dictionary |
| SX3 | System | Field dictionary |
| SIX | System | Index dictionary |
Fields follow the pattern `<prefix>_<name>`, e.g., `A1_COD` (customer code), `A1_NOME` (customer name), `D1_DOC` (document number).
### Mandatory Filters for Protheus Tables
Every query against a Protheus table **must** include these filters unless there is an explicit reason to omit them:
```sql
-- BAD: Missing mandatory filters — returns deleted records and all branches
SELECT A1_COD, A1_NOME FROM SA1010
-- GOOD: Proper Protheus query with mandatory filters
SELECT A1_COD, A1_NOME
FROM SA1010
WHERE D_E_L_E_T_ = ' '
AND A1_FILIAL = '01'
| Filter | Purpose |
|---|---|
D_E_L_E_T_ = ' ' | Excludes logically deleted records (soft delete). Always required. |
<prefix>_FILIAL = cFilAnt | Multi-branch filter (tenant isolation). Required unless deliberately querying across branches. |
Workarea vs. Embedded SQL Decision Matrix
| Scenario | Recommended Approach |
|---|---|
| Single-record lookup by index key | Workarea (DbSelectArea / DbSetOrder / DbSeek) |
| Sequential processing of a filtered set | Workarea with While loop |
| Complex joins across multiple tables | Embedded SQL via FWExecStatement |
| Aggregate queries (SUM, COUNT, AVG) | Embedded SQL via FWExecStatement (use :ExecScalar() for single values) |
| Bulk INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE operations | FWExecStatement + TCSqlExec(oStatement:GetFixQuery()) |
| Reports with heavy filtering | Embedded SQL via FWExecStatement, or temporary tables via TCSqlExec |
Workarea Access Review Checklist
// GOOD: Complete workarea access pattern
DbSelectArea("SA1")
DbSetOrder(1) // Set the index defined in SIX
If DbSeek(FWxFilial("SA1") + cCodCli)
// process record...
EndIf
-
DbSelectArea()called before any workarea operation -
DbSetOrder()set to the correct SIX index -
DbSeek()includes branch prefix viaFWxFilial() - Write operations wrapped with
RecLock()/MsUnlock() -
Whileloops include!Eof()andSA1->(DbSkip())pattern
Embedded SQL Review Checklist
// GOOD: Parameterized embedded SQL via FWExecStatement (DB-side bind, cacheable)
Local cQuery as Character
Local oExec as Object
Local cAlias as Character
cQuery := "SELECT A1_COD, A1_NOME "
cQuery += "FROM " + RetSqlName("SA1") + " SA1 "
cQuery += "WHERE D_E_L_E_T_ = ? "
cQuery += "AND A1_FILIAL = ? "
cQuery += "AND A1_COD = ? "
oExec := FWExecStatement():New(ChangeQuery(cQuery))
oExec:SetString(1, ' ')
oExec:SetString(2, FWxFilial("SA1"))
oExec:SetString(3, cCodCli)
cAlias := oExec:OpenAlias("QRY_CLI")
// ... consume (cAlias)->A1_COD / A1_NOME ...
(cAlias)->(DbCloseArea())
oExec:Destroy()
- Uses
RetSqlName()to get the physical table name (handles company suffix) - Includes
D_E_L_E_T_ = ' 'filter - Includes branch filter via
FWxFilial() - Temporary alias is closed after use (
QRY_CLI->(DbCloseArea())) - String values are sanitized to prevent SQL injection (use
FWExecStatement— no raw user input concatenated)
Common Protheus SQL Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
Missing D_E_L_E_T_ filter | Returns deleted records | Always add D_E_L_E_T_ = ' ' |
SELECT * on Protheus tables | Protheus tables have many system fields; wastes bandwidth | Select only needed columns |
| Full table scan on SD1/SD2/SE1/SE2 | These transactional tables can have millions of rows | Use indexed columns in WHERE clause |
Missing %nolock% on SQL Server | Causes lock escalation on read queries | Add %nolock% hint: FROM SA1010 WITH (%nolock%) — the %nolock% DBAccess macro translates to WITH (NOLOCK) on MSSQL and is silently ignored on PostgreSQL/Oracle (MVCC) |
| Concatenating user input into SQL | SQL injection vulnerability | Use FWExecStatement or TcGenQry2 to parameterize queries |
| Not closing temporary aliases | Resource leak, workarea pollution | Always QRY->(DbCloseArea()) after use |
Hardcoding table suffix (e.g., SA1010) | Breaks in multi-company environments | Use RetSqlName("SA1") |
| Creating procedures directly in source | Prohibited — violates SonarQube rules | Use SPManager for procedure management |
| Direct queries without evaluation (Cloud) | Queries may not be Cloud-compatible | Evaluate Cloud impact; prefer framework APIs where available |
| Using SE5 table directly | SE5 is deprecated | Use FKx family functions + ExecAuto |
| Using IIF in SQL or AdvPL expressions | Prohibited for clean code | Replace with CASE WHEN (SQL) or If/Else/EndIf (AdvPL) |
SIX Index Dictionary Awareness
Protheus indexes are defined in the SIX dictionary. When writing queries or using workareas:
- Check available indexes before choosing
DbSetOrder()— using the wrong order leads to full scans - Index 1 is typically: branch + primary key (e.g.,
A1_FILIAL + A1_COD + A1_LOJA) - Composite indexes should be leveraged in
WHEREclauses matching left-to-right column order - Never create ad-hoc indexes in production without SIX registration
Protheus SQL Security
- Never concatenate raw user input into SQL strings — use
FWExecStatementorTcGenQry2for parameterized queries - Never expose table structure in error messages returned to the client
- Validate input length against SX3 field size before inserting/updating
- Use
FWExecViewfor user-facing queries when possible (respects field-level security)
Refer to references/sonarqube-rules-reference.md for the complete SonarQube rules reference.