Skill author
The section-by-section anatomy standard every paid-quality SKILL.md must meet. Use when drafting or restructuring the BODY of a skill, deciding what sections it needs, or checking a draft against the house standard - "what sections does a skill need", "structure this SKILL.md", "is this skill body complete". Do NOT use for the end-to-end creation process from a raw idea (use skill-creator), grading a finished skill (use skill-auditor), or writing only the description field (use skill-description-writer).From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add SkillMedev/skills --skill skill-authorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
4.6 KB, 910 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Skill Author
The anatomy standard for a skill worth paying for. A free skill is a blog post in frontmatter; a paid skill is an operating procedure that produces a measurably better outcome than the model gives unprompted. Apply this standard while drafting; hand the finished draft to skill-auditor for grading.
Inputs to collect before drafting
Ask for whichever of these the requester has not supplied, and do not draft until you have the first three:
- The job - the single outcome the skill produces, in one sentence.
- The trigger - three or more exact phrases a user would type when they need it.
- The audience - practitioner level and context (a founder pricing a SaaS reads differently than a growth analyst).
- Domain source material - frameworks, thresholds, templates the skill should encode. If none is given, use established practitioner methods and say which you used.
The nine-part anatomy
Every skill body follows this order. Sections 1-4 and 7-9 are mandatory; 5-6 are mandatory wherever the domain allows them.
- Framing paragraph - the outcome and the costly mistake the skill prevents. Two to four sentences, no throat-clearing.
- Operating procedure - numbered steps in dependency order. When order matters, say why ("do the front-end math before LTV, because cash timing kills first").
- Input elicitation - the exact inputs to collect from the user, with defaults, and the instruction to label guesses as guesses.
- Concrete thresholds - the numbers a practitioner actually uses: targets, ranges, red lines ("LTV:CAC at or above 3:1", "conversion under 40 percent means fix the consult first"). If the domain genuinely has no numbers, encode judgment as explicit if/then rules instead.
- Worked artifact - at least one of: a filled-in example with real numbers, a good/bad contrast pair, a copy-paste template with FILL fields, or a self-contained runnable calculator with its expected output shown and explained. Fenced code blocks are correct for calculators and templates.
- Deliverable section - the exact artifact the user walks away with: "Produce a X containing A, B, C."
- Do NOT section - named failure modes with the why ("do not use revenue for LTV; use contribution margin").
- Quality bar - the checks a finished output must pass before it ships.
- Escalation boundary - where relevant: not legal/medical/financial advice, when to bring in a professional, and which neighbor skill handles adjacent jobs (name it by slug).
Length and disclosure
- Advisory skills: 500-1,200 words. Operator skills with calculators and templates: up to ~2,800.
- Under ~300 words a skill cannot clear the anatomy and reads as a stub. Over ~3,000, push reference material into sections titled "references/<topic>" at the bottom - the main body must be self-sufficient for the common case.
- Cross-link neighbor skills by plain slug mention ("pair with gym-meta-ads-funnel"), never wiki-link syntax.
Style rules
- Imperative voice throughout the procedure; third person in the description.
- No dates, versions, "currently", or "latest" - skills must not rot.
- No first person. No filler that restates what the model already knows.
- Frontmatter: exactly two keys, name (Title Case, 64 chars max) and description (WHAT + WHEN + NOT formula - see skill-description-writer).
Do NOT
- Do not ship a body without a worked artifact when the domain allows one; abstraction is what the user already gets for free.
- Do not present two equally weighted options at a decision point. State one default and an explicit escape hatch: "If X, then Y instead."
- Do not pad with encouragement, summaries of the obvious, or restatements of the procedure.
- Do not absorb a neighbor skill's job; route to it by slug in the escalation boundary.
Quality bar
A draft meets the standard when: every mandatory anatomy section is present and load-bearing; a practitioner could execute the procedure without asking a clarifying question; at least one artifact could be copied out and used as-is; and deleting any single section would visibly weaken the output.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.