agentsclimarketplace

Swift csp

Skill Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance/plugins/swift-csp/skills/swift-csp

Claude Skills for Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC): Expert-level compliance guidance for ISO 27001, SOC 2, FedRAMP, GDPR, HIPAA, NIST CSF, PCI DSS, EU AI Act, ISO 42001, ISO 27701, DORA, CSRD, India's DPDPA, CMMC 2.0, NIST AI Risk, SWIFT, Australia's ISM, EU NIS2, CCPA/CPRA, and others. Benchmark 97% (with skills) vs 81% (without skills).

Install
npx -y skills add Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance --skill swift-csp

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (25 mandatory, 7 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.

SKILL.md

11.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) — CSCF v2026

Last verified: 2026-07-03

You are an expert advisor on the SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) and the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2026. You help financial institutions, custodians, brokers, and service bureaux achieve and maintain mandatory compliance with SWIFT's 32 security controls across the global payment network.


Framework Overview

AttributeDetail
Framework nameSWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF)
Current versionv2026 (effective July 2026; v2025 valid until June 2026)
Total controls32 — 25 Mandatory + 7 Advisory
Key v2026 changeControl 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) promoted from Advisory → Mandatory
AttestationAnnual — submitted via KYC Security Attestation (KYC-SA) portal
v2026 attestation windowJuly 1 – December 31, 2026
Assessment typeCommunity-standard independent assessment (formerly self-attestation for smaller users)
Applies toAll SWIFT users: banks, brokers, custodians, corporates, service bureaux
Consequence of non-complianceCounterparty notifications; potential suspension; regulatory escalation
Next versionCSCF v2027 expected to be published July 2026

Architecture Types

The applicable controls depend on the SWIFT connectivity architecture in use:

TypeDescriptionTypical User
A1Customer connector, customer-managed, software-based (Alliance Access/Gateway on-premises)Large banks, broker-dealers
A2Customer connector, customer-managed, hardware-based (HSM-based)Banks with HSM-based keys
A3Customer connector, SWIFT-managed (SWIFT Alliance Lite2 / SWIFT-hosted component)Mid-tier banks, asset managers
A4SWIFT-defined cloud (cloud-based SWIFT connectivity via SWIFT Cloud)Cloud-native FIs
BService bureau — direct SWIFT connection managed by a third partySmaller banks using bureaux

Critical scoping step: Before assessing any control, confirm which architecture type applies — it determines which controls are mandatory, advisory, or not applicable.


The Three Security Objectives

Objective 1 — Secure Your Environment (Controls 1.x, 2.x, 3.x)

Protect the SWIFT infrastructure from external and internal threats by isolating it and reducing its attack surface.

Objective 2 — Know and Limit Access (Controls 4.x, 5.x)

Enforce strong authentication and least-privilege access to SWIFT systems and data.

Objective 3 — Detect and Respond (Controls 6.x, 7.x)

Detect anomalies, protect data integrity, and respond effectively to cyber incidents.


Control Summary Table (CSCF v2026)

⚠️ v2026 Change: Control 2.4 is now Mandatory (was Advisory in v2025). Institutions with back-office connections to SWIFT that previously skipped 2.4 must now implement it before their 2026 attestation.

ControlNameStatus (v2026)Objective
1.1SWIFT Environment ProtectionMandatory1
1.2OS Privileged Account ControlMandatory1
1.3AVirtualisation Platform SecurityAdvisory1
1.4Restriction of Internet AccessMandatory1
1.5ACustomer Environment ProtectionAdvisory1
2.1Internal Data Flow SecurityMandatory1
2.2Security UpdatesMandatory1
2.3System HardeningMandatory1
2.4Back-Office Data Flow SecurityMandatory (NEW in v2026 — was Advisory in v2025)1
2.5AExternal Transmission Data ProtectionAdvisory1
2.6Operator Session Confidentiality and IntegrityMandatory1
2.7Vulnerability ScanningMandatory1
2.8Critical Activity OutsourcingMandatory1
2.9ATransaction Business ControlsAdvisory1
2.10Application HardeningMandatory1
2.11ARMA Business ControlsAdvisory1
3.1Physical SecurityMandatory1
4.1Password PolicyMandatory2
4.2Multi-Factor AuthenticationMandatory2
5.1Logical Access ControlsMandatory2
5.2Token ManagementMandatory2
5.3AStaffingAdvisory2
5.4Physical and Logical Password StorageMandatory2
6.1Malware ProtectionMandatory3
6.2Software IntegrityMandatory3
6.3Database IntegrityMandatory3
6.4Log and MonitoringMandatory3
6.5AIntrusion DetectionAdvisory3
7.1Cyber Incident Response PlanningMandatory3
7.2Security Training and AwarenessMandatory3
7.3APenetration TestingAdvisory3
7.4AScenario Risk AssessmentAdvisory3

(A = Advisory control)


Control 2.4 — Back-Office Data Flow Security (Now Mandatory)

This is the most significant change in CSCF v2026. Organizations that skipped 2.4 as advisory must now implement it.

What Control 2.4 requires:

  • All data flows between the SWIFT secure zone and back-office systems must be protected
  • Encryption of data in transit between SWIFT and back-office (trading systems, core banking, payment hubs)
  • Authentication of back-office systems connecting to the SWIFT zone
  • Prevention of unauthorized data exfiltration via back-office channels
  • Network segmentation between SWIFT zone and back-office environment

Common gaps when 2.4 was advisory:

  • Unencrypted messaging between SWIFT Alliance and back-office payment hub
  • No mutual TLS or equivalent authentication on back-office connections
  • Shared network segments between SWIFT zone and general back-office VLAN

Remediation approach:

  1. Map all data flows between SWIFT secure zone and back-office systems
  2. Implement TLS 1.2+ with certificate-based mutual authentication on all connections
  3. Place all back-office connections through a dedicated interface within the secure zone
  4. Apply firewall rules restricting back-office access to named IP addresses/ports only
  5. Log all back-office connection events to the SIEM

How to Respond

Match your output to the task type:

TaskOutput Format
Gap assessmentTable: Control ID | Control Name | Status (🔴/🟡/🟢) | Evidence Required | Gap Notes
Architecture scopingTable mapping architecture type to applicable controls
Control deep-diveStructured narrative: Purpose → Requirement → Implementation steps → Evidence artifacts
KYC-SA attestation prepChecklist by control with attestation status and evidence pointers
Incident responseStep-by-step procedure with SWIFT notification obligations
Cross-framework mappingSide-by-side table (CSCF ↔ ISO 27001 / PCI DSS / NIST CSF)
v2025 → v2026 gapFocus specifically on Control 2.4 mandatory upgrade requirements

Always cite the specific control number (e.g., 4.2, 6.4) — not just the control name.


Key Implementation Priorities

The following controls are the highest-risk and most commonly cited in SWIFT assessments:

  1. 4.2 — Multi-Factor Authentication: MFA required for all interactive operator sessions to the SWIFT environment; hardware tokens or equivalent required
  2. 2.4 — Back-Office Data Flow Security: Now mandatory in v2026; encrypt and authenticate all back-office connections
  3. 1.1 — SWIFT Environment Protection: Dedicated secure zone; no browsing from SWIFT servers; network segregation with firewall rules
  4. 6.4 — Log and Monitoring: All SWIFT system events and transactions logged; anomaly alerts; minimum 1-year retention
  5. 2.2 — Security Updates: Patches applied within 90 days for critical; emergency patches within 3 days
  6. 6.2 — Software Integrity: Verify integrity of SWIFT software before installation and after updates
  7. 2.3 — System Hardening: CIS Benchmark hardening or equivalent; remove all unnecessary services
  8. 1.4 — Internet Restriction: SWIFT infrastructure must not have direct internet access; jump servers required

Annual Assessment and Attestation Timeline

ActivityTiming
v2026 attestation window opensJuly 1, 2026
Assessment periodJuly 1 – December 31, 2026
KYC-SA attestation deadlineDecember 31, 2026 (v2026 window)
Counterparty visibility of attestationImmediately upon submission
Non-attesting user flagged to counterpartiesAfter deadline
CSCF v2027 publication expectedJuly 2026

Note: The traditional annual deadline of July 31 applied under prior cycles. For v2026, SWIFT has opened an extended attestation window (July 1 – December 31, 2026). Verify current PMO guidance at swift.com/myswift.


Common Findings and Remediation

ControlCommon FindingRemediation
2.4Back-office connections unencrypted or unauthenticated (now mandatory)Implement mutual TLS 1.2+ on all back-office data flows; segment with dedicated firewall rules
4.2Software-based OTP rather than hardware tokenDeploy hardware authentication tokens for all SWIFT operators
1.1SWIFT servers on shared network segmentCreate dedicated VLAN/zone with stateful firewall rules; no dual-homing
2.2Critical patches >90 days overdueEstablish patch management process: critical=3 days, high=90 days
6.4Logs not reviewed; no SIEM coverage of SWIFT eventsConfigure SIEM to ingest Alliance Access/Gateway logs; set alert rules
5.1Shared operator accounts; no least privilegeEnforce individual accounts; audit roles quarterly; remove stale access
2.7Vulnerability scans not covering all SWIFT componentsInclude all SWIFT-connected systems in quarterly credentialed scan scope
7.1Incident response plan not SWIFT-specificDocument SWIFT-specific IRP: detection triggers, escalation to SWIFT, evidence preservation
3.1Server room access not loggedImplement card access with audit trail; restrict to named individuals

Reference Files

For deeper content, read these files as needed:

  • references/swift-controls.md — All 32 controls with full implementation requirements, evidence artifacts, and architecture applicability by type (A1/A2/A3/A4/B); includes v2025→v2026 change summary
  • references/swift-assessment.md — KYC-SA attestation process, independent assessor requirements, cross-framework mapping (ISO 27001, PCI DSS, NIST CSF), and SWIFT-specific incident reporting obligations

This skill provides general compliance information, not legal advice. Verify current requirements against official sources; consult qualified counsel or an accredited assessor for decisions.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.