Partnership strategy
Identifies, prioritizes, and structures business partnerships that produce measurable revenue - matching partnership type to goal, setting economics with real rev-share ranges, and enforcing a pilot-before-contract rule. Use when someone asks "should we partner with X", "how do we structure a reseller deal", "what rev share is normal", "our partnerships never produce anything", or "which partners should we prioritize". Do NOT use for choosing between partnerships and other distribution channels - use channel-strategy instead - or for the overall market-entry plan a partnership sits inside - use go-to-market-planner instead.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add SkillMedev/skills --skill partnership-strategyAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
7.2 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Partnership Strategy
Most partnerships are press releases that produce nothing: signed with fanfare, staffed by nobody, dead within two quarters. A real partnership creates measurable value for both sides and has a named owner accountable for a number. This skill separates strategic partnerships from logo-swap theater and structures the deal so the partner's people are actually incentivized to sell.
Operating procedure
Fit-test before structuring, pilot before contract - in that order, because a well-structured deal with a bad-fit partner still produces nothing, and a deep contract before a proven motion locks in the failure.
Step 1: Gather inputs
- The goal - awareness, reach into a locked market, product stickiness, or a new revenue line. One primary goal; a partnership chasing three goals achieves none.
- Candidate partners, if any exist, with what is known about their customer base.
- Your ACV, margin, and sales motion - these bound what economics you can offer.
- Capacity - who on your side would own this, at what fraction of their time. If the answer is nobody, stop here.
Step 2: Match the partnership type to the goal
- Co-marketing (shared content, events, audiences): low commitment, fast, modest upside. For awareness.
- Technology / integration: your product connects to theirs, increasing stickiness and reach. Often the highest ROI for software. For retention and product depth.
- Distribution / channel (they sell or resell you): high ceiling, slow to build, needs enablement. For reach into a locked market.
- OEM / embed (white-labeled into their product): deep and durable, but you cede the customer relationship. Price for that loss.
Step 3: Run the strategic fit test
All four must pass before any deal talk:
- Shared customer, non-competing product - same buyer, no cannibalization.
- Mutual value - both sides get something they cannot easily build alone. One-sided partnerships die quietly.
- Strategic, not opportunistic - it advances your distribution or product strategy, not just a logo for the website.
- Capacity to execute - both sides can actually staff it. An unstaffed partnership is a press release.
Step 4: Structure the economics
Define the value exchange concretely - who provides what, who gets what - and put money where you want motion. Practitioner ranges:
- Referral fees: 10-20% of first-year contract value for a warm intro that closes; one-time.
- Reseller / channel margin: 20-40% off list, scaling with how much of the sale (demo, close, first-line support) the partner owns. Under 20%, their reps will not bother; the deal fails economically before it fails operationally.
- Co-sell splits: full quota credit or retirement for the partner's rep on sourced deals - split commissions kill co-sell motions.
- OEM / embed: per-unit or revenue-based royalty, floor-protected; you are trading margin for distribution and losing the customer relationship, so price durability in.
Agree success metrics up front - sourced leads, sourced revenue, integration adoption - with a review cadence.
Step 5: Pilot before contract
The pilot-before-contract rule: never sign a multi-year or exclusive agreement before a lightweight pilot proves the motion. Default pilot: 90 days, one segment or region, a simple letter agreement, and a numeric success bar set in advance (e.g., 10 sourced qualified opportunities or 2 closed deals). If the pilot misses the bar, renegotiate or walk - do not sign the big contract hoping scale fixes what the pilot exposed. Exclusivity is only ever traded for a committed, contractual number.
Step 6: Build the operating motion
Partnerships fail from the lack of an operating motion far more often than from the contract:
- Name one owner on each side accountable for the number.
- Enable the partner's team: training, collateral, a clear pitch. An untrained partner sales force sells nothing.
- Stand up a biweekly sync and a shared pipeline view.
- Reduce friction relentlessly: the lower the effort for their reps, the more they sell.
Step 7: Prioritize the portfolio
Score every candidate on reach × fit × ease of execution (1-5 each) and concentrate on the top two or three. One deep partnership beats ten shallow MOUs.
Worked artifact: deal one-pager template
PARTNERSHIP ONE-PAGER - [FILL: partner] x [FILL: your company]
Goal (one): [FILL: awareness / locked-market reach / stickiness / revenue line]
Type: [FILL: co-marketing / integration / distribution / OEM]
Fit test: shared buyer [Y/N] mutual value [Y/N] strategic [Y/N] staffed [Y/N]
Value exchange: we provide [FILL]; they provide [FILL]
Economics: [FILL: e.g., 15% referral fee first-year ACV / 30% reseller margin]
Pilot (90 days): scope [FILL: segment/region]; success bar [FILL: numeric];
decision date [FILL]
Owners: us [FILL name, % time]; them [FILL name]
Metrics + cadence: [FILL: sourced pipeline $, sourced revenue $]; biweekly sync
Kill criteria: pilot misses bar by >50%, or no partner-sourced activity in 60 days
Deliverable
Produce a partnership plan: target partners scored on reach/fit/ease, the recommended type per target matched to the stated goal, a deal structure with concrete value exchange and economics inside the practitioner ranges, a 90-day pilot design with a numeric success bar, and the operating motion with named owners, enablement plan, and review cadence.
Do NOT
- Do not sign for the press release with no operating plan - announcement-only partnerships damage credibility with the partner's team for the real attempt later.
- Do not structure a channel deal under 20% margin and expect motion; the partner's reps optimize their own commission math.
- Do not grant exclusivity without a committed contractual number in return.
- Do not skip the pilot because the partner is big; big partners are the slowest to produce and the costliest to unwind.
- Do not pursue a logo whose customers are not your buyers - reach without fit is zero.
- Do not leave the partnership ownerless after signing; nobody's job means nothing happens.
Quality bar
- Each target passes all four fit-test gates explicitly, or is cut with the failed gate named.
- Economics fall inside the stated ranges or the deviation is justified in writing.
- Every deal has a 90-day pilot with a numeric bar and a decision date before any long-term contract.
- One named owner per side, with time allocation, appears in the plan.
- Kill criteria exist for every partnership, not just success metrics.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.