Synthesizing pillars
Skill synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/plugins/context-ledger/skills/synthesizing-pillars
The Synapti Marketplace is a curated collection of Claude Code plugins designed for AI-augmented development + advanced analytical and research tasks. Each plugin provides specialized agents, skills, and commands that extend Claude Code's capabilities in specific domains.
npx -y skills add synaptiai/synapti-marketplace --skill synthesizing-pillarsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when evidence collection is complete for a pillar and need to extract actionable insights. Transforms raw evidence into structured synthesis with patterns and contradictions identified.
SKILL.md
5.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Pillar Synthesis
This skill transforms raw evidence objects into structured insights for a single research pillar.
Prerequisites
- Evidence gate passed (≥5 evidence objects for this pillar)
- Evidence objects in
02-evidence/<pillar>/
Workflow
Use TodoWrite to track these mandatory steps:
<required> 1. Load all evidence objects for the pillar 2. Identify patterns and themes 3. Resolve or document contradictions 4. Extract key insights 5. Generate synthesis document 6. Link insights to evidence IDs </required>Step 1: Load Evidence
Read all EV-<pillar>-*.yaml files from 02-evidence/<pillar>/.
For each evidence object, extract:
- Claim
- Confidence
- Assumptions
- Tags
Build a working set of all claims.
Step 2: Identify Patterns
Group evidence by theme:
- What claims cluster together?
- What topics have multiple evidence points?
- What themes emerge across sources?
Pattern identification:
Theme: Pricing
├── EV-market-pricing-smb-wtp (0.75) - SMB WTP $29
├── EV-market-pricing-enterprise-wtp (0.80) - Enterprise WTP $99
└── EV-competitors-pricing-benchmark (0.70) - Market avg $45
Insight: Pricing flexibility needed for multi-segment
Step 3: Handle Contradictions
For contradictory evidence:
- Note the contradiction explicitly
- Assess confidence delta - Higher confidence wins if large gap
- Check recency - More recent may supersede older
- Check authority - More authoritative source wins
- If unresolved - Document both, flag for decision-making
### Contradiction: User Segment Priority
**EV-users-segment-power-users** (0.70): Power users drive retention
**EV-users-segment-casual** (0.65): Casual users drive growth
**Resolution:** Unresolved. Both valid for different goals.
**Recommendation:** Requires explicit decision (DEC-*)
Step 4: Extract Key Insights
For each theme, formulate 1-3 key insights:
Insight structure:
- Observation: What the evidence shows
- Implication: What this means for the product
- Confidence: How confident we are (based on evidence)
- Evidence: Which EV-* IDs support this
Step 5: Generate Synthesis Document
Write 03-synthesis/SYN-<pillar>.md using template from references/synthesis-template.md.
Required sections:
- Executive Summary (3-5 bullet points)
- Key Insights (with evidence citations)
- Contradictions and Resolutions
- Gaps and Uncertainties
- Recommended Decisions (what needs explicit DEC-*)
Step 6: Link to Evidence
Every insight must cite evidence:
## Key Insight: Price Ceiling
SMB segment shows consistent willingness-to-pay ceiling around $30/month.
(EV-market-pricing-smb-wtp, EV-competitors-pricing-benchmark)
This suggests pricing above $30 requires additional value justification
or enterprise-focused features.
User Interaction
Use the AskUserQuestion tool when:
Contradiction resolution needed
Question: "Evidence conflicts on [topic]. How should I resolve?"
Options:
- "Favor higher confidence source"
- "Favor more recent source"
- "Document both, defer to decision phase"
- "Help me assess the sources"
Insight interpretation unclear
Question: "Evidence suggests [X]. Is this interpretation correct?"
Options:
- "Yes, that interpretation is correct"
- "No, the implication is different"
- "Need more context to interpret"
Gap identification
Question: "Synthesis reveals gap in [area]. How to handle?"
Options:
- "Note gap, proceed with available evidence"
- "Request additional research"
- "Critical gap - block until resolved"
Output
After synthesis:
## Synthesis Complete: [pillar]
**Evidence Analyzed:** [N] objects
**Key Insights:** [M]
**Contradictions:** [X] ([Y] resolved, [Z] pending)
### Top Insights
1. [Insight with evidence citation]
2. [Insight with evidence citation]
3. [Insight with evidence citation]
### Decisions Needed
- [Topic requiring DEC-*]
- [Another decision point]
### Document Location
`03-synthesis/SYN-<pillar>.md`
References
- references/synthesis-template.md - Document template