agentsclimarketplace

R for analysis

Skill SkillMedev/skills/skills/r-for-analysis

The open Skill Me catalog — every hosted skill as a portable, MIT-licensed SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add SkillMedev/skills --skill r-for-analysis

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Writes idiomatic tidyverse R for data analysis - dplyr wrangling pipelines, tidyr reshaping, explicit joins, layered ggplot2 visualization, and broom-tidied statistical models - with reproducibility practices baked in. Use when someone asks "write this analysis in R", "how do I pivot this data frame", "fit a regression per group in R", or wants messy base-R scripts converted to clean pipe-based tidyverse code. Do NOT use for Python-based dataframe work - use pandas-expert instead; for interpreting results for stakeholders use sql-to-insights.

SKILL.md

5.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

R for Analysis

Produce R analysis code that another analyst can re-run a year later and get the same answer. The costly mistake this prevents: interactive one-off scripts with silent type inference, implicit grouping, and unseeded randomness - code that works once on one laptop and never again.

Inputs to collect

Before writing code, establish:

  1. The data source and its shape - file, database, or in-memory; roughly how many rows (millions of rows change the tool choice: consider data.table or duckdb backends past ~10M rows).
  2. The analytical question in one sentence. If the user cannot state it, help them state it first - code without a question produces plots without a point.
  3. The output target - exploratory notebook, Quarto report, or a table/figure for a deck. This decides how much polish the code needs.

Label any assumption about column meanings as a guess and confirm against a glimpse() of the real data.

Operating procedure

Work in this order - each step protects the ones after it.

Step 1: Reproducible setup

library(tidyverse)
library(lubridate)
library(broom)
set.seed(42)  # any stochastic operation must be seeded

Step 2: Read with explicit types

Never trust type inference on data that matters:

sales <- read_csv("sales.csv", col_types = cols(
  date = col_date(),
  amount = col_double(),
  region = col_character()
))

Immediately glimpse(sales) and check row count against expectation. Standardize names with janitor::clean_names().

Step 3: Validate before analyzing

Encode assumptions as executable checks, not comments:

stopifnot(
  nrow(sales) > 0,
  !any(is.na(sales$date)),
  all(sales$amount >= 0 | is.na(sales$amount))
)

A check that fails loudly today beats a wrong number in a deck next week.

Step 4: Wrangle with one-verb-per-line pipelines

summary_tbl <- sales %>%
  filter(amount > 0) %>%
  mutate(month = floor_date(date, "month")) %>%
  group_by(region, month) %>%
  summarise(total = sum(amount), n = n(), .groups = "drop") %>%
  arrange(region, month)

Rules that prevent the classic silent errors:

  • Always pass .groups = "drop" to summarise() - silently grouped output corrupts every downstream step.
  • Joins take an explicit by; check nrow() before and after every join for unexpected row multiplication.
  • Prefer case_when() over nested ifelse(); keep raw data immutable and create new objects per transformation stage.

Step 5: Reshape only at the boundary

Keep data long for analysis; pivot wide only for presentation:

wide <- summary_tbl %>% pivot_wider(names_from = region, values_from = total)

Step 6: Visualize in layers

ggplot(summary_tbl, aes(month, total, color = region)) +
  geom_line(linewidth = 1) +
  scale_y_continuous(labels = scales::comma) +
  labs(title = "Monthly sales by region", x = NULL, y = "Total") +
  theme_minimal()

Map variables inside aes(), set constants outside it. Every axis gets human-readable labels and formatted scales before anyone else sees the plot.

Step 7: Model and tidy the output

model <- lm(total ~ month + region, data = summary_tbl)
tidy(model, conf.int = TRUE)
glance(model)

For group-wise models, nest and map rather than looping:

models <- sales %>%
  group_by(region) %>%
  nest() %>%
  mutate(fit = map(data, ~ lm(amount ~ date, data = .x)),
         tidied = map(fit, tidy)) %>%
  unnest(tidied)

Report coefficients with confidence intervals, never bare point estimates. Say "associated with", not "causes", unless the design supports causal claims - route causal questions to causal-inference.

Step 8: Package for reproduction

Deliver as a Quarto or R Markdown document that runs top to bottom in a fresh session. If it only runs after manual steps, it is not done.

Good / bad

Bad: df2 <- df[df$amt > 0 & !is.na(df$amt),]; agg <- aggregate(amt ~ reg, df2, sum) - base-R index gymnastics, no types checked, unreadable in review.

Good: the Step 4 pipeline - each verb does one thing, grouping is explicit and dropped, and the intent reads top to bottom.

Deliverable

Produce a runnable script or Quarto document containing: seeded setup, typed data import, stopifnot() validation block, pipelined transformations, labeled publication-ready plots, tidied model output with confidence intervals, and a one-paragraph plain-language answer to the analytical question.

Do NOT

  • Do not rely on read_csv() type inference for anything that feeds a decision - a column silently read as character has ruined many aggregates.
  • Do not leave summarise() output grouped; .groups = "drop" every time.
  • Do not join without checking row counts - a many-to-many join inflates sums silently.
  • Do not report model point estimates without intervals, or imply causation from observational fits.
  • Do not mix analysis and presentation shapes - keep data long until the final table.

Quality bar

The analysis ships only when: it runs top to bottom in a fresh R session with no manual steps; every stochastic step is seeded; every assumption about the data is a stopifnot() check; every plot has labeled axes and formatted scales; and the answer to the original question appears in plain language, not just in a table.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.