agentsclimarketplace

Cs backend review backend engineering review

Skill srg-sphynx/MDForge/Sources/MDForge/Resources/SkillLibrary/Development/cs-backend-review-backend-engineering-review

Backend engineering review — walks the 7 Matt Pocock forcing questions (read/write ratio + QPS, tenancy, sync vs async, data sensitivity, pattern, RPO/RTO, SLO), picks the language + pattern profile, forks into specialists (api-design-reviewer, database-designer, migration-architect, slo-architect). Invokes the cs-backend-engineer agent with context fork.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add srg-sphynx/MDForge --skill cs-backend-review-backend-engineering-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

3.9 KB, 908 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

/cs:backend-review — Backend engineering review

Use the cs-backend-engineer agent (uses context: fork) to handle this inquiry:

$ARGUMENTS

Forcing-question library

Canonical source: engineering-team/skills/senior-backend/references/forcing_questions.md (7 questions, one-per-turn, recommendation + canon citation per question).

  1. Read/write ratio + one-year p99 QPS
  2. Tenancy model (single / shared / isolated multi-tenant)
  3. Sync request/response vs async (queue) vs event-driven
  4. Data sensitivity tier (public / internal / PII / PHI / PCI)
  5. Monolith / modular monolith / microservices (team-size justification)
  6. RPO and RTO
  7. SLO + named error-budget consumer

Routing protocol

  1. Walk the 7 forcing questions in engineering-team/skills/senior-backend/references/forcing_questions.md. One per turn. Recommend with cited canon. Track in /tmp/backend-grill-<date>.md.
  2. Surface kill criteria — e.g., "microservices, team size 5" trips (Newman's MonolithFirst). STOP and resolve.
  3. Run the deterministic profile picker:
    python engineering-team/skills/senior-backend/scripts/backend_decision_engine.py \
      --team-size <N> --qps-p99 <N> --read-write-ratio <ratio> \
      --tenancy <single-tenant|shared-multi-tenant|isolated-multi-tenant> \
      --data-sensitivity <public|pii|phi|pci> \
      --pattern <monolith|modular-monolith|domain-bounded-services|microservices|serverless> \
      --language-preference <typescript|python|go|rust|java|kotlin|dotnet>
    
  4. Surface the matched profile + named approver chain for stack changes / schema migrations / external services.
  5. Fork into specialists in dependency order:
    • slo-architect FIRST — no SLO, no design
    • api-design-reviewer — API contract
    • database-designer + database-schema-designer — schema + ERD
    • migration-architect — only if changing existing schema
    • observability-designer — golden signals + alerts
    • ci-cd-pipeline-builder — pipeline matching cadence target
    • senior-security + adversarial-reviewer — before public launch
    • ra-qm-team/* — if data sensitivity is PHI / PCI / regulated
    • cs-karpathy-reviewer — before any commit

Output expectations (≤ 200-word digest)

  • Matched profile + reason
  • Three SLO targets (p50, p99 latency + uptime)
  • RPO + RTO
  • Named approver chain (tech-lead + on-call + DBA + ...)
  • List of specialists invoked + artifact paths
  • Recommended next sub-skill

Anti-patterns

  • ❌ Recommending Kafka / event-driven before naming the second team that needs it.
  • ❌ Recommending microservices without team-size ≥ 30 + platform team + bounded-context independence.
  • ❌ Designing the API without forking into api-design-reviewer.
  • ❌ Recommending a DB without QPS + read/write ratio (Q1 unanswered).
  • ❌ Auto-approving a production schema migration. Always name the on-call + DBA.

Customization

Profiles live at engineering-team/skills/senior-backend/profiles/. Four built-in: node-express, fastapi-python, django-monolith, go-or-rust-microservice. Copy one to <your-org>.json and adjust constraints / SLO floor / approver chain.

Related commands

  • /cs:fullstack-review — full-stack lens (parent)
  • /cs:frontend-review — for API consumer side
  • /cs:engineer-grill — cross-role 21-question grill
  • /slo-design — explicit SLO design via slo-architect
  • /karpathy-check — Karpathy 4-principle review

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,750. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.