agentsclimarketplace

Document this

Skill SID-SURANGE/cursor-team-ops/skills/core/document-this

Enforcement & release-hygiene layer for Cursor agents β€” blocking git/DB/license guardrails, commit hygiene, and docs-ops.

Install
npx -y skills add SID-SURANGE/cursor-team-ops --skill document-this

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Add why-only comments or docstrings to a function, class, or module. Writes comments that explain intent and constraints β€” not what the code does. Triggered by "document this function", "add comments", "write docstrings", "document-this".

SKILL.md

4.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

πŸ“– Skill: document-this

Purpose

Add comments that carry information the code cannot. The "why" β€” the constraint, the invariant, the non-obvious tradeoff β€” is the only thing worth writing. What the code does is already in the code.

This skill enforces the discipline the deslop skill removes: do not write narrating comments that restate the code in English.

Trigger phrases

  • "document this function"
  • "add comments"
  • "write docstrings"
  • "document-this"
  • "add JSDoc"
  • "add a docstring to this"
  • "explain why this works this way"

The rule

Write a comment if and only if removing it would leave a future reader confused about WHY β€” not WHAT.

Write itSkip it
Why this algorithm instead of the obvious oneWhat the loop does (the loop says it)
What invariant must hold when this is calledWhat the parameter means (the name says it)
Why this magic number (business rule, standard, bug workaround)That the function returns a value
What breaks silently if you change the orderThat this is a helper function
Which upstream bug this works aroundThat the class represents a user

Steps

1. Read the target

Read the function, class, or module the user pointed at. Do not infer scope β€” ask if unclear.

2. Identify comment-worthy facts

For each section of code, ask:

  • Is there a non-obvious constraint? (call order, thread safety, size limit, encoding assumption)
  • Is there a tradeoff the next person would re-litigate without context? (O(nΒ²) that's fine because n < 50, a cache that must stay warm)
  • Is there a workaround for an external bug, API quirk, or spec gap?
  • Is there a business rule that looks like a magic number?

If none of the above apply to a section, write no comment for it.

3. Choose the format

Language / contextFormat
JavaScript / TypeScript (exported)JSDoc /** */ on the function/class
JavaScript / TypeScript (internal)Single-line // above the relevant line
Python (public function/class)Docstring """...""" immediately inside
Python (internal)# comment above the relevant line
Go// comment on the exported symbol
OtherMatch the file's existing comment style

For JSDoc/docstrings on exported symbols, include:

  • One sentence: why this exists (not what it does)
  • @param lines only when the type or constraint is non-obvious
  • @returns only when the return value has a non-obvious meaning or invariant
  • @throws only when the caller must handle a specific error case

4. Write comments, not rewrites

  • Touch only comments. Do not rename, reformat, or restructure any code.
  • Place inline comments on the line they explain, or on the line above.
  • Keep each comment short β€” one to two lines. If you need three, the code needs restructuring, not a comment.

5. Present for review

Show the diff (old β†’ new) before applying. Say: "These comments explain the why β€” ready to apply?"

Do not apply until confirmed.

Output

A minimal diff adding comments only. No logic changes.

Example

Before:

def retry(fn, n=3, delay=1.5):
    for i in range(n):
        try:
            return fn()
        except Exception:
            if i == n - 1:
                raise
            time.sleep(delay * (2 ** i))

After (document-this applied):

def retry(fn, n=3, delay=1.5):
    # Exponential back-off: each retry waits 1.5Γ— longer to avoid thundering-herd
    # on the upstream rate limiter, which resets on a fixed 2s window.
    for i in range(n):
        try:
            return fn()
        except Exception:
            if i == n - 1:
                raise
            time.sleep(delay * (2 ** i))

Note: the loop body itself needs no comment β€” it is self-evident.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.