Competitor teardown
Hub-and-spoke agent-skill clusters, one per stack (Astro·GSAP·Remotion, Tauri, …). Installable via skills.sh.
npx -y skills add Sheshiyer/skill-clusters --skill competitor-teardownAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when you need a structured comparison of adjacent products, creators, accounts, brands, or messaging ecosystems. USE WHEN the user wants a competitor teardown, market scan, or research-driven breakdown of how a rival positions, messages, and behaves across channels.
SKILL.md
1.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Competitor Teardown
Use this skill to turn market scanning into a structured teardown instead of ad hoc notes.
Related Skills and Inputs
competitor-alternatives— direct alternative / comparison pagescontent-strategy— turning findings into a content angle- web search / social reading tools — current evidence
Output Shape
Every teardown should cover:
- Target and category
- Audience and positioning
- Messaging hooks
- Format/channel behavior
- Strengths
- Weaknesses or blind spots
- Opportunity for your product
- Evidence links
Workflow
- Use web search or social reading tools to gather current evidence.
- Use
competitor-alternativeswhen the teardown overlaps with direct alternative/comparison framing. - Normalize findings into the output shape above.
- If the teardown changes strategy, routing, or packaging decisions, hand the actionable finding off to your task/issue tracker with a clear title (
COMPETITOR_TEARDOWN: <target>), a summary of the evidence, and a recommended response.
Guardrails
- This skill is for analysis, not attack content.
- Do not fabricate feature comparisons or messaging claims.
- Cite current evidence for any conclusion that could affect strategy or publishing.