agentsclimarketplace

Cco review

Skill sinhoneyy/master-skills/skills/cco-review

/cs:cco-review <plan> — Retention-obsessed Chief Customer Officer interrogation of any plan that touches customer retention, segmentation, CS team sizing, or CS team hiring. Use when gross retention is slipping, before approving CSM headcount, or when deciding which customer segments to keep or fire.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add sinhoneyy/master-skills --skill cco-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 10 stars10 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.1 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

/cs:cco-review — CCO Forcing Questions

Command: /cs:cco-review <plan>

The retention-obsessed CCO pressure-tests any plan that touches customer experience. Six questions before any retention claim, segmentation change, CS team expansion, or major CS hire.

When to Run

  • Before any board narrative that includes a retention number
  • Before approving a CS team headcount expansion
  • Before re-segmenting the customer base or changing tier definitions
  • Before launching a customer marketing or advocacy program
  • Before a major CS hire (CSM, AM, Implementation, Customer Marketing)
  • When NRR is "great" but churn complaints from CSMs are increasing
  • Before deciding whether to add an AM role separate from CSM

The Six CCO Questions

1. What's the GROSS retention rate?

Not NRR. Gross. NRR can hide a leaky bucket behind expansion.

  • GRR healthy ≥ 90% at growth stage, ≥ 95% at scale
  • If GRR < 85% but NRR > 100%, the product is failing for 15%+ of customers; expansion is masking the failure
  • Run retention_decomposition_analyzer.py

2. What's the #1 reason customers leave?

If you can't name it, you don't understand churn.

  • 7-category taxonomy: product_fit / competitor_loss / no_value_realized / pricing / champion_left / company_event / tactical_failure
  • Preventable churn = product_fit + no_value_realized + tactical_failure
  • If preventable > 50%, CS has clear leverage; if < 30%, churn is structural (ICP, market, competition)

3. What's the median time-to-value (TTV) by segment?

Long TTV signals different problems by segment.

  • Long TTV in low tier = ICP misfit; downgrade or kill
  • Long TTV in high tier = onboarding broken; fix the Implementation Manager handoff
  • TTV is a leading indicator of GRR

4. Which customer would you fire today?

If "none" — your segmentation is broken.

  • Some accounts cost more than they earn (support cost > 50% of ARR + low ICP fit)
  • Run customer_segmentation_designer.py to surface kill list
  • The 3 paths for kill candidates: non-renewal / downgrade-to-tech-touch / raise-price-to-cost-recover

5. What's the ARR-per-CSM ratio, and is the model pooled or named?

Wrong model wastes capacity.

  • Strategic: named + exec sponsor, $300K-$1M ARR/CSM
  • Enterprise: named, $500K-$2M
  • Mid-market: pooled, $2M-$5M
  • SMB: tech-touch, $5M+
  • Run cs_coverage_calculator.py to size the team

6. Is CS in your comp plan, and how is it different from Sales comp?

Misalignment is the leading indicator of CS failure.

  • CS comp: 70/30 base/variable typical
  • Variable: 50% gross retention + 30% net retention + 20% activity
  • Anti-pattern: comp CSMs on NPS — they game it
  • Anti-pattern: comp CSMs same as Sales — they sell instead of serve

Workflow

# 1. Retention decomposition (always start here)
python ../../../skills/chief-customer-officer-advisor/scripts/retention_decomposition_analyzer.py cohorts.json

# 2. Segmentation audit
python ../../../skills/chief-customer-officer-advisor/scripts/customer_segmentation_designer.py customers.json

# 3. Coverage sizing (if making CS team changes)
python ../../../skills/chief-customer-officer-advisor/scripts/cs_coverage_calculator.py book.json

Output Format

# CCO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

## The Decision Being Made
[one sentence — retention | segmentation | coverage | next hire]

## Retention (if applicable)
- GRR: X% (vs vanity NRR of Y%)
- Top churn driver: <category> at X% of churn
- Preventable churn: X% (CS-controllable)
- Leaky-bucket pattern? yes/no

## Segmentation (if applicable)
- Tier distribution: Strategic X / Enterprise X / Mid-market X / SMB X
- Kill list size: N customers (X% of customers, Y% of ARR)
- Upgrade candidates: N

## Coverage (if applicable)
- Current CSMs: N | Required now: M | Required 12mo: P
- Annual cost (12mo): $X
- Manager trigger fired: yes/no

## Org (if applicable)
- Next hire: <CSM | Support | AM | IM | CS Ops | Customer Marketing>
- Why this, not the alternative: <one line>
- Customer outcome unblocked: <specific>

## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK

## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]

Routing

  • /cs:cpo-review — if churn root cause is product_fit or no_value_realized
  • /cs:cro-review — if expansion math or comp alignment is in question
  • /cs:cfo-review — for CS cost commitments and retention-impact-on-revenue
  • cs-chro-advisor agent — for CS hires, comp, ladder
  • /cs:decide — log the verdict
  • /cs:freeze 30 — on multi-year CS comp plan changes

Related


Version: 1.0.0

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most review quality skills give in ~1.3k tokens

Counted across 1,048 of the 1,783 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Ask questions one at a timein 81 of 1048, across 64 files
  • Provide a recommended answer for each questionin 73 of 1048, across 50 files
  • Explore the codebase instead of asking answerable questionsin 66 of 1048, across 42 files
  • Resolve dependencies between decisions one-by-onein 42 of 1048, across 17 files
  • Interview the user relentlessly about the planin 38 of 1048, across 13 files
  • Order findings by severityin 31 of 1048
  • Resolve each branch of the decision treein 27 of 1048, across 5 files
  • Run a grilling sessionin 26 of 1048, across 5 files
  • Update CONTEXT.md immediately when a term is resolvedin 26 of 1048, across 11 files
  • Propose precise canonical terms for vague languagein 25 of 1048, across 7 files
  • Create documentation files lazilyin 24 of 1048, across 5 files
  • Assign severity to every findingin 24 of 1048

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,696. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.