Skill radar
Skill soarsky1991/skill-radar
Use when the user wants to scan GitHub for AI agent skills, MCP servers, prompt systems, context engineering tools, or agent-native CLI opportunities; generate daily opportunity reports; choose a two-week open-source project; or turn GitHub trend research into build briefs, fake-door probes, and launch content.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add soarsky1991/skill-radarAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
- runs commandsInstructs the agent to run 3 commands, including `agent-skill-radar run` and 2 more.
SKILL.md
2.3 KB, 464 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Agent Skill Radar
Use this skill to find project opportunities from GitHub evidence instead of brainstorming from scratch.
Workflow
- Run the radar CLI.
- Read the top-scoring repos and issue samples.
- Pick one opportunity with a narrow companion-tool shape.
- Generate a build brief, fake-door probe, README angle, and launch post.
- Save the report under
reports/and keep the data underdata/.
Commands
Run the default daily scan:
agent-skill-radar run
Collect a custom scan:
agent-skill-radar collect \
--query "agent memory coding assistant stars:>100 created:>=2025-01-01" \
--limit-per-query 12 \
--issue-limit 6 \
--out data/custom.json
Render a report:
agent-skill-radar report --input data/custom.json --out reports/custom.md
Interpretation Rules
- Treat
build-nowas a proof-of-concept signal, not permission to build a large product. - Prefer a companion tool, plugin, skill pack, template, benchmark, or CLI wrapper over a fork.
- Avoid topics where the only signal is stars. Look for issue comments, reactions, recurring workarounds, and ecosystem gaps.
- For giant repositories, build around the ecosystem edge: docs, config, migration, compatibility, monitoring, security, or publishing workflows.
- If the same gap appears across 3 or more repos, promote it to a standalone project idea.
Output Template
For each shortlisted idea, write:
Project:
Target user:
Observed demand:
Repo evidence:
Why upstream will not solve it:
Smallest useful artifact:
Distribution wedge:
Two-week scope:
Fake-door question:
Probe Template
Use a neutral validation comment. Do not pitch too early.
I have seen this come up in a few agent-tooling repos. My current workaround is <specific workaround>.
I am considering a small standalone <CLI / skill / MCP server / template> that does <specific job> without requiring upstream changes.
Before building it: would this solve your case, or is the real blocker different?
What ships with it: 163 files
14471.5 KB alongside SKILL.md, 6 of them executable
agent_skill_radar/
- cli.pyruns6.0 KB
- github.pyruns4.7 KB
- __init__.pyruns57 B
- report.pyruns8.7 KB
- scoring.pyruns8.2 KB
config/
- queries.json858 B
data/
- 2026-05-25.json163.9 KB
- 2026-05-26.json166.0 KB
- 2026-05-27.json165.6 KB
- 2026-05-28.json165.7 KB
- 2026-05-29.json165.6 KB
- 2026-05-30.json165.7 KB
- 2026-05-31.json164.4 KB
- 2026-06-01.json166.7 KB
- 2026-06-02.json164.5 KB
- 2026-06-03.json166.4 KB
- 2026-06-04.json164.9 KB
- 2026-06-05.json165.3 KB
- 2026-06-06.json164.3 KB
- 2026-06-07.json166.8 KB
- 2026-06-08.json167.0 KB
- 2026-06-09.json166.2 KB
- 2026-06-10.json168.6 KB
- 2026-06-11.json169.6 KB
- 2026-06-12.json168.1 KB
- 2026-06-13.json169.0 KB
- 2026-06-14.json168.9 KB
- 2026-06-15.json169.0 KB
- 2026-06-16.json170.1 KB
- 2026-06-17.json169.7 KB
- 2026-06-18.json172.0 KB
- 2026-06-19.json171.7 KB
- 2026-06-20.json177.6 KB
- 2026-06-21.json178.3 KB
- 2026-06-22.json177.7 KB
- 2026-06-23.json177.3 KB
- 2026-06-24.json179.2 KB
- 2026-06-25.json178.4 KB
- 2026-06-26.json180.3 KB
- CONTRIBUTING.md1.8 KB
123 more files not listed here. See all 163 in the repository.