agentsclimarketplace

Ds package

Skill StamKavid/last-ds-mile/skills/ds-package

Wraps a handed-off model as a servable unit — inference contract, thin predict wrapper, reproducible Dockerfile — and proves it returns the same predictions it produced offline. Hard gate on that parity check. Use when someone asks to turn a model into a service, build a container or Docker image for it, or define its inference contract. Use before any deployment.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add StamKavid/last-ds-mile --skill ds-package

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

ds-package — Make It Servable, Prove Parity

Overview

/ds-handoff proves the work reruns. This stage makes it serve: it wraps the pinned model behind a stable inference contract, containerizes it reproducibly, and — the point of the stage — proves the packaged model returns the same predictions it produced offline. Training/serving skew is to deployment what target leakage is to modeling: the silent failure that passes every offline check and still ships a wrong answer. This stage exists to catch it before /ds-deploy.

It ships no code itself — it guides you to generate the contract, wrapper, and Dockerfile into your own project under .last-ds-mile/package/.

When to Use

  • After /ds-handoff has produced a pinned environment, a serialized model artifact, and a model card, and the model is ready to become a callable service.
  • NOT for further tuning or re-evaluation — if the model isn't finished, go back to /ds-model or /ds-evaluate.
  • NOT for text, vision, recommenders, or forecasting stacks — outside plugin scope.

Core Process

  1. Gate check. Confirm the /ds-handoff artifacts exist: a pinned environment (lockfile or exact-version requirements.txt/environment.yml), a serialized model with its version and training-data hash/date, and a model card. If any is missing, produce it now (run /ds-handoff's work inline), say plainly that you did, then continue — this pre-check is a discipline gate; only the parity check below (step 5) is the safety gate worth stopping for.
  2. Write the inference contract to .last-ds-mile/package/contract.json: the input schema (column names, dtypes, allowed ranges, known categories — derived from the training data) and the output schema (the prediction, plus probability/uncertainty if the model emits it). This is the frozen interface the service promises.
  3. Write a thin, framework-agnostic predict wrapper to .last-ds-mile/package/predict.py (or the project's language equivalent): a predict(rows) -> preds that loads the pinned artifact and carries no notebook state or globals. It wraps whatever the model is — sklearn, an AutoGluon predictor, a plain function — behind the one contract.
  4. Validate at the boundary. The wrapper rejects or flags rows that violate the contract (out-of-range values, unseen categories) — the serving-time analog of the /ds-data sanitization gate.
  5. Parity gate (the signature check). Run the wrapper over the held/eval rows and assert it reproduces the offline predictions — exact for a deterministic model, or within a documented epsilon for a float path where hardware/library differences apply. If parity fails, stop. A mismatch means a feature is computed differently at serve time than at train time; fix the wrapper (or the feature) before continuing.
  6. Containerize reproducibly. Generate .last-ds-mile/package/Dockerfile that builds the image from the pinned environment + the serialized artifact + the predict wrapper, plus a smoke test that loads the model and scores one row. Build locally and record the resulting image digest — never commit the image binary.
  7. Write .last-ds-mile/stages/11-package.md: the contract summary, the parity result (tolerance used and outcome), the image digest, and the smoke-test result.

Common Rationalizations

See ds-method for the shared Rationalizations that apply to every stage.

RationalizationReality
"The offline predictions are obviously correct — skip the parity check"Parity isn't checking the model, it's checking the serving path. Skew hides in feature recomputation, not the model weights.
"I'll just docker run the notebook, it's the same environment"A notebook isn't a service — no contract, no boundary validation, no proof the loaded artifact scores identically. Package it properly.

Red Flags

See ds-method for the shared Red Flags that apply to every stage.

Red FlagWhat it usually means
Packaged predictions differ from the offline predictions on the same rowsTraining/serving skew — a feature is computed differently at serve time. This is the exact condition the parity gate exists to catch. Do not proceed.
The Dockerfile installs bare package names instead of the pinned versionsThe image won't reproduce; you've reintroduced "works on my machine" at the container layer.
The contract has no allowed ranges or category listsNothing at the boundary can reject bad input, so the first malformed production row becomes a silent wrong answer.

Verification

  • Gate check passed: pinned environment, serialized artifact, and model card all present.
  • .last-ds-mile/package/contract.json written with input and output schemas.
  • Predict wrapper loads the pinned artifact and validates rows against the contract.
  • Parity gate passed — packaged predictions reproduce offline predictions within the stated tolerance.
  • Dockerfile builds from the pinned env + artifact; image digest recorded, binary not committed.
  • .last-ds-mile/stages/11-package.md written.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 627,801. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.