Shipkit review planning
Skill stefan-stepzero/shipkit/install/skills/shipkit-review-planning
Internal reviewer — assesses planning artifact alignment. Checks definitions agree, specs cover roadmap, no gaps. A per-unit reviewer invoked by a caller (the engine in steered mode or a direction/planning caller), not for direct use.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add stefan-stepzero/shipkit --skill shipkit-review-planningAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
4.6 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
shipkit-review-planning - Planning Assessment
Purpose: Read all planning artifacts and cross-reference them for alignment. Write a structured assessment for the planning orchestrator.
Input
Required artifacts (the planning phase must produce all of these):
.shipkit/stack.json.shipkit/codebase-index.json.shipkit/spec-roadmap.json.shipkit/specs/*.json— at least one spec per roadmap item.shipkit/plans/*.json— at least one plan per spec.shipkit/test-cases/— test specifications.shipkit/user-tasks.json— manual user tasks
Direction context (produced by prior loop, read for cross-reference):
.shipkit/why.json.shipkit/product-definition.json,.shipkit/engineering-definition.json.shipkit/architecture.json.shipkit/goals/strategic.json,.shipkit/goals/product.json,.shipkit/goals/engineering.json
Alignment Checks
-
Completeness: Are ALL required planning artifacts present? Missing artifacts are gaps.
-
Product ↔ Engineering: Every product feature has a corresponding mechanism?
-
Definition ↔ Specs: Every defined feature has a spec?
-
Specs ↔ Roadmap: Roadmap includes all specs with sensible priority?
-
Plans ↔ Specs: Every spec has a plan? Plans reference the correct spec?
-
Stage alignment: Specs and plans scoped for current stage?
-
Goal coverage: Specs, if implemented, satisfy product and engineering goals?
-
Architecture consistency: Do plans align with architecture.json decisions?
-
Prerequisites by phase: Group blocking user tasks by their
blocksPhasevalue. Report separately:- Current-phase blockers (tasks where
blocksPhasematcheswhy.jsoncurrent stage ANDblocking: true) - Future-phase blockers (tasks where
blocksPhaseis a later stage) - General tasks (tasks where
blocksPhaseisnull)
Only current-phase blockers count as blocking prerequisites. Future-phase tasks are informational — do NOT count them in the blocker total. If a task has no
blocksPhasefield (legacy format), infer from context or treat as current-phase. - Current-phase blockers (tasks where
Completion Tracking
Create tasks for each alignment check:
TaskCreate: "Check 1: Completeness (all artifacts present)"TaskCreate: "Check 2: Product ↔ Engineering alignment"TaskCreate: "Check 3: Definition ↔ Specs"TaskCreate: "Check 4: Specs ↔ Roadmap"TaskCreate: "Check 5: Plans ↔ Specs"TaskCreate: "Check 6: Stage alignment"TaskCreate: "Check 7: Goal coverage"TaskCreate: "Check 8: Architecture consistency"TaskCreate: "Check 9: Prerequisites by phase"TaskCreate: "Write planning-assessment.json"
TaskUpdate each task to in_progress when starting it, completed when done.
Each check task requires evidence — do NOT mark complete without citing specific artifacts. Do NOT write the assessment until all 9 checks are completed.
Output
Write .shipkit/reviews/planning-assessment.json with structured findings.
status: "pass" when all checks pass. status: "gaps_found" with specific gaps[] entries when issues exist. Each gap must include artifact, issue, relatedArtifact, evidence, and fix fields.
For prerequisite reporting, the assessment must include a prerequisites summary object:
{
"prerequisites": {
"currentPhase": "phase-0",
"blocking": [{ "id": "...", "title": "...", "blocksPhase": "phase-0" }],
"futurePhase": [{ "id": "...", "title": "...", "blocksPhase": "phase-1" }],
"general": [{ "id": "...", "title": "...", "blocksPhase": null }]
}
}
The blocking array drives the blocker count. futurePhase and general are informational only.
After Completion
Assessment written to .shipkit/reviews/planning-assessment.json.
Next: The caller (the orchestration engine in steered mode, or a direction/planning caller) reads this assessment:
- If gaps found: re-dispatches the affected upstream skills for revision, then re-runs this reviewer.
- If pass: proceeds to the next step.
This skill is a per-unit reviewer, normally invoked by a caller (the engine in steered mode or a direction/planning caller), not directly by the user.
<!-- /SECTION:after-completion -->What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.