Postman openapi converter
Skill sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills/skills/postman-openapi-converter
AAS Core is the local, agent-first control plane for complete catalog discovery, agent-owned selection, stack validation, and planning, backed by 1,987+ agentic skills. Includes CLI, local MCP, catalog, plugins, and Workbench.
npx -y skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill postman-openapi-converterAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Convert OpenAPI 3.x or Swagger 2.0 specs (YAML or JSON) into complete, import-ready Postman Collection v2.1 JSON files. Use this skill whenever the user provides or references an OpenAPI spec, Swagger file, openapi.yaml, swagger.json, or uses phrases like "convert my OpenAPI spec",...
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
6.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
OpenAPI → Postman Collection Converter
When to Use
Use this skill when you need convert OpenAPI 3.x or Swagger 2.0 specs (YAML or JSON) into complete, import-ready Postman Collection v2.1 JSON files. Use this skill whenever the user provides or references an OpenAPI spec, Swagger file, openapi.yaml, swagger.json, or uses phrases like "convert my OpenAPI spec",...
Converts OpenAPI 3.x or Swagger 2.0 specs into a valid Postman Collection v2.1.
Step 1 — Detect & Validate Input
Identify the spec version from the input:
openapi: 3.x.x→ OpenAPI 3swagger: "2.0"→ Swagger 2
If the input is truncated or partial, convert what's available and note missing sections.
Step 2 — Extraction Mapping
OpenAPI 3 → Postman
| OpenAPI field | Postman mapping |
|---|---|
info.title | Collection name |
info.description | Collection description |
servers[0].url | {{base_url}} variable |
paths.<path>.<method> | One request item per operation |
operationId or summary | Request name |
parameters (path/query/header) | URL path variables, query params, headers |
requestBody.content.application/json.schema | Body (raw JSON), generate example from schema |
responses | Saved example responses |
components.securitySchemes | Collection-level auth |
tags | Folder grouping |
Swagger 2 → Postman
| Swagger field | Postman mapping |
|---|---|
host + basePath | {{base_url}} |
paths.<path>.<method> | Request item |
parameters | Query/path/header/body params |
consumes / produces | Content-Type / Accept headers |
securityDefinitions | Collection auth |
tags | Folders |
Step 3 — Generate Example Bodies
For each request with a requestBody or body parameter, generate a realistic example JSON body from the schema:
- Use property names as keys
- Infer sensible example values from type + format (e.g.,
"email"format →"[email protected]","date-time"→"2024-01-15T10:30:00Z") - For
$refschemas, resolve them inline
Step 4 — Auth Handling
Map security schemes to Postman auth:
| OpenAPI scheme | Postman auth type |
|---|---|
http: bearer | bearer with {{token}} |
http: basic | basic with {{username}} / {{password}} |
apiKey: header | apikey header with {{api_key}} |
apiKey: query | apikey query param |
oauth2 | oauth2 (note: requires manual token setup) |
Apply auth at collection level if all endpoints share the same scheme. Override at request level for exceptions.
Step 5 — Build Collection JSON
Use the standard v2.1 structure (same schema as postman-collection-generator skill).
Key differences for spec-converted collections:
- Always group by
tagsinto folders - Include
descriptionfield on each request fromoperationId+summary+description - Add saved example responses where
responsesare defined in the spec
"response": [
{
"name": "200 OK",
"status": "OK",
"code": 200,
"header": [{ "key": "Content-Type", "value": "application/json" }],
"body": "{ \"id\": 1, \"name\": \"example\" }",
"originalRequest": { <copy of the request> }
}
]
Step 6 — Environment File
Extract all variables into a companion environment:
base_urlfromservers[0].urlorhost + basePathtoken,api_key,username,passwordas empty placeholders- Any server variables from
servers[0].variables
Step 7 — Output
collection.json— Full Postman Collection v2.1environment.json— Matching environment file- Conversion summary: number of endpoints converted, folders created, auth type detected, any fields skipped or approximated
- Import instructions
Edge Cases
$refchains: Resolve all$refpointers inline before mappingallOf/oneOf/anyOf: Use the first/primary schema for body generation; note alternatives in description- Path parameters: Convert
{param}to:paramin URL path AND add tovariablearray in url object - Multiple content types: Prefer
application/json; note others in request description - No operationId: Generate name from
METHOD /path(e.g.,GET /users/{id}→Get User by ID)
Quality Checklist
- Every
pathsentry produces at least one request - Path params use
:paramformat in Postman URL - All
$refresolved — no raw$refstrings in output - Auth tokens are
{{variables}}, never hardcoded - JSON output is valid and importable
After Completing the API Design
Once the API design output is delivered, ask the user:
"Would you like me to generate API documentation for this design? (yes/no)"
If the user says yes:
- Check if the API Documentation skill is available in the installed skills list
- If the skill is available:
- Read and follow the instructions in the API Documentation skill
- Use the API design output above as the input
- If the skill is NOT available:
- Inform the user: "It looks like the API Documentation skill isn't installed. You can install it and re-run.
If the user says no:
- End the task here
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches its upstream source and local project context.
- Verify commands, generated code, dependencies, credentials, and external service behavior before applying changes.
- Do not treat examples as a substitute for environment-specific tests, security review, or user approval for destructive or costly actions.