Article illustrations
Skill sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/article-illustrations
AAS Core is the local, agent-first control plane for complete catalog discovery, agent-owned selection, stack validation, and planning, backed by 1,987+ agentic skills. Includes CLI, local MCP, catalog, plugins, and Workbench.
npx -y skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill article-illustrationsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Generate hand-drawn 16:9 article illustrations with the Grav character IP, sparse annotations, and absurd but clear visual metaphors.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
6.4 KB, ~1.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Article Illustrations — Grav Hand-Drawn Style
Overview
Generate 16:9 landscape hand-drawn illustrations for articles, blog posts, and technical content. Each illustration captures one cognitive anchor point from an article and turns it into a clean, absurd, memorable whiteboard-sketch explanation.
The skill uses a recurring character IP called Grav: a small, round, always-floating figure with dot eyes and a thin antenna. Grav participates in the core action of every illustration — never just decoration.
Repository: vipin-si/article-illustrations
When to Use This Skill
- Use when writing articles, blog posts, or documentation that need inline illustrations
- Use when you want to turn abstract concepts into concrete visual metaphors
- Use when you want a consistent visual language across multiple articles
- Use when you need hand-drawn explanation sketches, not PPT infographics
How It Works
Step 1: Digest the Article
Read the article and identify cognitive anchor points — core judgments, turning points, input/output loops, before/after contrasts, and common pitfalls. Don't distribute illustrations evenly; prioritize moments that benefit from visual explanation.
Step 2: Plan a Shot List
For each illustration, define:
- Placement: After which section
- Theme: What this image is about
- Core Meaning: The one idea it conveys
- Structure Type: One of 8 composition patterns (Workflow, System Closeup, Before/After, Role States, Conceptual Metaphor, Layered Method, Map Route, Mini Comic)
- Grav's Action: What Grav is doing in the scene
- Annotation Labels: 3–5 short English labels
Step 3: Generate Images
Use the generate_image tool with the built-in prompt template. Each image follows strict style rules:
- Pure white background, no textures
- Black hand-drawn line art with slight wobble
- Sparse red/orange/blue handwritten annotations
- Grav always floating (never touching surfaces)
- One core idea per image
- 40–60% canvas usage, 35%+ whitespace
Step 4: QA Check
Verify each image against the QA checklist: correct format, Grav present and active, original metaphor, clean composition, sparse annotations, correct color usage.
Examples
Example 1: Plan illustrations for an article
Analyze this article and create a shot list of 5 illustrations.
Don't generate images yet — just plan which cognitive anchor points
deserve illustrations and what each image should convey.
<paste article>
Example 2: Generate illustrations directly
Generate 4 Grav-style illustrations for this article.
Requirements: 16:9 landscape, pure white background, black hand-drawn
line art, sparse red/orange/blue English annotations.
<paste article>
Example 3: Single concept illustration
Generate one 16:9 illustration for this concept:
"Trust isn't declared — it's built one piece of evidence at a time."
Grav must perform the core action. Maximum 5 annotation labels.
Example 4: Iterate on a result
This illustration is on the right track, but Grav feels like decoration.
Keep the core meaning but regenerate: make Grav the one actually
driving the structure.
Visual Style
| Element | Rule |
|---|---|
| Background | Pure white — no cream, texture, gradients, or shadows |
| Line art | Black, hand-drawn, slightly wobbly, not mechanical |
| Whitespace | Main subject 40–60% of canvas, 35%+ empty space |
| Annotations | Handwritten English, 2–5 words each, max 5–8 per image |
| Color: Black | Main line art, characters, structures, objects |
| Color: Red | Key highlights, problems, warnings, results |
| Color: Orange | Main flow, paths, arrows, direction |
| Color: Blue | Supplementary notes, feedback, system state |
| Prohibited | Green, purple, yellow, pink, gradients, drop shadows, 3D, realistic UI |
Character: Grav
- Small round body (pebble/potato shape)
- Two dot eyes (slightly asymmetric)
- One thin bent antenna with tiny circle tip
- Thin stick legs that dangle without touching surfaces
- Always hovering — visible gap between Grav and any surface
- Expression: calm, focused, deadpan
- Role: active participant in the system, never decoration
Best Practices
- ✅ Start with a shot list before generating images
- ✅ Invent a new metaphor for every illustration — never reuse compositions
- ✅ Make Grav the action protagonist, not a bystander
- ✅ Keep it absurd but structurally clear
- ✅ Use color sparingly — when in doubt, use black
- ❌ Don't make PPT infographics or formal flowcharts
- ❌ Don't add title bars or decorative frames
- ❌ Don't let Grav touch the ground or stand on surfaces
- ❌ Don't make Grav cute, smiling, or emoji-like
Limitations
- Requires access to an image-generation tool that can follow composition, line-art, and annotation constraints.
- The recurring Grav character style can drift between generations; verify every output against the QA checklist.
- Text in generated images may be misspelled or distorted, so short labels and post-generation review are required.
- The style is intended for explanatory article illustrations, not photorealistic product imagery or brand-final artwork.
Common Pitfalls
-
Problem: Illustration looks like a PPT slide Solution: Remove 30% of elements, increase whitespace, make it weirder
-
Problem: Grav is just standing next to the action Solution: Redesign so Grav IS the mechanism — becomes the funnel, dangles from the lever, is suspended inside the machine
-
Problem: Same metaphor as a previous illustration Solution: Replace the physical object entirely — same concept, different analogy