Stakeholder prewire
Skill stephenrogan/leadership-skills/skills/stakeholder-prewire
Builds a stakeholder prewire plan with influence map, likely objections, conversation sequence, audience-specific framing, decision asks, and alignment tracker. Use before cross-functional proposals, executive decisions, process changes, or politically sensitive initiatives.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add stephenrogan/leadership-skills --skill stakeholder-prewireAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
4.5 KB, 794 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Stakeholder Prewire
Overview
Use this skill to support the leader as Organisational influencer. A prewire plan that gets alignment before the meeting instead of hoping the meeting creates it.
This skill is human-led by design: the agent prepares the work, but the human leader owns judgment, relationship, accountability, and final decisions.
When to Use
Run this skill when:
- Decision requires people who do not report to the leader
- A proposal could trigger objections or territorial conflict
- Exec meeting should not be the first time stakeholders hear the idea
Do not use it as a substitute for legal, HR, finance, security, medical, or executive approval. If the workflow affects employment, compensation, customer commitments, external messaging, or sensitive personal data, prepare the packet and stop for human review.
Inputs
Ask for or gather:
- Proposal or decision memo
- Stakeholder list and influence levels
- Known incentives, objections, and dependencies
- Desired decision and fallback options
If inputs are missing, proceed with explicit assumptions and label confidence. Do not invent private context, motives, or facts.
Workflow
Follow this sequence:
- Map stakeholders by influence, impact, support, and likely concern
- Sequence conversations from allies to blockers to decision-makers
- Tailor the message to each stakeholder’s incentives and risk lens
- Prepare objection responses and concessions that do not violate principles
- Track alignment status and unresolved issues
Before finalizing, run the boundary check: what is evidence, what is interpretation, what is a recommendation, and what must remain a human decision?
Output Format
Produce a concise, decision-ready artifact using this structure:
# Stakeholder Prewire
## Situation
[Brief context and why this workflow is being run.]
## Evidence and Signals
- Fact:
- Pattern:
- Hypothesis, confidence:
## Recommended Focus
1. [Highest leverage focus]
2. [Second focus]
3. [Third focus, optional]
## Working Artifact
[Agenda, memo, brief, plan, map, script, or tracker depending on the workflow.]
## Human Decisions Required
- [Decision/action the agent must not take.]
## Follow-Up
- Owner:
- Date:
- Success signal:
Expected deliverables:
- Stakeholder map
- Prewire sequence
- Conversation briefs
- Objection response guide
- Alignment tracker
See assets/output-template.md for a reusable version.
Human Decision Boundary
The agent may prepare, synthesize, compare, draft, and track. The agent must not cross these boundaries:
- Do not manipulate or misrepresent tradeoffs
- Do not promise concessions without approval
- Human leader owns relationship capital and live negotiation
Stop and ask for explicit approval before sending messages, changing employment status, making customer promises, publishing, sharing sensitive information, or committing budget/resources.
Quality Bar
A strong output for this skill:
- Separates facts, interpretations, hypotheses, and recommendations.
- Names uncertainty and missing context instead of hiding it.
- Produces an artifact a busy leader can use immediately.
- Reduces avoidance, ambiguity, rework, or decision drift.
- Makes the human judgment boundary visible.
- Includes concrete follow-up with owner, date, and success signal where applicable.
Failure Modes
Watch for these mistakes:
- Overconfident claims from thin notes or sentiment.
- Generic management advice with no artifact.
- Automating sensitive judgment instead of preparing it.
- Producing too many options without a recommended default.
- Treating leadership as text generation rather than accountability.
References
- Michael Watkins, The First 90 Days: stakeholder mapping
- Influence without authority practices
- Minto Pyramid Principle for structured persuasion
For the shared methodology spine, see ../../docs/SOURCE-SPINE.md.
What ships with it: 3 files
4.5 KB alongside SKILL.md
assets/
- output-template.md384 B
evals/
- evals.json3.1 KB
references/
- framework.md993 B
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most operations skills give in 794 tokens
Counted across 483 of the 484 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Collect monitoring data throughout the simulationin 14 of 483, across 6 files
- Set the random seed for reproducibilityin 14 of 483, across 6 files
- Validate simulations against analytical solutionsin 12 of 483, across 4 files
- Clarify goals, constraints, and inputsin 11 of 483, across 2 files
- Implement contract tests for integration pointsin 11 of 483, across 2 files
- Implement strangler fig infrastructure with API gatewayin 11 of 483, across 2 files
- Audit modernized components for security vulnerabilitiesin 11 of 483, across 2 files
- Avoid Python blocking calls in processesin 10 of 483, across 3 files
- Use resource context managers for automatic cleanupin 9 of 483, across 2 files
- Maintain consistent time unitsin 9 of 483, across 2 files
- Validate outcomes against success criteriain 8 of 483, across 1 file
- Analyze the legacy codebase for technical debtin 8 of 483, across 1 file
Said here and by no other author read
- map stakeholders by influence impact support and concern
- sequence conversations from allies to blockers to decision-makers
- prepare objection responses and approved concessions
- track alignment status and unresolved issues
- separate facts interpretations hypotheses and recommendations
- produce concrete follow-up with owner date and success signal
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.