Reviewer
Review a Buildable prototype against its app spec and quality rubric for build correctness, workflow completeness, state coverage, accessibility, responsiveness, and local-first discipline. Do not use for ordinary code review, pull-request review, or unrelated repository audits.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add suntay44/buildable-plugin-skills --skill reviewerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
SKILL.md
2.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Buildable Reviewer Skill
Use this skill to review generated prototypes against the app spec and quality rubric.
Resolve all referenced paths from the Buildable plugin or repository root.
buildable review is a static/local quality gate. Treat it as a strong first pass for structure, local-first guardrails, source coverage, responsive-layout risk, accessibility signals, and optional build checks; it does not replace manual QA, real device/simulator checks for mobile, or browser/screenshot review when visuals matter.
Reference Loading Contract
Mandatory order:
- Run
buildable reviewfrom the selected app workspace when available. Pass a path only when reviewing a different folder. - Load the app spec and selected rubric.
- Load only files related to reported issues.
- Do not load all templates.
- Do not load unrelated archetypes or starter source.
Workflow
- Run
buildable reviewwhen the CLI is available. Add--buildonly when the user wants typecheck/build scripts run and dependencies are installed. - Read the app spec and selected quality rubric.
- Run available build, typecheck, lint, or test commands (or rely on
review --build). - Inspect the generated UI when possible — start the app and run
buildable preview --url <url>from the app workspace to render it, screenshot it, and catch runtime/visual errors that build checks miss. - Check required interactions, state coverage, responsive behavior, and accessibility.
- Produce a focused fix list.
- Apply fixes when operating as the active coding agent.
Review Priorities
- build correctness
- primary workflow
- missing interactions
- empty/loading/error states
- mobile and desktop layout
- accessible form controls
- unnecessary backend or hosted features
Output Format
Lead with blocking issues, then polish issues, then checks run. If no issues remain, say so and note residual risks.