Earnings deep dive
Skill spacemata/codex-plugins-for-claude-code/plugins/financial-markets/skills/earnings-deep-dive
Unofficial port of openai/role-specific-plugins (Codex plugins) to Claude Code, installable as a plugin marketplace
npx -y skills add spacemata/codex-plugins-for-claude-code --skill earnings-deep-diveAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when analyzing public-company earnings after results, guidance, transcript, or call commentary. Do not use for pre-print previews.
SKILL.md
13.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Earnings Deep Dive
Skill Configuration
User Context Preflight
Before searching connectors, retrieving evidence, or drafting output, run python3 skills/user-context/scripts/user_context_preflight.py with the shell working directory set to this plugin's root, and follow the returned saved_context, source_category_plan, and next_action. Set the working directory before the first attempt; do not probe alternate relative paths. Missing context must not block the requested workflow. Do not initialize state or run onboarding during ordinary workflow work.
If next_action.id = "offer_orientation" and the parent router has not already handled it, complete the requested work first and append its one-line optional setup offer once.
Source Resolution
Load ../../shared/workflow-source-resolution.md. Use source_category_plan lazily and attempt only the categories needed for this workflow: company_filings_ir, earnings_transcripts_presentations, internal_research, portfolio_models_trackers, and market_data_estimates.
Internal Support
When this workflow needs rendering, evidence/data preparation, style, or sector context, route support through the visible public-equity-investing router and its bundled internal playbooks. Route workbook or model QA through the visible model-audit-tieout workflow.
Deliverable Intake
Apply the presentation-surface precedence in ../../shared/deliverable-intake-policy.md. This workflow's natural artifact is a polished standalone HTML post-earnings report. Do not choose chat-only output unless the user explicitly requests a lightweight response.
Before source gathering or analysis for a new standalone reader-facing hero deliverable, load ../../shared/deliverable-intake-policy.md and use its adaptive request_user_input preflight for materially unresolved format, depth, audience/use, or focus choices. For an explicit deep dive, full report, or reusable/source-heavy post-print package, resolve presentation to a polished standalone HTML post-earnings report unless the user requests another format, an explicitly quick/no-file answer, or workbook/model-update output. In interactive runs, ask only remaining material questions such as depth, audience/use, or focus. Reuse resolved preferences in downstream steps; when acting only as input to an owning workflow, do not re-prompt.
Produce a decision-grade, audit-ready post-print package after results are available.
Default to the full post-print package. A new standalone reader-facing post-print output should be a polished standalone HTML post-earnings report following ../../shared/html-artifact-standard.md; use chat only when the user explicitly requests a lightweight response. Use dashboard-builder only for the optional standardized-dashboard route below. Use deterministic file mode only when the user supplies plan.json, normalized CSVs, model-update inputs, or explicitly asks for files.
Route
full deep dive: default analytical route for post-earnings deep dives, earnings-print analysis, and investor-facing post-print questions. An explicit deep dive, full report, or reusable/source-heavy package defaults to polished standalone HTML.one-page tear sheet: use only when the user explicitly asks for a summary, one-pager, quick read, brief, or TL;DR.audit-ready model update: use only when the user supplies or references a model/workbook, driver registry, output registry, normalized CSVs, model-update inputs, or explicit data to update a model.quote and debate map: standalone only when the user asks only for transcript quotes/debate; otherwise include it inside the full deep dive.standardized dashboard: only when the user explicitly asks for a standardized dashboard, reusable dashboard template, PM cockpit, tabbed dashboard, or structured payload-driven render, keep this skill as the analysis owner and hand the resultingpublic_equity_investing_dashboard.v1payload todashboard-builder. Usereferences/DASHBOARD_PACK.mdfor module mapping.deterministic file mode: validate inputs, run shipped scripts, fail QA on unresolved user-facing placeholders, and disclose packet versus workbook-apply path.
Load references/REFERENCE_ROUTER.md first, then only the route-specific reference needed for the selected artifact.
Non-Negotiables
- Never invent numbers, quotes, guidance, definitions, accounting facts, estimate timestamps, source tags, or catalyst dates.
- Use official filings/releases before decks and transcripts; transcripts support narrative and call-only guidance, not primary GAAP numbers.
- Every reported number and every quote needs a source tag; analyst-derived numbers need formula/assumption and confidence.
- Full deep dives must include transcript evidence and a debate-map treatment when transcript evidence is available. If no transcript is available, show a concise visible limitation labelled
transcript not providedortranscript source not foundand list the exact missing artifact; do not render an empty Q&A table. - For transcript Q&A, capture questioner name, firm if available, answering executive, topic, section, source tag, why it matters, bull/bear implication, and falsifier/next check.
- Keep GAAP/non-GAAP, reported/constant-currency, company-guided/analyst-derived, units/scale, and unavailable-data labels explicit.
- Always run an EPS quality screen: ask whether headline EPS could misstate recurring operating performance. Include a full EPS quality / ex-gain bridge when GAAP EPS surprise is distorted by below-the-line, tax, mark-to-market, equity-investment, FX, restructuring, litigation, asset-sale, impairment, share-count, or other non-recurring items; otherwise state that no material EPS-quality trigger was identified from available sources.
- Full deep dives must include quarterly key metrics and growth trajectory using the issuer's actual business drivers, not only generic revenue/EPS/margin. Use sector-context-overlay when the company-specific KPI set is not obvious.
- For HTML reports or standardized dashboard handoffs, include earnings visualizations when source-backed data exists: quarterly revenue, gross profit, net income, and the best source-backed profitability margin history; estimated EPS versus actual EPS for the past five quarters on a consistent basis; and equity-price history annotated with material market events. Omit any chart whose required series is missing, stale, or not comparable, and surface that gap clearly.
- Treat margin selection as an analytical decision, not a template default. Default to net margin only when net income is a fair recurring-profitability proxy. Prefer operating margin when net income is distorted by below-the-line, tax, mark-to-market, equity-investment, FX, restructuring, litigation, asset-sale, impairment, or other non-recurring items. Prefer adjusted operating margin, EBITDA margin, contribution margin, or FCF margin when that is the issuer's source-backed investor KPI. For dashboard payloads, set
financial_trend_chart.data.margin_metric,margin_label, andmargin_rationalewhenever the line is not plain net margin. - Rank highlight/snapshot metrics by investor salience. A growth rate, acceleration, surprise %, guide delta, backlog growth, margin inflection, or clean/normalized metric should be the tile value when it better explains the stock-moving point than the absolute reported amount; put the absolute amount in the detail.
- Full deep dives must include read-throughs when the print, filing, transcript, or management interviews mention customers, suppliers, peers, competitors, platforms, channels, commodities, regions, or adjacent industries.
- Full deep dives must include major news coverage and market events when recent or upcoming events change the interpretation of the print, guidance, estimate revisions, multiple, risk, positioning, or read-throughs. Scan the last quarter, last twelve months, and forward-looking anticipated events; cite every event and label uncertain windows.
- Capture catalysts learned from the release, filing, transcript, Q&A, and management interviews. Separate dated catalysts from inferred monitoring windows.
- Use precise absence labels:
not guided,not disclosed,not provided,source not provided, orMISSING: <dependency>only where appropriate. - Generated Markdown support notes must not contain unresolved bracket tokens,
TODO, or authoring placeholders.
Chat Contract
Default sections for full deep dive: setup/source posture, dense executive summary, PM bottom line, granular beat/miss or guide-versus-bar, EPS quality screen, quarterly key metrics, growth trajectory, guidance delta/deep dive, what changed, revision/stock setup, load-bearing drivers, transcript quote/Q&A and debate map, read-throughs, major news and market events, model/thesis impact, catalysts/watch list/falsifiers, source limitations, and open questions. For investor-facing prompts add thesis change, likely estimate revision, stock/valuation skew, and next catalyst.
Use the evidence pack that supports the selected artifact without shrinking the user-facing analysis:
- Full deep dive: release/filing, deck/prepared remarks, transcript, estimates, and prior-quarter/prior-guide sources where available.
- Explicit summary or one-page tear sheet: release or 8-K, deck if available, estimate source, and transcript only for high-signal quotes.
- Audit-ready model update: release/filing/deck, estimate set, prior guide, and model/workbook or normalized driver inputs supplied or referenced by the user.
- Standalone quote/debate: transcript plus release/deck to cross-check numeric claims.
HTML Guidance
For a substantive HTML deep dive, load ../../shared/html-artifact-standard.md and let the company-specific investment debate determine the layout.
- Title the artifact as a post-earnings deep dive identifying the company, ticker, and reported period.
- Start with a direct verdict answering the investor's question, 4-6 high-signal metric tiles, one compact decision box, and a quality-of-print bridge separating headline results from recurring operating evidence.
- Use only distinct decision-relevant tiles. Prefer 4-5 tiles when additional metrics repeat the same analytical point; combine related buyback, leverage, interest-expense, or cash-flow signals into one capital-allocation-quality tile when that improves readability.
- Put supporting analysis below that first read: beat/miss and guidance, EPS quality, company-specific growth drivers, capital allocation, valuation/stock setup, catalysts, falsifiers, source limitations, and evidence ledger as relevant.
- Give each first-read element a distinct job: the verdict answers the investment question and explains why; the decision box states thesis change, estimate direction, valuation/stock skew, action discipline, and next proof point; metric tiles show evidence rather than restating the verdict; the quality-of-print bridge reconciles headline results to recurring equity value. Do not repeat the same conclusion across these elements.
- Describe evidence posture in reader-facing terms by naming sources obtained and important confirmations still missing, for example
Company release reviewed; filing and transcript confirmation pending. Avoid internal-sounding quality labels such asresearch-gradein the visible artifact. - Include transcript Q&A, read-throughs, market-events tables, scenario sections, and charts only when substantive and evidence-supported. A missing transcript should be a concise limitation callout, not an empty table.
- Do not render blank scenario cards, placeholder modules, or visible source cells marked unsourced when the claim has a cited source.
Sub-agent decomposition
For complex medium/large requests, use sub-agents where available; otherwise emulate the split as named workstreams. Suggested lanes: release and filing numbers, transcript/Q&A, estimates and guidance, model/thesis impact, and source QA. Keep this skill as the lead: reconcile conflicts, source labels, assumptions, open items, final QA, and the user-facing answer.
Deterministic Contract
Use only when requested or file/model inputs are supplied:
scripts/validate_plan.pyscripts/validate_normalized_inputs.pyscripts/run_plan.pyscripts/apply_model_updates.pyscripts/model_diff.pyscripts/verify_tearsheet.py
If workbook apply fails or is unsafe, deliver a driver update packet and explain the limitation. The bundled plan defaults to packet/dry-run mode and writes outside the skill tree.
Standardized Dashboard Handoff
Use dashboard-builder only when the user explicitly selects the standardized dashboard, reusable dashboard-template, or structured payload-driven rendering path. This skill still owns the analysis and maps it into references/DASHBOARD_PACK.md; prefer layout: "single_page" with sticky contents for full PM diligence dashboards unless the user explicitly asks for tabs. Ordinary standalone HTML deep dives use the flexible HTML guidance above rather than a fixed module inventory.
Public Equity PM Judgment Layer
For substantial post-print work, load shared/pm-judgment-heuristics.md before finalizing. Audience modes: long_only_pm, long_short_hf, sell_side_research, etf_index_diligence, public_equity_diligence.
Default PM question: did the quarter change the thesis, estimates, valuation support, or sizing?
Required PM judgment:
- Lead with thesis change, estimate revision direction, valuation support, and position action.
- Bridge headline versus clean result, guide delta, quality of beat/miss, transcript evidence, management credibility, and next falsifier.
- Separate reported facts, management claims, consensus, market data, model output, assumptions, and PM judgment.
- For sell-side mode, add rating/target implications and risk-to-rating. For hedge fund mode, add add/trim/cover triggers.