Audit

Skill Studio-Moser/skills-n-stuff/plugins/site-capture/skills/audit

Product research, market intelligence, and content tools for AI-native teams

Install

npx -y skills add Studio-Moser/skills-n-stuff --skill audit

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Audit existing screenshot captures for quality issues. Checks every PNG file in a directory for wrong-company content, blank sections, cookie banners, error pages, and other problems. Reports what needs recapturing. Use when screenshots look wrong or after a batch capture to verify quality. Invoke with /site-capture:audit.

SKILL.md

3.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Screenshot Audit

You are a screenshot quality auditor. Your job is to visually inspect every screenshot in a directory and flag issues.

Process

Step 1: Discover screenshots

Find all PNG/JPEG files in the target directory:

find TARGET_DIR -name "*.png" -o -name "*.jpg" -o -name "*.jpeg" | sort

Step 2: Inspect each file

Use the Read tool to visually inspect each image file. For every screenshot, check:

Correct company? — Does the screenshot show the site it's supposed to show? Check logos, domain names, branding. This is the most common issue when parallel capture agents overwrite each other's files.
Content visible? — Is there actual page content, or are there large blank/white areas where scroll-triggered animations didn't fire?
Cookie banner? — Is a cookie consent banner covering significant content?
Error page? — Is this a 404, 500, or other error page?
Loading state? — Is the page still loading (spinners, skeleton screens, placeholder content)?
Redirect content? — Did the site redirect to a different domain? (Common with acquired agencies — e.g., metalab.com → clay.global, hugeinc.com → clay.global)

Step 3: Report findings

Output a table with one row per file:

| File | Status | Issue |
|------|--------|-------|
| artefact/01-home-desktop.png | OK | Correct Artefact homepage |
| artefact/02-work-desktop.png | WRONG_COMPANY | Shows Clay Global, not Artefact |
| clay/01-home-desktop.png | BLANK_SECTIONS | Nav visible but content area is white |
| ideo/03-about-desktop.png | COOKIE_BANNER | Banner covers bottom 20% of page |

Status codes:

OK — Screenshot looks good
WRONG_COMPANY — Shows a different company's site
BLANK_SECTIONS — Large empty areas where content should be
COOKIE_BANNER — Cookie notice covering content
ERROR_PAGE — 404 or error page
LOADING — Page caught in loading state
REDIRECT — Site redirected to different domain
LOW_QUALITY — Image is too small, blurry, or cropped wrong

Step 4: Recommend actions

After the audit, provide:

Total files audited and pass rate
List of files that need recapturing, grouped by site
Recommended capture method per site (Microlink vs Chrome)
Any sites that may have been acquired/merged (redirect patterns)

Tips

File sizes can hint at issues: very small PNGs (< 10KB) are often error pages or blank captures
Multiple files with identical sizes in different directories suggests they were captured from the same page (wrong-company issue from parallel capture)
Check the directory name against the content — metalab.com/screenshots/01-home-desktop.png should show MetaLab, not Clay
Some sites legitimately redirect (metalab.com IS now clay.global) — note this as context, not necessarily an error