agentsclimarketplace

Qbr content assembler

Skill stephenrogan/csm-skills/skills/qbr-content-assembler

58 plug-and-play agent skills for Customer Success Managers. Works from a single conversation. Scales to a production system.

Install
npx -y skills add stephenrogan/csm-skills --skill qbr-content-assembler

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Builds structured QBR deck content from manually provided account data including usage metrics, health indicators, support history, value evidence, and customer goals. Produces slide-by-slide content organised by segment template. Use when asked to build a QBR deck, prepare quarterly business review content, assemble QBR slides from data, create a customer review presentation, or when a CSM has data and needs it structured for a QBR. Also triggers for questions about QBR preparation, business review content, customer presentation assembly, or quarterly review slide creation.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

8.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

QBR Content Assembler

Builds QBR deck content from account data you provide. Give it the metrics, health indicators, support history, and goals -- it produces structured slide content ready to drop into a presentation template.

Distinct from the pre-call prep builder (which is a brief for you) -- this produces content for the customer. Every data point should be something you are comfortable presenting to the room.

How to Use

Provide as much of the following as you have:

Account basics:

  • Account name, ARR, product tier, contract tenure
  • Primary contacts attending the QBR (names, roles)
  • Customer's stated goals (from the success plan, onboarding, or prior QBRs)

Usage and adoption data:

  • Active users and trend (growing, stable, declining)
  • Key features used and not used
  • Workflow completions or core use-case metrics
  • Licence utilisation (active users vs. purchased seats)

Health and engagement:

  • Overall health assessment (strong, healthy, at risk, critical)
  • Recent touchpoints (calls, emails, meetings)
  • Open items or outstanding commitments from either side

Support history:

  • Ticket count, resolution time, open issues
  • CSAT score if available
  • Any escalations or notable support events

Value evidence:

  • Time saved, productivity gains, or ROI metrics
  • Customer-confirmed outcomes ("they told us X")
  • Estimated value if no confirmed metrics exist

Looking ahead:

  • Product roadmap items relevant to this customer
  • Adoption opportunities (features they should be using but are not)
  • Expansion signals or commercial context
  • Risks or concerns to address

Deck Templates by Segment

Enterprise QBR (10-15 slides, 45-60 minutes)

SlideContentWhat You ProvideWhat the Skill Produces
1Title and agendaMeeting details, attendeesFormatted title slide and agenda structure
2Executive summaryYour top 3-5 pointsStructured summary with headline metric, health status, and key discussion topic
3Relationship timelineKey milestones since last QBRChronological milestone view with dates and outcomes
4-5Usage and adoptionUsage metrics, feature dataCharts-ready data with period-over-period comparison and adoption heatmap
6Value deliveredROI metrics, outcomesHeadline metric with supporting evidence and benchmark context if available
7Support summaryTicket data, CSATFormatted support review with trend indicators
8Product roadmapRelevant upcoming featuresFeature list with relevance framing for this customer
9Strategic recommendationsYou write thisPlaceholder with suggested structure (the most important slide -- cannot be generated from data alone)
10DiscussionTopics for open discussionSuggested discussion questions based on account context
11Action itemsCaptured liveTemplate for capturing commitments with owner and deadline columns

Mid-Market QBR (8-10 slides, 30-45 minutes)

Same structure with slides 3 and 8 consolidated. Less granular data, more narrative. Usage section is 1 slide, not 2.

SMB Business Review (5-6 slides or email format, 20-30 minutes)

SlideContent
1Usage snapshot (key metrics, trend, headline)
2Value highlights (top 2-3 outcomes)
3Tips and recommendations (adoption opportunities)
4What is coming (product updates, next steps)
5Action items

For SMB accounts, the skill also offers an email-format alternative -- same content structured as a concise email rather than a deck, for reviews done async instead of in a meeting.

Comparison Views

For every data slide, the skill produces comparison context:

ComparisonWhat It ShowsWhen to Use
Period-over-periodThis quarter vs. last quarterEvery data slide -- shows trajectory
Year-over-yearSame quarter last year (if data exists)Value slide -- shows long-term trend
Plan vs. actualSuccess plan targets vs. current metricsIf a success plan exists with measurable milestones
Peer benchmarkAccount vs. similar companiesIf you have benchmark data (from your knowledge of the segment)

You do not need to provide all comparisons. The skill uses whatever prior-period data you provide and labels what is current vs. historical.

Output Format

The skill produces slide-by-slide content in a structured format:

## Slide 1: Title and Agenda

**Quarterly Business Review: Acme Corp**
Q1 2026 | April 15, 2026

Attendees: Tom Chen (VP Engineering), Lisa Park (Eng Manager), Jane Doe (CSM)

Agenda:
1. Usage and adoption review (10 min)
2. Value delivered this quarter (10 min)
3. Support summary (5 min)
4. Looking ahead: roadmap and adoption opportunities (10 min)
5. Discussion (15 min)
6. Action items (5 min)

---

## Slide 2: Executive Summary

**Health: Improving** | Score equivalent: ~74 (up from ~68 last quarter)

Headlines:
- Usage growing: 42% DAU/MAU ratio, up from 38% last quarter
- Value: estimated 340 hours saved through automated workflows this quarter
- Support: clean quarter -- 12 tickets, 4.2-hour average resolution, 4.6/5 CSAT
- Discussion topic: Advanced Reporting adoption -- your analytics team could save additional time

---

## Slide 4: Usage and Adoption

**Active Users:** 47 of 60 seats (78% utilisation, up from 72%)
**Feature Adoption:** 18 of 24 available features used (75% breadth)

Features driving value:
- Workflow Automation: 2,847 executions this quarter (+22% QoQ)
- Team Dashboards: Daily use by 35 users
- API Integration: 12 active connections

Adoption opportunities:
- Advanced Reporting: untouched. 78% of companies your size use this feature
- Custom Alerts: explored but not adopted. Could replace manual monitoring

[Continue for all slides...]

Quality Gates

Before delivering the content:

  • Customer-safe: No internal terminology, risk scores, or CSM assessments visible. This is a customer-facing deck -- only include data the customer should see
  • Data-backed: Every claim has a number. "Usage is growing" is weak. "DAU/MAU increased from 38% to 42% quarter-over-quarter" is strong
  • Balanced: Do not present only good news. If there are support issues or adoption gaps, address them honestly. Customers respect transparency and distrust decks that only highlight positives
  • Action-oriented: Every section should lead somewhere. Usage data leads to adoption recommendations. Value evidence leads to renewal confidence. Support history leads to resolution commitment or acknowledgement
  • Scannable: Each slide should be readable in 30 seconds. If a slide requires narration to make sense, it has too much text or unclear charts
  • Strategic recommendation slide is a placeholder: Mark it clearly. Do not generate generic recommendations -- this slide requires your judgment about the account's future direction and is the highest-value part of the QBR

Principles

  • The QBR exists to demonstrate value and align on direction. If the customer walks out feeling the product is worth the investment and knowing what comes next, the QBR succeeded. Every slide should contribute to one of those two outcomes
  • Lead with value, not with usage. Usage is an input; value is the output the customer cares about. "340 hours saved" matters more than "2,847 workflow executions"
  • The best QBR decks start a conversation, not deliver a monologue. Build in discussion points and questions. A QBR where the customer talks more than the CSM is a better QBR
  • If you do not have data for a slide, skip the slide rather than presenting vague content. A concise 7-slide deck with strong data beats a 12-slide deck with filler

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.