agentsclimarketplace

Launch plan

Skill Sidsaladi9/persona-os/plugins/product-manager-os/skills/launch-plan

Builds a go-to-market launch plan for a feature or product, scaled to a launch tier. Use when someone asks to "plan the launch", build a "go-to-market plan" or "GTM for the new feature", needs a "launch checklist for X", or asks "how should we launch this". Produces audience, messaging, channels, a pre/launch/post timeline with owners, assets, success metrics, and a launch-day runbook.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add Sidsaladi9/persona-os --skill launch-plan

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

7.4 KB, ~1.8k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Launch Plan

A launch is a cross-functional event, not a ship date. This skill turns "we're shipping X" into a coordinated plan: the right tier of effort, a clear message, the channels that fit, a timeline with owners, the assets you need, the metrics that define success, and a runbook for launch day. Scale everything to impact — not every launch deserves a press release.

Grounded in: Crossing the Chasm — Geoffrey Moore: tier the launch and target the segment that cares most. Go deeper (The Product Channel): The Beginner's Guide to a Product Launch

When to use this

  • A feature or product is about to ship and needs a coordinated rollout
  • Marketing, sales, support, and eng need a single source of truth for who does what, when
  • You need a launch checklist with owners and dates, not just a vibe
  • You want to right-size effort: avoid over-launching a minor change or under-launching a flagship

Pick the launch tier first

Decide impact before anything else — it sets the ceiling for every section below.

  • T1 (major) — new product, flagship feature, repositioning. Full GTM: all channels, exec involvement, sales enablement, press/analyst, coordinated timeline, dry run.
  • T2 (standard) — notable feature, meaningful expansion. Targeted comms on key channels (blog, email, in-app, social), light sales/support enablement, single owner per task.
  • T3 (minor) — incremental improvement, fast-follow, fix. Changelog entry + in-app note + maybe one social post. No campaign.

Boundary heuristic (apply top-down, first match wins): new product / repositioning / press-worthy → T1; touches a core surface OR moves a top company metric → at least T2; no new user behavior, only a fix or polish → T3.

Scale audience, channels, timeline, assets, and metrics to the tier. When unsure, default down a tier — you can always amplify a winner.

Before you start (gather these)

  • What's launching + why it matters — the one-line value to the user
  • Target audience / segment — who this is for (all users? a plan tier? a persona?)
  • The date — hard date or target window, and what's gating it
  • Cross-functional partners — named owners in PM, marketing, sales, support, eng
  • Success metric — the one number that says this worked Ask for anything missing before drafting — don't invent a date, an owner, or a metric.

Process

  1. Set the tier. Classify T1/T2/T3 by impact and state why. This caps scope.
  2. Define audience + core message + proof. Who it's for, the single core message (problem → what changed → why they should care), and the proof (data, demo, customer quote, before/after).
  3. Choose channels. Pick only channels that fit the tier and reach the audience: changelog, in-app, email, blog, social, docs, sales deck, webinar, press/analyst, community. Don't default to "all."
  4. Build the timeline (pre / launch / post) with a checklist and owners. Every task gets an owner and a date. Pre-launch: enablement, assets, QA, staged rollout. Launch day: flip the switch, publish, monitor. Post-launch: follow-up comms, metric review, retro.
  5. List assets needed. Each asset (copy, screenshots, demo, FAQ, sales one-pager, support macros) gets an owner and a due date that lands before launch day.
  6. Set success metrics + a rollback/abort trigger. Define the target number, the window to hit it, and the explicit condition under which you pause, roll back, or abort.
  7. Write a launch-day runbook. Hour-by-hour (or step-by-step) sequence: who flips what, in what order, who's watching which dashboard, who comms internally, and the go/no-go checkpoint.

Output template

Copy-paste and fill in.

# Launch Plan: <name>

## Launch summary
- What: <one line on what's shipping>
- Why it matters: <value to the user>
- Tier: <T1 / T2 / T3> — <one line on why>
- Why this tier (evidence): <which boundary rule it hit + the fact behind it — e.g. "moves activation, a top metric" — not a hand-wave>
- Date: <date or window>

## Audience & message
- Audience / segment: <who>
- Core message: <problem → what changed → why they care>
- Proof: <data / demo / quote / before-after>

## Channels
- <channel> — <what goes out, owner>
- <channel> — <what goes out, owner>
- Not doing (and why): <channels deliberately reserved for a higher tier — e.g. "no press/analyst, this is T2">


## Timeline & checklist
### Pre-launch
| Task | Owner | When | Status |
|------|-------|------|--------|
| <task> | <name> | <date> | <todo/doing/done> |

### Launch day
| Task | Owner | When | Status |
|------|-------|------|--------|
| <task> | <name> | <time> | <todo/doing/done> |

### Post-launch
| Task | Owner | When | Status |
|------|-------|------|--------|
| <task> | <name> | <date> | <todo/doing/done> |

## Assets needed
| Asset | Owner | Due |
|-------|-------|-----|
| <asset> | <name> | <date> |

## Success metrics
- Primary: <metric> — target <number> by <date>
- Secondary: <metric(s)>
- What failure looks like: <the number/signal that means it flopped — define the abort thresholds HERE, once; the rollback trigger below references them>

## Launch-day runbook
> The "Launch day" table above is the checklist (what must happen); this runbook is the executable, cold-at-6am sequence derived from it (the exact order, who flips what, who watches what). For T3 — and optionally T2 — the runbook replaces the launch-day table; don't maintain both.

1. <time> — <who> does <what> (go/no-go checkpoint: <condition>)
2. <time> — <who> publishes <channel>
3. <time> — <who> monitors <dashboard/metric>
4. Internal comms: <who> posts in <channel> when <milestone>

## Risks & rollback trigger
- Risk: <risk> → Mitigation: <plan>
- Rollback / abort trigger: if the failure threshold above ("What failure looks like") is hit by <time>, then <pause/roll back/abort> — owner <name>. (Define the number once above; reference it here, don't restate it.)

Avoid (anti-patterns)

  • Treating every launch as T1 — over-launching minor changes burns audience goodwill and team effort, and makes the next big launch land softer
  • No owner on launch tasks — "the team" owns nothing; every row needs one name
  • Shipping with no success metric or no rollback plan — you won't know if it worked and won't know when to pull back
  • Marketing / support / sales finding out at launch — surprise launches mean unanswered tickets, off-message reps, and no enablement
  • Assets due "by launch" — they need to land days earlier so reps and support can absorb them

Tips

  • Write the core message in one sentence first. If you can't, the launch isn't ready.
  • Pull support and sales in during pre-launch, not launch day — they're your front line.
  • Stage the rollout (internal → beta → % → all) for T1/T2 so the rollback trigger is cheap to pull.
  • The runbook is for the person who isn't you. Make it executable cold, at 6am, by whoever's on point.
  • Schedule the post-launch retro before launch day — otherwise it never happens.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,764. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.