agentsclimarketplace

Partnership strategy

Skill SkillMedev/skills/skills/partnership-strategy

The open Skill Me catalog — every hosted skill as a portable, MIT-licensed SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add SkillMedev/skills --skill partnership-strategy

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Identifies, prioritizes, and structures business partnerships that produce measurable revenue - matching partnership type to goal, setting economics with real rev-share ranges, and enforcing a pilot-before-contract rule. Use when someone asks "should we partner with X", "how do we structure a reseller deal", "what rev share is normal", "our partnerships never produce anything", or "which partners should we prioritize". Do NOT use for choosing between partnerships and other distribution channels - use channel-strategy instead - or for the overall market-entry plan a partnership sits inside - use go-to-market-planner instead.

SKILL.md

7.2 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Partnership Strategy

Most partnerships are press releases that produce nothing: signed with fanfare, staffed by nobody, dead within two quarters. A real partnership creates measurable value for both sides and has a named owner accountable for a number. This skill separates strategic partnerships from logo-swap theater and structures the deal so the partner's people are actually incentivized to sell.

Operating procedure

Fit-test before structuring, pilot before contract - in that order, because a well-structured deal with a bad-fit partner still produces nothing, and a deep contract before a proven motion locks in the failure.

Step 1: Gather inputs

  1. The goal - awareness, reach into a locked market, product stickiness, or a new revenue line. One primary goal; a partnership chasing three goals achieves none.
  2. Candidate partners, if any exist, with what is known about their customer base.
  3. Your ACV, margin, and sales motion - these bound what economics you can offer.
  4. Capacity - who on your side would own this, at what fraction of their time. If the answer is nobody, stop here.

Step 2: Match the partnership type to the goal

  • Co-marketing (shared content, events, audiences): low commitment, fast, modest upside. For awareness.
  • Technology / integration: your product connects to theirs, increasing stickiness and reach. Often the highest ROI for software. For retention and product depth.
  • Distribution / channel (they sell or resell you): high ceiling, slow to build, needs enablement. For reach into a locked market.
  • OEM / embed (white-labeled into their product): deep and durable, but you cede the customer relationship. Price for that loss.

Step 3: Run the strategic fit test

All four must pass before any deal talk:

  1. Shared customer, non-competing product - same buyer, no cannibalization.
  2. Mutual value - both sides get something they cannot easily build alone. One-sided partnerships die quietly.
  3. Strategic, not opportunistic - it advances your distribution or product strategy, not just a logo for the website.
  4. Capacity to execute - both sides can actually staff it. An unstaffed partnership is a press release.

Step 4: Structure the economics

Define the value exchange concretely - who provides what, who gets what - and put money where you want motion. Practitioner ranges:

  • Referral fees: 10-20% of first-year contract value for a warm intro that closes; one-time.
  • Reseller / channel margin: 20-40% off list, scaling with how much of the sale (demo, close, first-line support) the partner owns. Under 20%, their reps will not bother; the deal fails economically before it fails operationally.
  • Co-sell splits: full quota credit or retirement for the partner's rep on sourced deals - split commissions kill co-sell motions.
  • OEM / embed: per-unit or revenue-based royalty, floor-protected; you are trading margin for distribution and losing the customer relationship, so price durability in.

Agree success metrics up front - sourced leads, sourced revenue, integration adoption - with a review cadence.

Step 5: Pilot before contract

The pilot-before-contract rule: never sign a multi-year or exclusive agreement before a lightweight pilot proves the motion. Default pilot: 90 days, one segment or region, a simple letter agreement, and a numeric success bar set in advance (e.g., 10 sourced qualified opportunities or 2 closed deals). If the pilot misses the bar, renegotiate or walk - do not sign the big contract hoping scale fixes what the pilot exposed. Exclusivity is only ever traded for a committed, contractual number.

Step 6: Build the operating motion

Partnerships fail from the lack of an operating motion far more often than from the contract:

  • Name one owner on each side accountable for the number.
  • Enable the partner's team: training, collateral, a clear pitch. An untrained partner sales force sells nothing.
  • Stand up a biweekly sync and a shared pipeline view.
  • Reduce friction relentlessly: the lower the effort for their reps, the more they sell.

Step 7: Prioritize the portfolio

Score every candidate on reach × fit × ease of execution (1-5 each) and concentrate on the top two or three. One deep partnership beats ten shallow MOUs.

Worked artifact: deal one-pager template

PARTNERSHIP ONE-PAGER - [FILL: partner] x [FILL: your company]
Goal (one):            [FILL: awareness / locked-market reach / stickiness / revenue line]
Type:                  [FILL: co-marketing / integration / distribution / OEM]
Fit test:              shared buyer [Y/N]  mutual value [Y/N]  strategic [Y/N]  staffed [Y/N]
Value exchange:        we provide [FILL]; they provide [FILL]
Economics:             [FILL: e.g., 15% referral fee first-year ACV / 30% reseller margin]
Pilot (90 days):       scope [FILL: segment/region]; success bar [FILL: numeric];
                       decision date [FILL]
Owners:                us [FILL name, % time]; them [FILL name]
Metrics + cadence:     [FILL: sourced pipeline $, sourced revenue $]; biweekly sync
Kill criteria:         pilot misses bar by >50%, or no partner-sourced activity in 60 days

Deliverable

Produce a partnership plan: target partners scored on reach/fit/ease, the recommended type per target matched to the stated goal, a deal structure with concrete value exchange and economics inside the practitioner ranges, a 90-day pilot design with a numeric success bar, and the operating motion with named owners, enablement plan, and review cadence.

Do NOT

  • Do not sign for the press release with no operating plan - announcement-only partnerships damage credibility with the partner's team for the real attempt later.
  • Do not structure a channel deal under 20% margin and expect motion; the partner's reps optimize their own commission math.
  • Do not grant exclusivity without a committed contractual number in return.
  • Do not skip the pilot because the partner is big; big partners are the slowest to produce and the costliest to unwind.
  • Do not pursue a logo whose customers are not your buyers - reach without fit is zero.
  • Do not leave the partnership ownerless after signing; nobody's job means nothing happens.

Quality bar

  • Each target passes all four fit-test gates explicitly, or is cut with the failed gate named.
  • Economics fall inside the stated ranges or the deviation is justified in writing.
  • Every deal has a 90-day pilot with a numeric bar and a decision date before any long-term contract.
  • One named owner per side, with time allocation, appears in the plan.
  • Kill criteria exist for every partnership, not just success metrics.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.