Series a readiness
Skill SkillMedev/startup-fundraising/skills/series-a-readiness
From first pitch to closed round — the founder’s fundraising playbook.
npx -y skills add SkillMedev/startup-fundraising --skill series-a-readinessAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Audits whether a seed-stage company clears the Series A bar - benchmark metrics, narrative, team, and data room - and produces a red/yellow/green readiness scorecard with a 90-day gap-closing plan. Use when a founder asks "am I ready for Series A", "what metrics do I need to raise an A", "what goes in a Series A data room", "should I raise now or wait two quarters", or is deciding when to open an A process. Do NOT use for a general pre-pitch hygiene check at any stage - use fundraise-readiness-audit instead - or for choosing which round to raise at all - use fundraising-stage-selector instead.
SKILL.md
7.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Series A Readiness
The Series A bar is repeatability, not just traction. Seed proved someone wants the product; the A proves a scalable, predictable engine. The costly mistake this skill prevents: opening a process one quarter early, before the metrics support the story - that burns the exact investors you want, and word travels, so the only reset is waiting. This skill audits readiness across four pillars, builds the data room, and returns a go / fix-first / wait verdict with the milestones that would flip each red pillar green.
This is the Series-A-specific bar. For a stage-agnostic check of whether any raise will survive first meetings and diligence hygiene, use fundraise-readiness-audit; run that first, then this skill applies the A-specific benchmarks on top.
Operating procedure
Step 1: Gather inputs
Collect before scoring. Label any unreconciled number a guess and reconcile it to the bank or the billing system before it enters the scorecard - investors will.
- ARR (or revenue run-rate) now, 12 months ago, and monthly for the trailing 12 months.
- Net revenue retention, gross margin, CAC payback by channel, burn, and months of runway.
- Cohort retention curves (logo and revenue).
- Revenue by channel and the share coming from founder-led sales.
- Cap table (fully diluted), IP assignment status, prior financing docs.
- Leadership org chart and named gaps.
- Target close date and current pipeline of investor relationships, if any.
Step 2: Score the Metrics pillar against benchmark bands
The A is a metrics conversation. Score against the band for the model:
- SaaS: $1-2M+ ARR; growing 2-3x year-over-year (3x is the strong case, below 2x needs an exceptional efficiency story); net revenue retention above 100%; CAC payback under 18 months; gross margin above 70%.
- Consumer: retention curves that flatten rather than decay to zero, a meaningful organic-growth share, and engagement depth per active user.
Exact thresholds move with the market; the constant is consistent growth plus efficiency across at least two consecutive quarters, not one stellar month. Green: inside the band on growth, NRR, and payback. Yellow: one metric outside the band with a credible trajectory. Red: growth below 2x, NRR below 100%, or payback over 18 months with no improving trend.
Step 3: Score the Narrative pillar
- A clear, contrarian insight (build it with fundraising-narrative).
- Evidence the current wedge is working and a defensible path to the next wedge.
- A category vision that justifies venture-scale returns.
Red if the story is "the same thing but bigger" with no insight, or if the ask does not match the evidence.
Step 4: Score the Team pillar
- Key leadership gaps identified and either filled or covered by a credible, named hiring plan - investors fund the team that scales the engine, not just the founders. Pair with fundraise-team-hiring.
- Demonstrated ability to recruit above your weight (at least one hire the company "shouldn't have gotten").
Red if sales is entirely founder-dependent with no repeatable motion and no plan to build one.
Step 5: Score the Data Room pillar and build the index
A clean, complete data room signals operational maturity and shortens diligence. Index, with an owner per line:
- Financials: historical P&L, balance sheet, monthly model, 18-month forward forecast with stated assumptions.
- Metrics: cohort retention, CAC/LTV by channel and segment, pipeline, the KPI dashboard.
- Cap table: current and fully diluted, including option pool.
- Customers: contracts, churn log, top-account concentration, referenceable accounts.
- Legal: incorporation docs, IP assignments (every founder and contractor), employee agreements, prior financing documents.
- Team: org chart, key hires, comp bands.
Red if the books do not close monthly or a data room would take weeks rather than days to assemble. Pair with data-room-builder for the assembly itself.
Step 6: Check timing, then issue the verdict
- Raise from strength: 6-9 months of runway remaining and an up-and-to-the-right trend when the process opens. Opening with under 6 months of runway reads as desperation and prices accordingly.
- Relationships with target funds should be warming 2-3 quarters before the raise so the process opens warm, not cold.
Verdict rule: any red pillar means fix-first or wait - never "test the market" with a known red. All green or one yellow with trajectory: go.
Worked artifact: filled scorecard
SERIES A READINESS SCORECARD - Acme Data, B2B SaaS
METRICS YELLOW ARR $1.6M (in band); growth 2.4x YoY (in band);
NRR 108% (pass); payback 21 months (RED component -
over 18; improving from 26 two quarters ago)
NARRATIVE GREEN Insight: mid-market teams buy compliance as workflow,
not audit; wedge (SOC 2 automation) at 70% win rate
TEAM YELLOW No VP Sales; founder closes 80% of revenue; two
candidates in final stage - plan credible, unproven
DATA ROOM GREEN Books close by day 8 monthly; index 90% populated
VERDICT: FIX-FIRST. Open in ~1 quarter, gated on:
1. Payback under 18 months for one full quarter (owner: CEO, via
channel mix shift away from paid)
2. VP Sales signed and one non-founder-sourced deal closed (owner: CEO)
3. Remaining data-room items populated (owner: ops lead, 2 weeks)
Deliverable
Produce three artifacts: the readiness scorecard across the four pillars with red/yellow/green ratings and evidence for each rating, a prioritized 90-day gap-closing plan with one owner and one measurable exit criterion per gap, and the complete data-room index with owners per item.
Do NOT
- Do not open a process with a red pillar hoping to fix it mid-raise - investors compare notes, and a burned first impression cannot be re-run.
- Do not score growth on one great month; the bar is consistency across quarters.
- Do not present growth without efficiency - a great top line with ugly payback is the most common Series A pass reason.
- Do not lean on a single acquisition channel that has already saturated; show the second channel working or budgeted.
- Do not let a messy cap table or unsigned IP assignments surface first in diligence; they are cheap to fix now and round-killing later.
Quality bar
- Every metric in the scorecard reconciles to the bank or billing system - no slide-only numbers.
- Each pillar rating cites specific evidence, not vibes.
- The 90-day plan has one owner and one measurable exit criterion per gap.
- The verdict follows the rule: any red means fix-first or wait.
- Runway at intended open date is 6+ months.
Escalation and neighbors
This is fundraising strategy, not legal or investment advice; securities questions and financing documents go to counsel. Route adjacent jobs: general pre-pitch hygiene to fundraise-readiness-audit, choosing the round to fundraising-stage-selector, the story itself to fundraising-narrative, room assembly to data-room-builder, term negotiation once a term sheet lands to term-sheet-negotiation.