Grid trading
Skill Superior-Trade/superior-skills/skills/v2/strategies/grid-trading
Open agent skills and tool schemas for Superior Trade — build, backtest, and deploy trading strategies on Hyperliquid
npx -y skills add Superior-Trade/superior-skills --skill grid-tradingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when writing a profit-laddered position-adjustment strategy on Superior Trade — anything described as a grid bot, range fade, range harvest, ladder buy, scaling-in, pyramiding, or "buy more when it dips and sell partials when it rallies". Note this is a profit-driven ladder, not a true 20-rung order-book grid; explain that limitation when the user asks for true grid trading.
SKILL.md
8.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Strategy: Grid · Range Fade (laddered)
When to use
A user asks for "grid trading", "grid bot", "range fade", "ladder buy", "scale into the dip", "pyramid into a position", "DCA on drawdown" (not on calendar — that's strategy-dca-weekly). Anything where the trigger to add is a price drawdown, and there are partial take-profits on the way up.
Important caveat — explain this upfront
Freqtrade is a one-trade-per-pair engine. A real 20-rung grid bot — placing 20 limit orders simultaneously on the order book and refilling each as it fills — is not possible without engine changes. What you can implement is a profit-laddered position adjustment:
- 1 initial entry at a trigger price
- Up to N additional entries, each at a deeper drawdown step (−1%, −2%, …)
- Partial take-profits at progressive profit steps (+1.5%, +3%, +4.5%, …)
- Hard exit on a band breakout
This is a working, profitable approximation of the spirit of grid trading. If the user explicitly wants 100s of small fills per day on a tight book, say so and recommend running a separate grid runtime alongside Freqtrade.
Backtest reference
| Window | ETH/USDC 15m, 2026-03-01 → 2026-05-01 (61 days) |
|---|---|
| Trades | 4 |
| Win rate | 100% |
| Wallet PnL | +0.66% / +$65.58 |
| Sharpe | 2.02 |
| Profit per trade | $15-30 |
| Avg holding | 14 days |
| Max DD | 0% (intraday only) |
| Backtest ID | 01kqyz25d0zrwwf5fzccjk44dk |
Order pattern per trade: 2 entries ("" initial + grid_buy_1) + 4 partial exits at grid_tp_* tags. Sparse — 4 trades over 61 days — because the 24h VWAP −1% trigger fires rarely on ETH. Tighten the trigger (e.g. vwap × 0.995) for more activity.
Reference implementation
from freqtrade.strategy import IStrategy
from freqtrade.persistence import Trade
from datetime import datetime
import pandas as pd
class EthGridStrategy(IStrategy):
minimal_roi = {"0": 100.0} # never auto-close on ROI; partials handled in adjust_trade_position
stoploss = -0.30 # safety net, deeper than the deepest ladder rung
trailing_stop = False
timeframe = "15m"
process_only_new_candles = True
startup_candle_count = 200
can_short = False
position_adjustment_enable = True
max_entry_position_adjustment = 5 # 5 ladder rungs below entry
max_dca_multiplier = 6.0 # 1 + 5 adds
def populate_indicators(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame:
# 24h VWAP on 15m bars (96 bars).
tp = (dataframe["high"] + dataframe["low"] + dataframe["close"]) / 3.0
pv = tp * dataframe["volume"]
dataframe["vwap_24h"] = (
pv.rolling(96).sum() / dataframe["volume"].rolling(96).sum()
)
return dataframe
def populate_entry_trend(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame:
# First grid rung: 1% below 24h VWAP.
dataframe.loc[
(dataframe["close"] <= dataframe["vwap_24h"] * 0.99)
& (dataframe["volume"] > 0),
"enter_long",
] = 1
return dataframe
def populate_exit_trend(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame:
# Hard close on band breakout up.
dataframe.loc[
dataframe["close"] >= dataframe["vwap_24h"] * 1.06,
"exit_long",
] = 1
return dataframe
def custom_stake_amount(self, pair: str, current_time: datetime, current_rate: float,
proposed_stake: float, min_stake, max_stake: float,
leverage: float, entry_tag, side: str, **kwargs) -> float:
return proposed_stake / self.max_dca_multiplier
def adjust_trade_position(self, trade: Trade, current_time: datetime,
current_rate: float, current_profit: float,
min_stake, max_stake: float,
current_entry_rate: float, current_exit_rate: float,
current_entry_profit: float, current_exit_profit: float,
**kwargs):
if trade.has_open_orders:
return None
n_entries = trade.nr_of_successful_entries
n_exits = trade.nr_of_successful_exits
# Ladder buys: every -1% from average entry, up to 5 adds.
if n_entries <= 5 and current_profit <= -0.01 * n_entries:
filled = trade.select_filled_orders(trade.entry_side)
first_stake = filled[0].stake_amount_filled if filled else (min_stake or 10)
return (first_stake, f"grid_buy_{n_entries}")
# Partial profit-take: every +1.5% above avg entry, up to 3 ladders.
if n_exits < 3 and current_profit >= 0.015 * (n_exits + 1):
return (-(trade.stake_amount / 4.0), f"grid_tp_{n_exits}")
return None
Config requirements
{
"exchange": { "name": "hyperliquid", "pair_whitelist": ["ETH/USDC"] },
"stake_currency": "USDC",
"stake_amount": 1000,
"dry_run_wallet": 10000,
"timeframe": "15m",
"max_open_trades": 1,
"stoploss": -0.30,
"minimal_roi": { "0": 100.0 },
"entry_pricing": { "price_side": "same" },
"exit_pricing": { "price_side": "same" },
"pairlists": [{ "method": "StaticPairList" }]
}
dry_run_wallet ≥ stake_amount is enforced strictly. With 6 ladder rungs, leave headroom — dry_run_wallet ≥ stake_amount × 1.5 is comfortable.
Tunable parameters
| Knob | Effect |
|---|---|
0.99 (entry trigger) | Tighter (0.995) → more entries, more chop. Looser (0.97) → rarer, deeper fades. |
0.01 * n_entries (ladder spacing) | Tighter spacing → faster ladder fills, smaller gain per rung. Wider spacing → fewer rungs in chop. |
max_entry_position_adjustment | More rungs → bigger position when fully laddered, more wallet exposure. |
0.015 * (n_exits + 1) (TP step) | Tighter TPs → more partial closes, less per close. |
1.06 (band breakout) | Tighter (1.04) → exit earlier on rallies, capture less. |
trade.stake_amount / 4.0 (TP size) | Smaller divisor → bigger partial closes. / 2.0 halves the position per TP. |
Common pitfalls
- Naive single-rung implementation. Using
populate_entry_trendwithclose < vwap × 0.94andpopulate_exit_trendwithclose > vwap × 1.06produced 0 trades on the same window — ETH never reached the lower band. The laddered version captures the moves the band misses. stoplosstoo shallow. With 5 ladder rungs at −1% spacing, a−6%stop kills the trade before the deepest rung fills. Use−30%(or deeper) and rely on partial exits.- Letting
minimal_roiclose trades early. With the default{"0": 0.02}, the trade exits at +2% before the partial-TP ladder ever runs. Set{"0": 100.0}to disable. - Forgetting
current_profitis signed.current_profit <= -0.01 * n_entriesreads "drawdown is at least n × 1%". Inverting the sign disables the ladder.
Variants
- Wider band:
0.97entry /1.10exit for trending pairs (BTC, SOL). - Asymmetric ladder: more buys than sells (
max_entry_position_adjustment = 8, only 2 partial TPs) for accumulation modes. - Volatility-scaled steps: replace fixed
0.01withatr_pct * 0.5to make ladder spacing follow regime.
When grid is the wrong tool
- Strong trends (the band breakout closes the trade after one cycle).
- Pairs that gap (Hyperliquid index pairs sometimes skip the trigger price entirely).
- Tight fee budgets — every ladder rung pays maker/taker fees twice (entry and partial exit). See
fees-optimizationsfor cost analysis.
Sources
- Freqtrade
adjust_trade_position— https://www.freqtrade.io/en/stable/strategy-callbacks/#adjust-trade-position - Internal audit —
docs/standard-strategies-audit.md, backtest01kqyz25d0zrwwf5fzccjk44dk