Sev triage
Skill SkillMedev/incident-response-command/skills/sev-triage
SRE skills for triage, runbooks, alerting, and SLO-driven reliability ops
npx -y skills add SkillMedev/incident-response-command --skill sev-triageAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Classifies incident severity (SEV1-4) using impact, scope, and urgency signals and decides who to page. Use when an alert fires or a report comes in and a severity call must be made quickly.
SKILL.md
4.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
SEV Triage
Severity is a paging decision, not a feelings meter. Assign the highest SEV that any single signal justifies, then downgrade only with evidence.
Severity Definitions
- SEV1 - Revenue-impacting or total service loss. More than 5% of users cannot complete a critical flow. Data loss or breach possible. Page IC + engineering lead + exec on-call immediately.
- SEV2 - Significant degradation. Core feature broken for a subset, elevated error rate above SLO breach threshold, or a workaround exists but is unacceptable long-term. Page IC + team on-call within 5 minutes.
- SEV3 - Partial or minor degradation. Non-critical feature affected, SLO still within budget, no customer escalations yet. Ticket created, team notified async, fix before next business day.
- SEV4 - Cosmetic or edge case. No user impact, caught proactively. Ticket only.
Signal Checklist
Answer these to land on a SEV. First 'yes' that matches wins.
- Is a payment, auth, or data-integrity flow broken for any user? -> SEV1 candidate.
- Is error rate above your SLO threshold for the last 10 minutes? -> SEV2 at minimum.
- Are multiple regions or availability zones affected? -> Escalate one level.
- Is there active data exfiltration or corruption risk? -> SEV1 regardless of user count.
- Is a single non-critical endpoint slow but the rest healthy? -> SEV3.
Scope Multipliers
- Blast radius: estimate percentage of users affected. Below 1% rarely justifies SEV1 unless the 1% are paying customers or the data risk is severe.
- Growth rate: is impact spreading? A SEV3 that doubles every 10 minutes is a SEV2.
- Detection lag: if the issue started more than 30 minutes ago undetected, assume blast radius is larger than current signals show.
Who to Page
- SEV1: IC (incident commander), service owner, on-call SRE, and engineering lead. Open a war room immediately.
- SEV2: IC and service owner on-call. Invite others as needed.
- SEV3: Service team on-call async. No war room.
- SEV4: Ticket, no page.
Worked example: making the call
Bad: "Checkout seems broken for some users. Feels like a SEV3 - I'll dig into the cause first and page someone if it turns out to be serious."
Good: "Checkout error rate at 12% for the last 15 minutes (SLO threshold: 1%). Payment flow broken -> signal 1 -> SEV1. Paged IC, service owner, and on-call SRE at 14:32; war room open. Blast radius estimate: ~12% of checkout attempts, growth unclear. Cause unknown - irrelevant to the SEV. Re-triage at 15:00."
The bad version inverts the order (cause before severity), hedges on a broken payment flow, and delays paging. The good version cites the signal that set the level, pages immediately, records blast radius, and schedules the re-triage - all before anyone knows why it broke.
Deliverable
Produce a triage record - posted to the incident channel or ticket - containing: the assigned SEV, a one-line justification naming the checklist signal that set it, the blast radius estimate (percentage of users or requests), who was paged and when, and the scheduled re-triage time. The record is what lets the next responder trust the level instead of re-deriving it.
Quality bar
- The SEV was assigned from impact signals before any root-cause investigation began.
- The justification names a specific checklist signal, not a gut feel.
- Paging happened on assignment, not after confirmation - a potential SEV1 pages on one data point.
- A re-triage time is set (every 30 minutes) and the level moves with the evidence, both up and down.
Do / Don't
- Do: assign SEV before investigating root cause. Severity is about impact now, not cause.
- Do: re-triage every 30 minutes. A SEV2 resolved is a SEV4; a SEV3 spreading is a SEV1.
- Don't: under-SEV to avoid waking people. False SEV1s are cheaper than missed ones.
- Don't: wait for a second data point before paging on a potential SEV1.