Research knowledge orchestrator
Skill Sheshiyer/skill-clusters/skills/research-knowledge-orchestrator
Route a research or knowledge task to the right skill among 12 specialists — current-web research, neural discovery, multi-source cited synthesis, systematic literature review, scholarly evaluation, biomedical/patent/genomic databases, codebase onboarding, guided code tours, live docs lookup, and persistent project memory. USE WHEN a user wants to research, investigate, review the literature, look something up, or understand a codebase but hasn't named the specific tool.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add Sheshiyer/skill-clusters --skill research-knowledge-orchestratorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
7.6 KB, ~1.6k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Research & Knowledge Orchestrator
The single entry skill for research and knowledge work. It locates the task on the
question type × evidence depth map and delegates to one of 12 specialist spokes. The
cross-cutting discipline every spoke shares — pick the lightest evidence lane that answers
the question, label every claim by provenance, and escalate only when synthesis demands it —
lives in research-knowledge-core; read it before promising coverage or mixing sources.
Routing map (intent → spoke)
Operate a research pass (start here when the lane is unclear)
- "Research this", "compare", "what's the latest", recurring lookup →
research-ops(operator wrapper; chooses the lane below)
Current-web research
- Fast discovery / web · code · company · people lookup →
exa-search - Thorough, cited, multi-source report ("deep dive", "current state of") →
deep-research
Academic & scientific literature
- Find · screen · synthesize · cite a body of literature →
scientific-thinking-literature-review - Judge a paper / proposal / methods section / evidence quality →
scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation - Biomedical literature, MeSH, PMID, E-utilities →
scientific-db-pubmed-database - Patents & trademarks, official IP records →
scientific-db-uspto-database - Genomic database queries, sequence lookup, enrichment →
scientific-pkg-gget
Understand a codebase
- Map an unfamiliar repo → onboarding guide + starter CLAUDE.md →
codebase-onboarding - Author a step-by-step
.tourwalkthrough (onboarding / PR / RCA) →code-tour
Reference & memory
- Up-to-date library/framework docs (named framework, API, setup) →
documentation-lookup - Persist project context across sessions; resume where you left off →
ck
Folded spokes (content extraction, scraping, transcripts, monitoring)
Routable spokes folded into this cluster. They cover the acquisition and distillation lanes — getting raw content out of the web/feeds/recordings and turning it into structured, summarized evidence — feeding the research lanes above.
General research & content distillation
- Three-mode research (quick/standard/extensive) + content extraction; 240+ Fabric patterns →
research - Current open-web search with source extraction and evidence gathering →
web-search - Apply a named Fabric pattern (extract wisdom, summarize, threat model, etc.) to content →
fabric - Summarize/transcribe a URL, podcast, or local file (text + transcript fallback) →
summarize
Parse & extract structured content
- Parse URLs, files, videos, PDFs, articles to structured JSON (entities, transcripts, batch) →
parser - Fetch + summarize a YouTube video's transcript (proxy-backed for cloud IP blocks) →
youtube-transcript
Scrape the web at scale
- Social-media / e-commerce / business-data scraping via Apify actors (Twitter, IG, LinkedIn, TikTok, Maps, Amazon) →
apify - Progressive, tiered URL scraping via Bright Data →
brightdata
Meetings & feeds monitoring
- Analyze meeting transcripts/recordings for communication patterns and actionable feedback →
meeting-insights-analyzer - Interact with Fireflies meeting data and the Fireflies API (via Membrane) →
fireflies - Monitor blogs and RSS/Atom feeds for updates (blogwatcher CLI) →
blogwatcher
Standard Operating Flow
- Classify the ask: which question type (current fact · comparison · literature · IP · genomic · codebase · API reference · resume context) and which evidence depth.
- Take the lightest useful lane first — local/docs/memory before web,
exa-searchbeforedeep-research, scoping review before systematic. The model and escalation ladder are inresearch-knowledge-core. - Delegate to the spoke(s). Multi-step asks fan out in evidence order (e.g. "review the literature and rate the key paper" →
scientific-thinking-literature-review→scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation). - Return: chosen spoke(s), the evidence lane used, claims labeled by provenance (sourced fact / supplied context / inference / recommendation), dates on freshness-sensitive answers, and the next action.
Guardrails
See research-knowledge-core. In short: evidence-tier discipline — never answer a current
question from stale memory when a fresh search is cheap; never mix inference into sourced facts
without labeling it; never spin up a heavyweight research pass when local code, docs, or ck
memory already hold the answer; always date freshness-sensitive claims and name your sources.
The cluster's value is trustworthy, traceable answers — don't trade that for speed.
Boundaries
- "Research this" — which spoke? Default a bare, lane-unclear "research this" to
research-ops, which picks the rung. Skip it and go direct when the lane is already obvious:deep-researchfor a thorough multi-source cited report on a general/web topic; thescientific-*spokes (scientific-thinking-literature-review,-scholar-evaluation,scientific-db-pubmed-database,-uspto-database,scientific-pkg-gget) when the subject is academic / biomedical / IP / genomic and needs scholarly rigor or a citable database. - Codebase, not the web.
codebase-onboardingandcode-touroperate on this repo's own source — mapping it and authoring.tourwalkthroughs. They are not web research; for external topics usedeep-research/exa-searchinstead.
Picked-up spokes (knowledge-base authoring & scientific computation)
Vetted additions from the antigravity-awesome-skills library (MIT). They extend two lanes the cluster was thin on: personal knowledge-base authoring (Obsidian vaults) and exact scientific computation, plus one more content-extraction tool.
Knowledge base authoring (Obsidian)
- Write/edit Obsidian Flavored Markdown — wikilinks, embeds, callouts, properties →
obsidian-markdown - Build
.basedatabase-views (filters, formulas, table/card/list) over notes →obsidian-bases - Author/edit
.canvasvisual maps, mind maps, knowledge graphs (JSON Canvas 1.0) →json-canvas - Shell-driven vault ops + plugin/theme dev against a running Obsidian →
obsidian-cli
Scientific computation (turn sourced data into exact results)
- Symbolic math: solve equations, calculus, simplification, closed-form derivations →
sympy - Astronomy: coordinates, units, FITS I/O, WCS, cosmology, precise time →
astropy
Content extraction
- Token-lean clean-markdown extraction from a webpage via the Defuddle CLI →
defuddle(use over a raw page fetch when reading docs/articles/blog posts; complementsparser/web-search)
Loading spokes on demand
To keep CLI startup context lean, this cluster's spokes are not separately registered as skills — only this orchestrator and its *-core are enumerated. When you route to a spoke named above, load it on demand by reading its file:
~/.agents/skill-clusters/skills/<spoke-name>/SKILL.md (or skills/<spoke-name>/SKILL.md inside the skill-clusters repo).
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.