Ai jailbreak system prompts

Skill ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge/skills/curated/ai-jailbreak-system-prompts

bb-huge 🤗 , Personal bug bounty findings hub and bug bounty orchestration for multiple agents

Install

npx -y skills add ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge --skill ai-jailbreak-system-prompts

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

18 stars18 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Advanced techniques for bypassing LLM safety filters, instruction tuning, and system prompt restrictions using specialized linguistic constructs, hypothetical scenarios, and persona adoption.

The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

3.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

AI Jailbreaking & System Prompt Bypasses

When to Use

When conducting security assessments of Large Language Models (LLMs) integrated into chatbots, virtual assistants, or backend AI data processing pipelines.
To demonstrate how instruction-tuned models can be forced into producing harmful, unethical, or restricted outputs by carefully crafting adversarial prompts.

Prerequisites

Access to target AI/ML system or local model deployment for testing
Python 3.9+ with relevant ML libraries (transformers, torch, openai)
Understanding of LLM architecture and prompt processing pipelines
Authorized scope and rules of engagement for AI red team testing

Workflow

Phase 1: Understanding Target Model Constraints

# Concept: LLM safety filters ```

### Phase 2: Persona Adoption Attacks

```text
# ```

### Phase 3: Developer Mode & Fictional Scenarios

```text
# ```

### Phase 4: Payload Encoding & Obfuscation

```text
# ```

#### Decision Point 🔀
```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Craft Prompt ] --> B{Bypass Successful ]}
    B -->|Yes| C[Capture Output ]
    B -->|No| D[Refine Approach ]
    C --> E[Test Edge Cases ]

🔵 Blue Team Detection & Defense

Filter Ensembling: Context Monitoring: Key Concepts | Concept | Description | |---------|-------------|

Output Format

Ai Jailbreak System Prompts — Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]

Findings Summary:
  [Finding 1]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
  [Finding 2]: [Severity] — [Brief description]

Detailed Results:
  Phase 1: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

  Phase 2: [Phase name]
    - Result: [Outcome]
    - Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
    - Impact: [Business impact assessment]

Risk Rating: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]
Recommendations:
  1. [Immediate remediation step]
  2. [Long-term hardening measure]
  3. [Monitoring/detection improvement]

📚 Shared Resources

For cross-cutting methodology applicable to all vulnerability classes, see:

_shared/references/elite-chaining-strategy.md — Exploit chaining methodology and high-payout chain patterns

_shared/references/elite-report-writing.md — HackerOne-optimized report writing, CWE quick reference

_shared/references/real-world-bounties.md — Verified disclosed bounties by vulnerability class

References

OWASP: LLM Top 10 - Prompt Injection
Anthropic: Red Teaming Language Models