agentsclimarketplace

App bug forensics

Skill sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library/skills/app-bug-forensics

Practical Codex skills distilled from real workflows, with clear provenance and community contributions.

Install
npx -y skills add sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library --skill app-bug-forensics

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 24 days oldThe repository was created 24 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when diagnosing or fixing user-reported application bugs. Guides evidence-backed root-cause analysis from symptoms, screenshots, logs, provider failures, background tasks, storage, or desktop lifecycle behavior through a scoped patch and regression tests.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

4.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

App Bug Forensics

Use this skill when a user reports a bug, screenshot, intermittent failure, or confusing app behavior. The goal is root cause first, patch second.

Workflow

  1. Preserve the symptom.

    • Identify the exact screen, action sequence, visible message, and affected data scope.
    • Inspect screenshots and logs when available.
    • Do not assume the visible error string names the real failing component.
  2. Trace the path.

    • Follow the request from UI event to state store, API client, backend route, persistence, sidecar/process boundary, and external provider when relevant.
    • Search for all places that can set the visible error state.
    • Check whether the failing request still belongs to the current selection.
    • For AI failures, identify the exact provider, model, transport, profile, credential source, timeout, and whether the request reached the provider.
  3. Classify likely root cause.

    • Stale async request or route watcher race.
    • Frontend/backend version mismatch or old sidecar process.
    • Missing optional capability being treated as fatal.
    • Provider protocol, model, key, base URL, or auth mismatch.
    • Default AI profile being added when the user selected another profile.
    • Long-running provider request blocked behind an unclosable dialog.
    • Provider request timed out locally after remote token usage already began.
    • Background job result, status, reconnect, or cancellation state was lost.
    • Saved credential/profile source disappeared or was overwritten by another profile.
    • Data migration/path/access issue.
    • UI overlay, selection, scrolling, or layout state bug.
    • Result view was hidden or discarded by navigation instead of explicit clearing.
    • Installer or process lifecycle half-update.
  4. Reproduce minimally.

    • Prefer a focused test or local run over broad speculation.
    • If the issue is intermittent, add timing, request tokens, or controlled mocked delays to reproduce the race.
    • If external provider behavior is suspected, separate mock branch tests from one real minimal connectivity test.
    • For charged or slow provider paths, do not auto-retry the full generation while investigating. Probe status and run only minimal real requests.
  5. Fix the cause.

    • Ignore stale results instead of showing stale errors.
    • Translate current real errors into user-facing copy.
    • Keep optional feature failures local to their own UI area.
    • If a request may already be running remotely, reconnect to local job state rather than resending the provider call.
    • Preserve completed AI results until the user explicitly clears or replaces them.
    • Preserve user data; do not "fix" by deleting local state unless the user explicitly asks.
  6. Lock the regression.

    • Add the narrowest meaningful test for the bug shape.
    • Include a manual acceptance path when the bug depends on installer, provider, OS, or real browser behavior.
    • Report what was reproduced, what was fixed, and what remains only manually verified.

Reference Use

Read references/app-quality-principles.md when the bug involves user-visible errors, provider tests, storage, startup, or UI state.

Read references/living-to-tell-casebook.md when the bug resembles raw Not Found, Failed to fetch, provider 403 HTML, sidecar leftovers, stale article/reference selection, startup black windows, data location confusion, or duplicate anchors/excerpts, AI result hiding, provider timeout after token use, profile key isolation, or background job recovery.

Red Lines

  • Do not hide a current valid failure by catching and ignoring every exception.
  • Do not claim the issue is fixed because a mock test passes.
  • Do not use fake data, fake provider success, or broad fallback behavior to make a test pass while the real user workflow remains broken.
  • Do not expose API keys, auth files, private text, or raw provider HTML in the final report.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.