agentsclimarketplace

Research knowledge orchestrator

Skill Sheshiyer/skill-clusters/skills/research-knowledge-orchestrator

Hub-and-spoke agent-skill clusters, one per stack (Astro·GSAP·Remotion, Tauri, …). Installable via skills.sh.

Install
npx -y skills add Sheshiyer/skill-clusters --skill research-knowledge-orchestrator

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Route a research or knowledge task to the right skill among 12 specialists — current-web research, neural discovery, multi-source cited synthesis, systematic literature review, scholarly evaluation, biomedical/patent/genomic databases, codebase onboarding, guided code tours, live docs lookup, and persistent project memory. USE WHEN a user wants to research, investigate, review the literature, look something up, or understand a codebase but hasn't named the specific tool.

SKILL.md

7.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Research & Knowledge Orchestrator

The single entry skill for research and knowledge work. It locates the task on the question type × evidence depth map and delegates to one of 12 specialist spokes. The cross-cutting discipline every spoke shares — pick the lightest evidence lane that answers the question, label every claim by provenance, and escalate only when synthesis demands it — lives in research-knowledge-core; read it before promising coverage or mixing sources.

Routing map (intent → spoke)

Operate a research pass (start here when the lane is unclear)

  • "Research this", "compare", "what's the latest", recurring lookup → research-ops (operator wrapper; chooses the lane below)

Current-web research

  • Fast discovery / web · code · company · people lookup → exa-search
  • Thorough, cited, multi-source report ("deep dive", "current state of") → deep-research

Academic & scientific literature

  • Find · screen · synthesize · cite a body of literature → scientific-thinking-literature-review
  • Judge a paper / proposal / methods section / evidence quality → scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation
  • Biomedical literature, MeSH, PMID, E-utilities → scientific-db-pubmed-database
  • Patents & trademarks, official IP records → scientific-db-uspto-database
  • Genomic database queries, sequence lookup, enrichment → scientific-pkg-gget

Understand a codebase

  • Map an unfamiliar repo → onboarding guide + starter CLAUDE.md → codebase-onboarding
  • Author a step-by-step .tour walkthrough (onboarding / PR / RCA) → code-tour

Reference & memory

  • Up-to-date library/framework docs (named framework, API, setup) → documentation-lookup
  • Persist project context across sessions; resume where you left off → ck

Folded spokes (content extraction, scraping, transcripts, monitoring)

Routable spokes folded into this cluster. They cover the acquisition and distillation lanes — getting raw content out of the web/feeds/recordings and turning it into structured, summarized evidence — feeding the research lanes above.

General research & content distillation

  • Three-mode research (quick/standard/extensive) + content extraction; 240+ Fabric patterns → research
  • Current open-web search with source extraction and evidence gathering → web-search
  • Apply a named Fabric pattern (extract wisdom, summarize, threat model, etc.) to content → fabric
  • Summarize/transcribe a URL, podcast, or local file (text + transcript fallback) → summarize

Parse & extract structured content

  • Parse URLs, files, videos, PDFs, articles to structured JSON (entities, transcripts, batch) → parser
  • Fetch + summarize a YouTube video's transcript (proxy-backed for cloud IP blocks) → youtube-transcript

Scrape the web at scale

  • Social-media / e-commerce / business-data scraping via Apify actors (Twitter, IG, LinkedIn, TikTok, Maps, Amazon) → apify
  • Progressive, tiered URL scraping via Bright Data → brightdata

Meetings & feeds monitoring

  • Analyze meeting transcripts/recordings for communication patterns and actionable feedback → meeting-insights-analyzer
  • Interact with Fireflies meeting data and the Fireflies API (via Membrane) → fireflies
  • Monitor blogs and RSS/Atom feeds for updates (blogwatcher CLI) → blogwatcher

Standard Operating Flow

  1. Classify the ask: which question type (current fact · comparison · literature · IP · genomic · codebase · API reference · resume context) and which evidence depth.
  2. Take the lightest useful lane first — local/docs/memory before web, exa-search before deep-research, scoping review before systematic. The model and escalation ladder are in research-knowledge-core.
  3. Delegate to the spoke(s). Multi-step asks fan out in evidence order (e.g. "review the literature and rate the key paper" → scientific-thinking-literature-reviewscientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation).
  4. Return: chosen spoke(s), the evidence lane used, claims labeled by provenance (sourced fact / supplied context / inference / recommendation), dates on freshness-sensitive answers, and the next action.

Guardrails

See research-knowledge-core. In short: evidence-tier discipline — never answer a current question from stale memory when a fresh search is cheap; never mix inference into sourced facts without labeling it; never spin up a heavyweight research pass when local code, docs, or ck memory already hold the answer; always date freshness-sensitive claims and name your sources. The cluster's value is trustworthy, traceable answers — don't trade that for speed.

Boundaries

  • "Research this" — which spoke? Default a bare, lane-unclear "research this" to research-ops, which picks the rung. Skip it and go direct when the lane is already obvious: deep-research for a thorough multi-source cited report on a general/web topic; the scientific-* spokes (scientific-thinking-literature-review, -scholar-evaluation, scientific-db-pubmed-database, -uspto-database, scientific-pkg-gget) when the subject is academic / biomedical / IP / genomic and needs scholarly rigor or a citable database.
  • Codebase, not the web. codebase-onboarding and code-tour operate on this repo's own source — mapping it and authoring .tour walkthroughs. They are not web research; for external topics use deep-research / exa-search instead.

Picked-up spokes (knowledge-base authoring & scientific computation)

Vetted additions from the antigravity-awesome-skills library (MIT). They extend two lanes the cluster was thin on: personal knowledge-base authoring (Obsidian vaults) and exact scientific computation, plus one more content-extraction tool.

Knowledge base authoring (Obsidian)

  • Write/edit Obsidian Flavored Markdown — wikilinks, embeds, callouts, properties → obsidian-markdown
  • Build .base database-views (filters, formulas, table/card/list) over notes → obsidian-bases
  • Author/edit .canvas visual maps, mind maps, knowledge graphs (JSON Canvas 1.0) → json-canvas
  • Shell-driven vault ops + plugin/theme dev against a running Obsidian → obsidian-cli

Scientific computation (turn sourced data into exact results)

  • Symbolic math: solve equations, calculus, simplification, closed-form derivations → sympy
  • Astronomy: coordinates, units, FITS I/O, WCS, cosmology, precise time → astropy

Content extraction

  • Token-lean clean-markdown extraction from a webpage via the Defuddle CLI → defuddle (use over a raw page fetch when reading docs/articles/blog posts; complements parser/web-search)

Loading spokes on demand

To keep CLI startup context lean, this cluster's spokes are not separately registered as skills — only this orchestrator and its *-core are enumerated. When you route to a spoke named above, load it on demand by reading its file:

~/.agents/skill-clusters/skills/<spoke-name>/SKILL.md (or skills/<spoke-name>/SKILL.md inside the skill-clusters repo).

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.