agentsclimarketplace

Ai prompt leaking

Skill ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge/skills/curated/ai-prompt-leaking

bb-huge ๐Ÿค— , Personal bug bounty findings hub and bug bounty orchestration for multiple agents

Install
npx -y skills add ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge --skill ai-prompt-leaking

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 18 stars18 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Systematically extract hidden system prompts, core directives, and invisible context intentionally concealed within Large Language Model (LLM) applications. This skill utilizes targeted linguistic engineering and boundary manipulation to bypass prompt opacity.

The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the authorโ€™s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

3.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

AI Prompt Leaking

When to Use

  • When analyzing an AI-powered system (customer support bot, coding assistant, data analyst) to uncover its proprietary internal instructions, hidden API keys, or pre-configured biases.
  • To demonstrate how seemingly secure conversational agents can be tricked into revealing their foundational programming.

Prerequisites

  • Access to target AI/ML system or local model deployment for testing
  • Python 3.9+ with relevant ML libraries (transformers, torch, openai)
  • Understanding of LLM architecture and prompt processing pipelines
  • Authorized scope and rules of engagement for AI red team testing

Workflow

Phase 1: Context Boundary Testing

# Concept: The LLM ```

### Phase 2: Targeted Extraction Prompts

```text
# ```

### Phase 3: Translation and Obfuscation Exploitation

```text
# ```

### Phase 4: Summarization Attacks

```text
# ```

#### Decision Point ๐Ÿ”€
```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Formulate Prompt ] --> B{Prompt Leaked ]}
    B -->|Yes| C[Document System ]
    B -->|No| D[Refine ]
    C --> E[Exploit Further ]

๐Ÿ”ต Blue Team Detection & Defense

  • Strict Delimiters: Heuristic Output Filtering: Key Concepts | Concept | Description | |---------|-------------|

Output Format

Ai Prompt Leaking โ€” Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]

Findings Summary:
  [Finding 1]: [Severity] โ€” [Brief description]
  [Finding 2]: [Severity] โ€” [Brief description]

Detailed Results:
  Phase 1: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

  Phase 2: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

Risk Rating: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]
Recommendations:
  1. [Immediate remediation step]
  2. [Long-term hardening measure]
  3. [Monitoring/detection improvement]

๐Ÿ“š Shared Resources

For cross-cutting methodology applicable to all vulnerability classes, see:

References

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.