agentsclimarketplace

Lo qbr orchestrator

Skill stephenrogan/augmented-csm/skills/pillar-2-lifecycle-orchestration/lo-qbr-orchestrator

38 agent skills for the complete CSM operational surface area. Built to the Agent Skills open standard.

Install
npx -y skills add stephenrogan/augmented-csm --skill lo-qbr-orchestrator

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Manages the end-to-end QBR process including scheduling, attendee coordination, content preparation, and follow-up tracking. Use when asked to schedule a QBR, prepare a business review, build QBR content, automate QBR preparation, coordinate a quarterly review, generate a QBR deck, or when any account needs a structured business review. Also triggers for questions about business review cadence, executive review preparation, or customer success review meetings.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

7.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

QBR Orchestrator

Manages the Quarterly Business Review lifecycle from scheduling through follow-up. Coordinates attendees, generates data-rich content, prepares the CSM, and tracks action items post-QBR. Part of the Lifecycle Orchestration pillar.

This is a coordination and content generation skill. It handles logistics and data assembly. The CSM leads the QBR itself -- framing the narrative, navigating the conversation, and making strategic recommendations. That is pure human territory.

When to Run

  • Triggered: When a QBR is due based on the account's QBR cadence (typically quarterly, may vary by segment)
  • Scheduled: 4 weeks before the target QBR date, the skill begins the preparation workflow
  • On-demand: When a CSM requests QBR preparation for a specific account outside the regular cadence

QBR Preparation Workflow

T-28 Days: Initiate

  1. Check QBR eligibility: account must be past onboarding (lifecycle stage = "Adopted" or later)
  2. Propose 3 date/time options based on CSM and primary customer contact availability
  3. Send scheduling request to customer with proposed times
  4. Create QBR project record in CRM

T-21 Days: Confirm and Coordinate

  1. Confirm date with customer (follow up if no response within 5 business days)
  2. Identify recommended attendees:
    • From customer: primary contact, executive sponsor, key stakeholders based on QBR focus
    • From vendor: CSM, CSM manager (for strategic accounts), product specialist (if product discussion planned)
  3. Send calendar invites to all confirmed attendees
  4. Begin content assembly (see Content Generation below)

T-7 Days: Content Delivery

  1. Generate the QBR content package (deck + briefing notes)
  2. Deliver to CSM for review and customisation
  3. Surface any new signals (risk, expansion, competitive) that have emerged since T-28
  4. Generate the CSM's internal prep brief (different from the customer-facing deck)

T-0: QBR Day

  1. Send reminder to all attendees (morning of, if meeting is afternoon; day before, if morning)
  2. Ensure the CSM has the latest account brief
  3. No agent involvement during the meeting -- this is fully human-led

T+1 to T+3: Follow-Up

  1. Generate post-QBR summary from CSM's notes (CSM inputs notes; agent structures and distributes)
  2. Create action items in CRM from the summary
  3. Send follow-up email to customer with summary and action items (CSM reviews before send)
  4. Set tracking triggers for each action item (due dates, owners)
  5. Schedule the next QBR (add to the cadence calendar)

Content Generation

Customer-Facing QBR Deck

The agent generates a data-rich deck that the CSM then customises with narrative and strategic framing.

Deck structure:

SlideContent SourceAgent vs. Human
TitleAccount name, date, attendeesAGENT generates
AgendaStandard QBR agenda with customisable sectionsAGENT generates, HUMAN customises
Relationship SummaryKey contacts, engagement history, milestones since last QBRAGENT generates from CRM data
Usage and AdoptionUsage metrics, trends, benchmark comparisons, feature adoptionAGENT generates from product analytics and bi-usage-monitor
Value DeliveredROI metrics, outcomes achieved, workflow completionsAGENT generates from product analytics
Health OverviewHealth score trend, component breakdown (customer-appropriate framing)AGENT generates from bi-health-score (sanitised -- no internal risk language)
Support SummaryTicket volume, resolution metrics, open itemsAGENT generates from support platform
Roadmap AlignmentUpcoming product features relevant to customer's use caseAGENT generates from product roadmap data
Strategic RecommendationsAdoption expansion, use case deepening, risk mitigationHUMAN writes -- this is the CSM's strategic contribution
Action ItemsAgreed next steps from the QBR conversationHUMAN captures during/after the QBR

CSM Internal Prep Brief

Separate from the customer deck. For the CSM's eyes only.

Content:

  • Full account brief (from bi-account-brief, renewal context)
  • Active risk signals with evidence (not for sharing with customer)
  • Expansion signals with recommended framing
  • Competitive intelligence (if any)
  • Stakeholder dynamics: who will be in the room, their role, last engagement, known positions
  • Suggested talking points and questions
  • Landmines to avoid (open support issues, known frustrations, political sensitivities from CSM notes)

Output Format

QBR status record:

{
  "account_id": "string",
  "qbr_date": "2026-04-15",
  "status": "content_ready",
  "attendees_confirmed": ["Tom Chen (VP Eng)", "Sarah Kim (CFO)", "Jane Doe (CSM)", "Mike Ross (CS Manager)"],
  "deck_generated": true,
  "csm_review_complete": false,
  "prep_brief_generated": true,
  "follow_up_actions": [],
  "next_qbr_target": "2026-07-15"
}

Handoff to Human

Decision PointContext ProvidedWhat the Human Decides
Attendee selectionStakeholder map, engagement history, QBR focus areasWho should be in the room and why
Deck customisationData-populated deck, prep briefNarrative framing, strategic recommendations, what to emphasise or downplay
Leading the QBRPrep brief, latest signalsHow to run the conversation, respond to questions, navigate difficult topics
Action item prioritisationAction items captured during QBRWhich items to commit to, timelines, ownership
Follow-up email approvalDraft follow-up with summary and action itemsWhether the tone, commitments, and framing are accurate

Confidence and Limitations

  • High confidence for scheduling, content assembly, and follow-up tracking -- structured workflows
  • Medium confidence for deck content quality -- data is accurate but narrative requires human curation
  • Cannot generate strategic recommendations (Slide 9) -- this is the CSM's highest-value contribution
  • Cannot assess whether the QBR was successful (requires human judgment on customer response)
  • Cannot adapt in real-time during the QBR to unexpected topics or customer reactions

Dependencies

Required:

  • CRM API (account data, contacts, activities)
  • Calendar integration (scheduling, attendee coordination)
  • Product analytics (usage data for deck content)
  • bi-account-brief (prep brief generation)

Strongly recommended:

  • bi-health-score (health data for deck)
  • bi-usage-monitor (usage trends for deck)
  • bi-risk-detector (risk signals for prep brief)
  • bi-expansion-detector (expansion signals for prep brief)
  • Document/deck generation capability

References

  • references/qbr-templates.md -- Deck templates, agenda structures, and follow-up email formats

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.