Explain
Skill SerhiiKorniienko/bullshit-detector/skills/analysis/explain
Explain content or any concept inside it at the depth the user needs — ELI5, practitioner level, or expert deep-dive — with a jargon glossary and context the original assumes. Use when the user says "explain this", "what does X mean here", "break this down", "I don't understand this part", or shares content and asks how something in it works.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add SerhiiKorniienko/bullshit-detector --skill explainAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
SKILL.md
1.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
explain
Make the content understandable without dumbing it down dishonestly.
Workflow
- Get the text (via
fetch-contentskill script if it's a URL, else web fetch or paste). - Pick the depth — from the user's request, or ask one short question if genuinely unclear:
- ELI5 — analogies, zero jargon, the core mechanism only
- Practitioner — assumes general technical literacy, focuses on how it works and what to do with it
- Deep dive — mechanisms, edge cases, history, competing views
- Explain, structured as:
- The one-sentence version first
- The mechanism: how it actually works, step by step
- Glossary: every jargon term the content uses without defining, one line each
- What the content assumes you know — the missing prerequisites that made it confusing
- Where the content's own explanation is wrong or oversimplified, if it is — flag it, don't repeat it
Rules
- Explaining ≠ endorsing. If the content's claim is contested, present the explanation and note the contest ("the video asserts X; the standard view is Y").
- Analogies must survive scrutiny — say where the analogy breaks.
- If the user points at a specific segment ("the part at 12:30", "section 3"), explain that segment in the context of the whole, not in isolation.
- Don't pad: a concept that takes three sentences gets three sentences.